Notices
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain (no forced induction)

Cylinder Head project !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2007, 02:40 PM
  #181  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
boozeup&riot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: you-taw
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by migueralliart
IIRC? you mean WRX?

EDIT : Ohh and with the camshaft I am pretty sure I will be hitting .60 duty cycle on 440cc injectors . People don't believe that much in NA engines nowadays, but they can still suck a lot of **** into them hehehe


Migue - unless I'm misunderstanding the context here: IIRC= If I recall correctly.

If thats not what you mean... well, hell I've been really good at misunderstanding people lately heh.
Old Jun 14, 2007, 03:42 PM
  #182  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, if I recall correctly the WRX injectors that I purchased from a guy on NASIOC will flow 440cc, they are the stock injectors for his vehicle and everything is supposed to fit, maybe with a washer according to someone I talked to. the stock wrx injectors are light blue, not pink (those are for the STI, and don't fit our rail as far as I have been told

Injectors are rated at flow/minute at X pressure, three variables. you can use more fuel pressure to increase the amount of fuel at a certain duty cycle, to a point. With 440cc injectors Migue should be fine up to 300HP at 80%-90% duty cycle, and I haven't looked at the chart so that's a guess, with an adjustable fuel pressure system. That is a good injector size to meet his target of 250, if he goes over 50 he has at least a 15% margin before he needs to upgrade those injectors.

Just FYI
As the injector reaches it's maximum duty cycle at any fuel pressure the injector is held open constantly, and therefore can flow no more fuel at that pressure. The goal is to balance an injector with the available fuel pressure that will allow a 75% to 80% duty cycle at your HP rating.

the closer to the max duty cycle the more likely you will suffer fuel starvation because the time between opening and closing the injector is so small, fuel delivery is more and more difficult to increase unless pressure is added to assist the injectors. that's why you want a decent margin away from your duty cycle.

Last edited by DangerousDan; Jun 14, 2007 at 03:47 PM.
Old Jun 14, 2007, 04:48 PM
  #183  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
migueralliart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So in other words stock injectors will max out @ 200 Crank power but if you raise pressure changing the returnless system you might go up a little
Old Jun 14, 2007, 04:55 PM
  #184  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, you should be able to push more fuel with the stock injectors, but I doubt it will cover what you are looking for. it looks like your calculator there will do the math for you
Old Jun 14, 2007, 04:57 PM
  #185  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and that's not maxed out, per say, it's just within a reasonable limit on the stock injectors at 200chp.
Old Jun 14, 2007, 10:06 PM
  #186  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
migueralliart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok here are some pics of the IM ported already I just got here and I am tired I will try to post tomorrow before and after IM runners . They port the **** out of it....
BTW it is not finished I still have to clean it up and ceramic coat it and then red painting.....

They matched the ports up to gasket and deeper in the manifold as they could...






Last edited by migueralliart; Jun 14, 2007 at 10:10 PM.
Old Jun 14, 2007, 10:43 PM
  #187  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
PR_Mivec's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
interesting
Old Jun 14, 2007, 10:44 PM
  #188  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
boozeup&riot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: you-taw
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
migue and dan, just so that I understand everything (thanks for your patience) that you are saying: with the stock fuel system, we are good for just a little over 200 atc safely, but thats kinda pushing it. If I understand things correctly, with a stock WRX injectors, he should be good for 300 hp. I apologize if this is a completely stupid question, but:
He's going to be running the smt-6. Will an FPR be necessary here, or is that all taken care of by the smt unit? - my understanding of this stuff is obviously very limited.

Migue, you suggested changing the returnless fuel system - I assume you mean going to a return system...? If so, were you just going to do the part from the OZ fuel pump, or did you have something else in mind?

Basically, I'm wondering what plans you had in mind exactly for delivering fuel safely. This is one thing that I just don't seem to completely understand. People start talking about duty cycles and something inside just cries a little heh.

The reason why I ask in such detail simply so that I'm able to wrap my brain around the whole thing. Again thanks as always for the patient answer.
Old Jun 14, 2007, 10:52 PM
  #189  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
migueralliart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by boozeup&riot
migue and dan, just so that I understand everything (thanks for your patience) that you are saying: with the stock fuel system, we are good for just a little over 200 atc safely, but thats kinda pushing it. If I understand things correctly, with a stock WRX injectors, he should be good for 300 hp. I apologize if this is a completely stupid question, but:
He's going to be running the smt-6. Will an FPR be necessary here, or is that all taken care of by the smt unit? - my understanding of this stuff is obviously very limited.

Migue, you suggested changing the returnless fuel system - I assume you mean going to a return system...? If so, were you just going to do the part from the OZ fuel pump, or did you have something else in mind?

Basically, I'm wondering what plans you had in mind exactly for delivering fuel safely. This is one thing that I just don't seem to completely understand. People start talking about duty cycles and something inside just cries a little heh.

The reason why I ask in such detail simply so that I'm able to wrap my brain around the whole thing. Again thanks as always for the patient answer.
Well , first yes stock WRX serve as up to 300 .. the SMt-6 will adjust for this and a FPR wont be needed , this is only needed for NOS or TUrbo. If I were to upgrade something else it will be posted in here but right now I only need to upgrade the Injectors,,,
Old Jun 14, 2007, 10:54 PM
  #190  
Evolved Member
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice, good job Migue!

Coming along just beautiful... your kung fu is too strong!
Old Jun 15, 2007, 04:42 AM
  #191  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by boozeup&riot

Basically, I'm wondering what plans you had in mind exactly for delivering fuel safely. This is one thing that I just don't seem to completely understand. People start talking about duty cycles and something inside just cries a little heh.

simplest way to put it:

duty cycle is the percentage of time the injectors remain open in a pulse. even wide open all the time the injectors will only flow what they can handle with the stock setup. the holes are only so big, as are the fuel passages.

you can change injectors, to get bigger holes and passages. you need to tune for the new injectors, but we can't flash the ECU so we have to tune the fuel itself with a piggyback.

if you add more fuel pressure, you can force more fuel through the injectors up to a point.

if you change injectors and add more pressure your fuel supply will increase even more.
Old Jun 15, 2007, 08:45 AM
  #192  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
migueralliart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before and after pics :



Old Jun 15, 2007, 09:19 AM
  #193  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
boozeup&riot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: you-taw
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that is quite a difference.
Old Jun 15, 2007, 09:20 AM
  #194  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Big diffrence
Old Jun 15, 2007, 09:35 AM
  #195  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't see stupid work.


Quick Reply: Cylinder Head project !!!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 AM.