2009 Lancer Ralliart - GST Basemap
#47
yea I run 93. Ill try and do some logs ASAP and get them to you.
wait, nevermind. I have full exhaust. That will throw off the test base.
wait, nevermind. I have full exhaust. That will throw off the test base.
Last edited by elpoole; Sep 2, 2009 at 07:35 PM.
#50
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Driving around all day and looking at my average fuel consumption. This was without using heavy throttle. I was getting around 10.8L/100km with your tune, around 13.8 with TTP's tune, and no tune I was in the low 11's. These were all done around the same temperature (around 25oC) and same driving route.
#51
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
If you have not tried shell 91, it is worth a try. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. I have tried all the main brands around and gave them all a strict month trial period. The shell gas imo gives me BY FAR the best fuel economy and is a decent amount snappier than the husky.
#52
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Driving around all day and looking at my average fuel consumption. This was without using heavy throttle. I was getting around 10.8L/100km with your tune, around 13.8 with TTP's tune, and no tune I was in the low 11's. These were all done around the same temperature (around 25oC) and same driving route.
GST base map Rom you where burning 10.8L/100km
Your other vendor map Rom you where burning 13.8L/100km
So using approx 1L less per 100km over stock with our base map? Seems about right.
Wonder why the other vendor map was so much more per 100km. Did you do the same type of driving for that data as well?
Thanks for the feedback
#53
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All data was tested using the same driving habbits. I didn't floor it or bag on the car at all, just a casual drive to and from work.
I believe TTP put my boost to around 20-21 PSI, in which they would make it a little more rich. That's really my only guess.
I was comparing both tunes side by side on ECUFlash, both are completely unique. Especially in the boost settings. Completely different styles of tuning. I honestly thought that your tune (GST) was going to work better because it looked nicer. Much smoother transitions in the MIVEC and such.
I believe TTP put my boost to around 20-21 PSI, in which they would make it a little more rich. That's really my only guess.
I was comparing both tunes side by side on ECUFlash, both are completely unique. Especially in the boost settings. Completely different styles of tuning. I honestly thought that your tune (GST) was going to work better because it looked nicer. Much smoother transitions in the MIVEC and such.
#58
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im not trying too, and i missed the section where he mentioned that it was under normal driving.
More then likely, thats due to the tuner not being more thorough on that section and having focused more on the top end.
$399.99 only goes so far.