Intake...even worth it?
#31
Does the car make more power than stock with an intake - YES
Does the car make more power than stock with a tune - YES
Does the car make more power with an intake and a tune than just tuned - YES
That will be a dollar from everyone on this thread for lesson time.
A quality intake will make more power becuase it allows the car to pull more air and let the ECU account for it by making the neccessary adjustments.
A drop in is a good, simple example. Stock housing, easier flow for the motor to pull from, within the limits of the ECU. Power made.
Does the car make more power than stock with a tune - YES
Does the car make more power with an intake and a tune than just tuned - YES
That will be a dollar from everyone on this thread for lesson time.
A quality intake will make more power becuase it allows the car to pull more air and let the ECU account for it by making the neccessary adjustments.
A drop in is a good, simple example. Stock housing, easier flow for the motor to pull from, within the limits of the ECU. Power made.
On a side note, as I understand it: Our cars will see initial power with an intake because it leans out the AFR (as TTP said). However, the ecu will start to compensate for the added air flow, and eventually, the gains you see from an intake will be minimal at best. The only way to see true, sustained power is by tuning the ECU and MAF to run a leaner AFR, so the ECU doesn't feel the need to readjust back to factory AFR (rich). The tuners are free to correct me on this, but this is my understanding.
And, the above is why running an intake that circumvents the MAF's ability to detect the amount of air actually being flowed without getting a tune is dangerous. Running 14:1 AFR and such...
#33
#34
ON top of that, i belong to a large evo club and spend alot of time working on them and have for the last few years.
At the end of the day though my friend, Its research and common sense.
#35
wait no longer, ive tuned a handful 6-8 srt-4's (granted there is no "maf") and was very proficient with HP tuners on the LSJ.
ON top of that, i belong to a large evo club and spend alot of time working on them and have for the last few years.
At the end of the day though my friend, Its research and common sense.
ON top of that, i belong to a large evo club and spend alot of time working on them and have for the last few years.
At the end of the day though my friend, Its research and common sense.
Let's break down the facts:
- The RA's I/C is tiny.
- The RA's turbo is small.
- The RA's ECU is a neural-net processor... a learning computer: It will compensate for leaner conditions over time.
- The RA has a hot wire MAF that the ECU uses to measure AFR; some intakes throw off the MAF, meaning the ECU can't properly account for AFR and the RAs run dangerously lean without a tune.
- All of the current intakes suck air from inside the engine bay.
- The stock airbox sucks air from outside the engine bay.
To end, we still do not have side-by-side comparisons of the same car, on the same dyno, tuned with and tuned without an intake. Until we do, your "guarantee" that an intake = more power (i.e., the stock airbox is the bottleneck) on the RA is unverifiable. Could the stock airbox eventually be a bottleneck? Sure, but that is probably very far down the line in upgrade priorities.
Until someone whom I respect as a tuner in the Mitsu community corrects me, I'm not changing my opinion. I just hate the idea of people running out to spend $300 + on an intake when there are, potentially, much more beneficial mods for the money.
#36
it's not making logical decisions and learning from them to make it smarter or solve problems faster. It's changing parameters based on how far +/- it is off a set standard. That's it.
I do like the terminator franchise as much as the next geek though.
#37
hahha I wouldn't go that far.
it's not making logical decisions and learning from them to make it smarter or solve problems faster. It's changing parameters based on how far +/- it is off a set standard. That's it.
I do like the terminator franchise as much as the next geek though.
it's not making logical decisions and learning from them to make it smarter or solve problems faster. It's changing parameters based on how far +/- it is off a set standard. That's it.
I do like the terminator franchise as much as the next geek though.
#39
LOL^^^
I will say, airfilters ALWAYS pose resistance to airflow, some less than others. I'm with second chance that it fascilitates the improvements, but thats not where all the gains a 24 lb/m setup sees from the filter comes from. It makes sense that it simply leans the mixture out some and thats where most of the HP comes from.
I would be more apt to believe that theory in a higher HP car. Say, around 35lbs/min or so.
I will say, airfilters ALWAYS pose resistance to airflow, some less than others. I'm with second chance that it fascilitates the improvements, but thats not where all the gains a 24 lb/m setup sees from the filter comes from. It makes sense that it simply leans the mixture out some and thats where most of the HP comes from.
I would be more apt to believe that theory in a higher HP car. Say, around 35lbs/min or so.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kraig
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
11
Apr 22, 2009 05:14 PM
RedLanEVO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
8
Nov 26, 2007 08:34 PM
recompile
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
168
Jul 3, 2007 10:34 AM