My Ralliart Stage 1 Upgrade @RRM/RRE
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
This thread seemed to be one giant dig at RRE's dyno and methodology.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...o-run-rre.html
In that thread, you seemed to imply that the dyno wasn't being used to properly because we only did a baseline reading. You seemed amenable to the idea of having a baseline versus tuned reading, but now you are complaining again. I just don't get it.
Just tell Mike the power output you want a stock RA to have on the RRE dyno... I'm sure he could take a torch, bust into his dyno, and mess around with it until stock RAs are only putting down 190 whp.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...o-run-rre.html
In that thread, you seemed to imply that the dyno wasn't being used to properly because we only did a baseline reading. You seemed amenable to the idea of having a baseline versus tuned reading, but now you are complaining again. I just don't get it.
Just tell Mike the power output you want a stock RA to have on the RRE dyno... I'm sure he could take a torch, bust into his dyno, and mess around with it until stock RAs are only putting down 190 whp.
You are aware that secondchance and I are not the same person, right?
#20
iTrader: (27)
One thing missing is the octane used on those pulls. 91 or 93?
I baselined 200 WHP and 223 ft/lbs and left 241 WHP and 241 ft/lbs because I am a noobie and did not know how to adjust for the Limp Mode crap that Mitsu added to the new ECU. Oh well!
I am pretty sure that I can get 260 WHP and 245 ft/lbs when I go back to the dyno again, now that I figured out (Thanks GST Motorsports) how to disble and adjust the tables to prevent/eliminate the Limp Mode.
With that been said, I think that the gains achieved by RRE are very similar to mine at similar boost level. I was on 93.
I baselined 200 WHP and 223 ft/lbs and left 241 WHP and 241 ft/lbs because I am a noobie and did not know how to adjust for the Limp Mode crap that Mitsu added to the new ECU. Oh well!
I am pretty sure that I can get 260 WHP and 245 ft/lbs when I go back to the dyno again, now that I figured out (Thanks GST Motorsports) how to disble and adjust the tables to prevent/eliminate the Limp Mode.
With that been said, I think that the gains achieved by RRE are very similar to mine at similar boost level. I was on 93.
#23
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
This Magnaflow muffler far outflows the capacity of the stock RA turbo. For a guy staying with a stock cat and stock turbo, the car dynos the same with this **** poor muffler as it does a straight pipe back there.
Originally Posted by joedr
One thing missing is the octane used on those pulls. 91 or 93?
We only get 91 octane here in California.
Mike W
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But bringing this back to topic again:
Mike, do you think that Magnaflow system would work well with an EVO X turbo swap?
#25
Love that exhaust! RRE are you planing on pre-manufacturing the axle back for sale? And if so what kind of price would we be talking about for it? The exhaust and FMIC look like a great fitment. What do you guys have planned down the ROAD for the R/A? And how much was the X FMIC?
I had to quote myself. Any thing on answers to any of my question? Except from anyone that owns a subby.
#26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're probably going to have to wait for Mike to get back on to answer some of those questions. From the sounds of it, a lot of their work is custom, so I don't know if they would be able to prefab it and send it to you.
#27
That's kinda what I was thinking, but hoping for the best. The axle back and X FMIC are my next two mods. Just trying to find the best bang for the buck. And RRM was where 90% of the mods on my GTS came from so..........
#29
anyone that wants to buy evo x stock fmic and piping shut me a pm i have one for sale 300 for the kit pick up or 340 shipped anywhere in u s A
check this post on evo x forums
http://www.evoxforums /forums/showthread.php?t=21517
check this post on evo x forums
http://www.evoxforums /forums/showthread.php?t=21517
#30
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: up north eh
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread seemed to be one giant dig at RRE's dyno and methodology.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...o-run-rre.html
In that thread, you seemed to imply that the dyno wasn't being used to properly because we only did a baseline reading. You seemed amenable to the idea of having a baseline versus tuned reading, but now you are complaining again. I just don't get it.
Just tell Mike the power output you want a stock RA to have on the RRE dyno... I'm sure he could take a torch, bust into his dyno, and mess around with it until stock RAs are only putting down 190 whp.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...o-run-rre.html
In that thread, you seemed to imply that the dyno wasn't being used to properly because we only did a baseline reading. You seemed amenable to the idea of having a baseline versus tuned reading, but now you are complaining again. I just don't get it.
Just tell Mike the power output you want a stock RA to have on the RRE dyno... I'm sure he could take a torch, bust into his dyno, and mess around with it until stock RAs are only putting down 190 whp.
if he did that, he would have a properly running dyno, as the numbers might be 4-5 low, which is alot better then 20-25 over.
I agree, the baseline is way to high to support the outcome, but the gains are nice.
congrats on that fact!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bmanuhutu
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
55
Dec 14, 2009 10:27 PM
DC_TypeR
Evo X Dyno Results
17
Sep 4, 2009 02:37 PM
gt40
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
6
Aug 19, 2009 11:47 AM