Notices

importance of wheel weights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2004, 05:12 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
reimundo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CAlifornia
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do racing rim weigh about 11-15 i think ?
Old Sep 28, 2004, 06:53 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
blk-majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that would be the extreem low end. I dont think I have ever seen a 11lb rim.
Old Sep 29, 2004, 06:58 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Freddie1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bronx, New York
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone weighed the stock rims on this site - it was 23 pounds. The lightest production rims I've seen are in the 13-15 pound range (I think a 15" buddyclub weighs around that). OZ Superleggera (means superlite) weigh about 16-17 pounds - for reference.
Old Sep 29, 2004, 07:52 AM
  #19  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
blk-majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
23 is a pretty good weight for stockers. dropping 6lb per wheel would be nice.

or....

http://store.miataparts.org/koseik1ts.html

drop 18lbs =] should have a similar effect as having a new flywheel.
Old Sep 29, 2004, 09:10 PM
  #20  
Evolving Member
 
IllicitRalliart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA And FL
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by captain150
I read that on this site. Maybe it was 20-30lbs? I know it was much heavier than an aftermarket wheel. I also know an RSX rim is in the 30s, horsepower TV (or some other show) mentioned this.
You are ight on Honda RIms being that heavy.I worked at honda for a while and the Accord and Civic Rims are 20-30 Pounds.The SUV's are where it gets really Heavy.CRV is about 40lbs and the Pilot Rims are about 50-60 lbs.Mitsu has a habit of making Slightly lighter rims.I believe our Rims are between 18-22lbs. Iwill ask the Dealership tomorrow when I go to get my car inspected.
Old Oct 4, 2004, 02:48 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
jdsoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Price, UT
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lighter wheels will not give you hp to the wheels...ever. It's the same principle behind a light weight fly wheel...decreasing the rotational mass, hence increasing the revolutions per given time. You'll learn this in any engineering class when dicussing torque and horsepower.
Old Oct 24, 2004, 03:00 PM
  #22  
Evolving Member
 
silversleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hi everyone
just one quick thought if you do decrease your wheel size and go to a larger tire hight to to smaller wheel size you are getting more flex in the tire walls so your handleing would go down some just a thought if i wrong please let me know.
Old Oct 24, 2004, 05:22 PM
  #23  
Evolved Member
 
captain150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: A
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You want low profile (short sidewall) for good handling. High profile (tires on SUVs, economy cars etc) are bad for cornering, the sidewall bends and the tread loses contact with the road.
Old Oct 24, 2004, 05:27 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
pgmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
however with a larger sidewall you will get better traction for straightline launching
Old Oct 24, 2004, 06:25 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
 
turbonutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgmike
however with a larger sidewall you will get better traction for straightline launching
to a point... however if you go too large the tire will deform enough that you will actually loose grip, unless we're talking super-gummy drag slicks.
Old Nov 20, 2004, 06:55 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
petey pab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this thread seems kinda dead, but the correct equation is: for every one lb. of un-sprung weight you remove, that equates to removing 8lbs. of sprung weight. and i believe for every one hundred lbs. you remove, that equates to ABOUT .5 seconds off 1/4 mile times. so if you go from 23lb wheels and go to 17lb wheels, thats 6lbs off each corner. add it up and thats 24lbs. of un-sprung weight.......multiply it by eight.......and thats just like removing 192lbs. out of the interior of the car! which would ALMOST equal a tenth off your 1/4 mile.
Old Nov 20, 2004, 07:27 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
blk-majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
exagerated and inacurate =) doenst factor the car's power. removing 100 lbs off a RA does much less than losing 100lbs in a scion (100hp). and what do u mean by sprung weight? 2 of our wheels are part of the drive system. 2 are just to keep the back from draging =)
Old Nov 20, 2004, 07:40 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
petey pab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats why i capitalized ABOUT, so you could see that i put an emphasis on ABOUT. and sprung weight is anything being supported by the springs. and i was gonna mention something about the fact that these are only fwd vehicles, so i dont know if you could only count the weight loss off the front wheels. but i believe lighter shocks and struts will have a similar effect as lighter wheels, so i dunno? and i noticed earlier you said youd never seen 11lb wheels. i have 11lb wheels.
Old Nov 21, 2004, 02:29 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Myszkewicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,158
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by blk-majik
2 of our wheels are part of the drive system. 2 are just to keep the back from draging =)
True, the rear wheels only hold up the back end of the car. However, they're still considered rotating mass. Lighter wheels will help, even on the back of the car.

To the original poster: If you get wheels that are too light, they'll probably also be prone to breakage from daily abuse. Potholes, curbs, etc.. The highways around Chicago *suck*, and I try to avoid the holes, but you can't always see them. I've bent several stock DSM wheels in Chicago in the last 6 years. One of my friends broke one of his lightweight wheels on his Maxima.
Old Nov 21, 2004, 02:57 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
pgmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
breaking lightweight wheels is more of an issue with wheels that allow for a very short sidewall, so the rim gets more of the force than than with a larger sidewall. so if you get a 15 or 16inch wheel, you wouldnt have to worry about that as much.


Quick Reply: importance of wheel weights?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 PM.