Notices

The largest wheels you've *actually* tried on an RA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2004, 12:55 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TheJANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question The largest wheels you've *actually* tried on an RA?

First off, I've used search, many times, and haven't seen the sort of solid, real information that I need.

My inquiry is simple. For those of you who have actually installed and used 17" tires wider than 205mm or wheels wider than 7" or larger in diameter than 17", what is/was your exact wheel/tire setup? Also, if you did experience any rubbing issues, where was the rub, and under what conditions? For instance, was it in the inner fender, at the back of the tire under hard cornering? Rim of the outer fender when going over bumps?

Not looking for theory or "that probably won't work" -- I've seen plenty of posts like that I'm looking for first-hand reports from folks who have actually tried to push towards the limits.

Some sample specific questions to try to spur discussion:

1) Anybody use 18's? What wheel offset, what tire shore?
2) Anybody use 225mm tires?
3) 7.5" wheels, anyone?

I'm shopping for the best tarmac setup and want as much rubber on the ground as physically possible. So, bring it on!

PS: I'm not looking to lower the car in street trim (perhaps some variable ride height coilovers down the line, but that I'll only lower for track driving, where max. steering range is not needed).

Last edited by TheJANG; Aug 14, 2004 at 12:57 AM.
Old Aug 14, 2004, 01:37 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
insomniac_evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC & Indonesia
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
this is interesting cause i'm getting 19s in september, i think 18x8 will fit
Old Aug 14, 2004, 03:26 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xstephenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 17x7+38 with a 215/40/17. I had a 225 on the same setup but it rubbed the outer fender lip when hitting big bumps (i.e. RR tracks). I have not had any problems on the inner fender well just the outer.
Old Aug 14, 2004, 03:55 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TheJANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting. I wonder if +42 or perhaps +48 offsets would have allowed 225's to fit well.

Thanks for the informative post!
Old Aug 14, 2004, 04:16 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RollerPyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know it's not a RA, but I know a guy who had 7.5 x 18" rims on his OZ and he said they didn't rub at all. Sorry I don't know the offset or tire size. His username on here is Static.

The way I figure it is you can probably get away with a wider wheel and not experience any rubbing on the track. It's things like backing up with the steering wheel cranked all the way around that will make you rub.

Last edited by RollerPyro; Aug 14, 2004 at 04:20 PM.
Old Aug 15, 2004, 12:39 PM
  #6  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xstephenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the RA the front is not the problem. The rear fenderwell is cut to short that you really have to stay within a strict set of parameters to make it fit. I was going to swap out my wheels at Les Schwab (would have done so for the difference in $) but the ones I have are the ones I really wanted and figured a little bit of extra contact patch would not make much difference. But in the future when I get new tires I may just roll my fenders and get 225/235.
Old Aug 15, 2004, 02:40 PM
  #7  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TheJANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right on! So, perhaps, close to stock offset up front, but more + offset at the rear is the trick? For example, 17x7 +42 225/40 front, and perhaps 17x7 +48 225/40 rear.

You're saying 225's on +38 rubbed, but 215's on +38 don't. That's change of 5mm of width from centerline (of the tire) making the difference. Thus, going back to 225 but taking off at least 5mm of offset should do the trick. Perhaps even +42's would work on the rear, but +48 would definitely be safe.

Does it seem like you have plenty of clearance to your inner fenders and suspension components on the rear with your current setup?

I'm beginning to wonder if 7.5" will work up front with perhaps 225's (for a more natural contact patch).

I've got my car up on blocks right now (to finish painting the calipers), so I'll see if I can jack it up higher and do some actual measurements.
Old Aug 16, 2004, 07:30 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
 
95TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Moose Jaw, SK, Canada
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got 17x7 rims, +46 offset and 225/45ZR17 tires. Fenders are rolled out to the max but still getting some rubbing in the rear on moderate to extreme bumps. Gets really bad with any people or gear in the back seat or trunk. I'd recommend 225/40ZR17 if you're buying new rubber. I already had these on a previous car.
Going to try OZ Rally rear springs and 1" spacers as soon as I get a free weekend to install them (they're just collecting dust in the garage right now). Should give me a little more lift in the back and cure this problem. Hopefully give the car a little more aggressive stance too (1G DSM style )
Old Aug 16, 2004, 10:52 AM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xstephenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a decent amount of clearance. I don't drive very often with people in the back so whether or not it will rub with people in it is up for debate. I think 95tsi is having problems with the combination of the taller sidewall as well as the wider tire. If I was to go with a 45 sidewall instead of a 40 I would maybe rub more. However, I would think with a 46 offset he would've been fine, but I guess not.
Old Aug 16, 2004, 11:03 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
 
95TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Moose Jaw, SK, Canada
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, still catching the outer 5mm or so of the tire. Just on big, sudden bumps if the car isn't loaded down. A 40 series tire would definitely help.
Old Aug 16, 2004, 12:49 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TheJANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting. I appreciate the solid info.

The setup I'm currently scoping out is:

5zigen FZ01R-C or GN+

Front 18x7.5 +42, tires 225/35
Rear 18x7.5 +48, tires 225/35

Our stock 205/50-16's have a total diameter of 24" (or at least they should by the numbers; I'll have to check). This is the same you get from 225/40-17's and, incidentally, 225/35-18's. However, using 7.5" wheels instead of 7" would give a more relaxed, rounded shoulder, pulling the tire in & away from the fender. We shall see, though.

Need more research! Keep the data coming, guys. This is immensely helpful.
Old Aug 16, 2004, 12:59 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
954DRGSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ft. Laud, FL
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Vishnu Shop car is running the largest setup I've heard to date at 18x9.5 with 265/35/18 BFG G Force Tires. They used spacers = 3mm ones in the back and nearly 10mm up front (they installed longer wheel studs). So obviously this required some massaging to fit. Its for sale here at http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...=&cardist=2545

Vishnu has also had success with stock suspension on 5Zigen FN01RC 17x9" offset +35 255/45/17 BFG GForce KD tires.

Scratch my post above guys - I just looked at the forum and its fo RA - Sorry

Last edited by 954DRGSR; Aug 16, 2004 at 01:03 PM.
Old Aug 16, 2004, 01:30 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Freddie1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bronx, New York
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evo and RA are different.
Old Aug 17, 2004, 10:12 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mojambo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ottawa, canada
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jang,

what would suck is that if you have different offsets front and rear...you can't rotate the tires...what about getting same offset for both and use a spacer in the rear????
Old Aug 17, 2004, 12:37 PM
  #15  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TheJANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was expecting to have to get the tires physically moved from one set of wheels to the other. However, using spacers (at the front, in this case) would be a lot smarter wouldn't it


Quick Reply: The largest wheels you've *actually* tried on an RA?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 PM.