safc ii
#76
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: From SLO to San Jose
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^using that "fact" is a bit of false reasoning. the pdf above would allude that the sensor used in the RA is a hotwire type sensor(part 2, fig 3 & 4, in the pdf), something that mitsu doesn't seem to ever have used in one of their sub-2 liter cars, at least. although there is mention of a pressure sensor in the pdf, there is no evidence that the RA uses such a sensor. you can tell by comparing fig 2a to fig 1 that the pressure sensor is the sensor on the bottom left, not the RA sensor which is on the right.
#77
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
then that would state that the piggybacks RRM uses wouldn't adjust anything... They intercept that same red/white wire. They also modify hz frequency which is the premise for the karmen vortex signal. Thus the sensor must be karmen... perhaps there is some special calibration of the frequency needed in order to see it's deviation??
#78
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Boeturbolancer
then that would state that the piggybacks RRM uses wouldn't adjust anything... They intercept that same red/white wire. They also modify hz frequency which is the premise for the karmen vortex signal. Thus the sensor must be karmen...
perhaps there is some special calibration of the frequency needed in order to see it's deviation??
#79
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Treilix
They have them working on standard lancers (OZ, ES) not the 2.4. If there was a way BELIEVE me i tried. I know there was someone claiming that he had done it on "several" ralliarts, but after some decent questioning, he backed out.
#80
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: From SLO to San Jose
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe the piggy for the RA is a different model and someone didn't tell you j/k
i know there are a few versions of the PSC1 and that all piggybacks will want to cut into that red/white wire. those with the safc all couldn't have hooked it up wrong.
i know there are a few versions of the PSC1 and that all piggybacks will want to cut into that red/white wire. those with the safc all couldn't have hooked it up wrong.
#81
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by rhyzin
^using that "fact" is a bit of false reasoning. the pdf above would allude that the sensor used in the RA is a hotwire type sensor(part 2, fig 3 & 4, in the pdf), something that mitsu doesn't seem to ever have used in one of their sub-2 liter cars, at least. although there is mention of a pressure sensor in the pdf, there is no evidence that the RA uses such a sensor. you can tell by comparing fig 2a to fig 1 that the pressure sensor is the sensor on the bottom left, not the RA sensor which is on the right.
then were are in square 1
the fact im relating to:
http://www.apexi-usa.com/pdf/technic...tation/202.pdf
http://www.apexi-usa.com/pdf/product...tation/202.pdf
think is page 37 and page 21 on the pdf's
see and note that all mivec engines that are "sub2 liter" and even the fto's (6cil) are assigned a pressure sensor setup (press-5) and the maps used are either M2-a or M3-b <---like our ecu (funny thing isn't it).. so if there are wrong who we should believe....
now is karman or not who has it right consensus or facts?
Last edited by PR_Mivec; Nov 1, 2005 at 05:10 AM.
#82
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
only other info i'll share is that the sensor IS Karmen... now the varience in it's setup and frequency could be different than any other Karmen sensor.
After all... if i wanted to ensure people couldn't tamper with my stuff i'd figure a way to modify it so that standard off the shelf products would be useless.
After all... if i wanted to ensure people couldn't tamper with my stuff i'd figure a way to modify it so that standard off the shelf products would be useless.
#83
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
boe has a good piont. RRM did it by tapping this wire and the RPM signal.
From what I understrood about Karmen sensors, they report airflow via frequency, right? I never heard anything about their ALWAYS having to be a square/step wave. Typically, I have only seen Karmen's that use a 5v step wave. However, a 5v sine wave would be just as effective, but would require a slightly different circuit. No big deal.
IF our sensor is a Karmen (i believe it is, however an odd implamentation) and the oscillioscope is showing a sine wave, the wave ITSELF should not really change as air flow is increased. still rising to 5v on the y-axis. If you scope is old, the wave might narrow (IE: the x-axis may change due to the sampling). You said it did not. Does your scope show a x delta? If so, did it change?
Some old scopes i used will keep like 1.5 waves, regardless of the frequency, but show a change in delta, indicating the frequency change and x-axis scaling.
just a thougth. either way, great work guys. we are getting somewhere =)
From what I understrood about Karmen sensors, they report airflow via frequency, right? I never heard anything about their ALWAYS having to be a square/step wave. Typically, I have only seen Karmen's that use a 5v step wave. However, a 5v sine wave would be just as effective, but would require a slightly different circuit. No big deal.
IF our sensor is a Karmen (i believe it is, however an odd implamentation) and the oscillioscope is showing a sine wave, the wave ITSELF should not really change as air flow is increased. still rising to 5v on the y-axis. If you scope is old, the wave might narrow (IE: the x-axis may change due to the sampling). You said it did not. Does your scope show a x delta? If so, did it change?
Some old scopes i used will keep like 1.5 waves, regardless of the frequency, but show a change in delta, indicating the frequency change and x-axis scaling.
just a thougth. either way, great work guys. we are getting somewhere =)
#84
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not karman I have the RRM piggy and R4 software it runs from 1.6v idle to 4.6-7v full blast and the tables are X=RPM and Y=voltage. And NO it's not compatible with either SAFC,AFC or old blue E-manage. I tried the SAFC and it's not compatible.
#86
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: From SLO to San Jose
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i don't know anything about electronics, but i have a question about transistors. for both sensors (RA and g94), they have a transistor connected to the red/white wire. the r/w wire is a constant 5v from the ecu. the 5v is connected to the transistor in the sensor. so the sensing part of the sensor inputs a value between 0-5v. my question is, when the voltage from the sensor reaches 5v, does that allow the path to ground causing the 5v portion of the square wave? then this in turn means there's a 0v presence when the sensor inputs <5v? this would make both a frequency type sensor, no?
karman
RA
karman
RA
#87
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by Thunder-rush
It's not karman I have the RRM piggy and R4 software it runs from 1.6v idle to 4.6-7v full blast and the tables are X=RPM and Y=voltage. And NO it's not compatible with either SAFC,AFC or old blue E-manage. I tried the SAFC and it's not compatible.
#88
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by blk-majik
From what Myszkewicz found during his testing, this cant be true, unless he is reading the wrong signal.
As I said before, my scope is OLD. It's an Aron BS-310S. I can't even find much about it on the 'Net.
Maybe someone with a newer scope (and a little more experience using it) can come up with the right answer. All I'm doing is adding to the confusion with my various results.