Whats the stock RA turbo capable of?
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Paris, TN
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC NFS has one... Though, I don't think I've seen him post what he paid for it.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...-ralliart.html
What he's putting down w/ the CBRD RAD turbo is in that thread somewhere...
Price wise, it's less than the BBXLite turbo, IIRC.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...-ralliart.html
What he's putting down w/ the CBRD RAD turbo is in that thread somewhere...
Price wise, it's less than the BBXLite turbo, IIRC.
Last edited by nunyas; Sep 26, 2011 at 08:24 PM.
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dayton OH
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry I was confused. I knew Brain was running a BBX lite for some reason I thought it was a TD04 though. Thanks for the correction. I think Im going to go the CBRD Rad direction so I dont have to go through the whole manifold, lines ect.. conversion.
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury ON
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been running through the advantages/disadvantages of going with the CBRD Rad vs. a BBX Lite. Expecting to pay between ~$1000-$1500 for a RAD, that puts me at or below the price of a BBX Lite, and I won't need to collect all the other parts required to make a TD05 frame turbo work, other than injectors. Putting a TD05 swap together in Canada is about 20-25% more expensive than it would be if I lived in the States. Given that I don't have a reliable source of 93-94oct fuel, and no source of E85, I don't think I'll be able to make more than 20-30whp more with a full BBX Lite swap than I would with a RAD...
Last edited by SudzRA; Sep 28, 2011 at 11:27 AM.
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
This is in no way intended to come off as fact, and this is all based on conjecture from what I've been hearing, but I was under the impression that the RAD is likely much closer to the lower end of that range, if not slightly below...
Chad would be the one with the definitive answer of course. He's only a PM away and usually replies within 24-48 hrs. Great guy if you've never dealt with him in-person yet, very helpful and willing to listen and answer all of your questions.
Chad would be the one with the definitive answer of course. He's only a PM away and usually replies within 24-48 hrs. Great guy if you've never dealt with him in-person yet, very helpful and willing to listen and answer all of your questions.
#40
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury ON
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is in no way intended to come off as fact, and this is all based on conjecture from what I've been hearing, but I was under the impression that the RAD is likely much closer to the lower end of that range, if not slightly below...
Chad would be the one with the definitive answer of course. He's only a PM away and usually replies within 24-48 hrs. Great guy if you've never dealt with him in-person yet, very helpful and willing to listen and answer all of your questions.
Chad would be the one with the definitive answer of course. He's only a PM away and usually replies within 24-48 hrs. Great guy if you've never dealt with him in-person yet, very helpful and willing to listen and answer all of your questions.
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury ON
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's some numbers from the RAD and BBX Lite
CBRD RAD, stock catback
290whp/295wtq, Mustang dyno (no mention of gas type)
Ridesober
292whp/300wtq
CBRD says that they lost ~20whp/20wtq due to stock intake and exhaust.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...d-turbo-3.html
Other resource (posted above by nunyas):
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...alliart-2.html
Bryan (Razorlab) BBX Lite
320whp/275wtq, Mustang dyno, 91oct, stock catback
370whp/326wtq, Mustang dyno, E85, stock catback
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...sportback.html
CBRD RAD, stock catback
290whp/295wtq, Mustang dyno (no mention of gas type)
Ridesober
292whp/300wtq
CBRD says that they lost ~20whp/20wtq due to stock intake and exhaust.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...d-turbo-3.html
Other resource (posted above by nunyas):
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...alliart-2.html
Bryan (Razorlab) BBX Lite
320whp/275wtq, Mustang dyno, 91oct, stock catback
370whp/326wtq, Mustang dyno, E85, stock catback
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...sportback.html
Last edited by SudzRA; Sep 30, 2011 at 11:53 AM.
#42
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Exactly, core exchange will definitely make the difference. Just from what I remember, the whole purpose was supposed to be a cost-effective alternative to a basic X swap with slightly more output than a stock X turbo. With the average X swap costing in the ~$1200 range (from what I've been seeing/hearing), I figure the RAD to be slightly less if you are exchanging your turbo as a core replacement.
#44
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Essentially nothing other than a tune. You can technically run it on an otherwise completely stock car, though to see it's full potential, you'd need other basic supporting mods like intake, exhaust, fmic and piping, etc. Then once you get to that level where you're pushing the turbo for what it's worth, it's been said that larger injectors are required and a fuel pump wouldn't hurt either. But for starters, you'd be able to put it in, have it tuned, and just go from there.
#45
Essentially nothing other than a tune. You can technically run it on an otherwise completely stock car, though to see it's full potential, you'd need other basic supporting mods like intake, exhaust, fmic and piping, etc. Then once you get to that level where you're pushing the turbo for what it's worth, it's been said that larger injectors are required and a fuel pump wouldn't hurt either. But for starters, you'd be able to put it in, have it tuned, and just go from there.