346whp uncorrected '09 Ralliart Evo X turbo tuned by TTP!
Oct 28, 2009, 08:51 AM
#61
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: up north eh
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess when you pay to be a vendor the rules don't apply?
At any rate, i've yet to see a track slip to back up the claims. Ams tunes seem to be running 13.5. Ams themselves ran a 13.2 i believe. If the car is truly making that much power, 13.2 or lower is the number we should see. Especially at sea level.
Once those numbers became real or unobtainable which ever is the case... then the problem is solved.
Oct 28, 2009, 09:22 AM
#62
So now your bashing where i work?
I guess when you pay to be a vendor the rules don't apply?
At any rate, i've yet to see a track slip to back up the claims. Ams tunes seem to be running 13.5. Ams themselves ran a 13.2 i believe. If the car is truly making that much power, 13.2 or lower is the number we should see. Especially at sea level.
Once those numbers became real or unobtainable which ever is the case... then the problem is solved.
I guess when you pay to be a vendor the rules don't apply?
At any rate, i've yet to see a track slip to back up the claims. Ams tunes seem to be running 13.5. Ams themselves ran a 13.2 i believe. If the car is truly making that much power, 13.2 or lower is the number we should see. Especially at sea level.
Once those numbers became real or unobtainable which ever is the case... then the problem is solved.
Oct 28, 2009, 10:25 AM
#64
there goes thirdchance's account.... let's keep our eyes peeled for fourthchance 
I get what you say but look, it's Izzy's car like TTP says, so it is ultimately the power he wants to be pushing on his car. At this point, we should all rejoice cause we had someone with the ***** to push it above "supposed" transmission limits. Now, I also agree with you on this: he's our Guinea Pig! So, its a matter of time until we see what happens with his tranny
I already stated above that our tranny has to be the exact same thing on an MR and the MR is already doing over 300lbs stock
Originally Posted by Taranis
The thing I would be concerned about is the long-term reliability of the transmission at those power levels. Yes it may hold it now, but how long will that last? Would hate to have to spend the 10k to get a new transmission long before it would normally be due, as that makes the relatively cheap turbo swap quickly become a whole lot more expensive!
And I'm not hating on anyone. This is just a question I would be wondering about if I was seeking those high numbers. =)
-Taranis
And I'm not hating on anyone. This is just a question I would be wondering about if I was seeking those high numbers. =)
-Taranis
I already stated above that our tranny has to be the exact same thing on an MR and the MR is already doing over 300lbs stock
Oct 28, 2009, 10:52 AM
#66
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there goes thirdchance's account.... let's keep our eyes peeled for fourthchance
I get what you say but look, it's Izzy's car like TTP says, so it is ultimately the power he wants to be pushing on his car. At this point, we should all rejoice cause we had someone with the ***** to push it above "supposed" transmission limits. Now, I also agree with you on this: he's our Guinea Pig! So, its a matter of time until we see what happens with his tranny
I already stated above that our tranny has to be the exact same thing on an MR and the MR is already doing over 300lbs stock
I get what you say but look, it's Izzy's car like TTP says, so it is ultimately the power he wants to be pushing on his car. At this point, we should all rejoice cause we had someone with the ***** to push it above "supposed" transmission limits. Now, I also agree with you on this: he's our Guinea Pig! So, its a matter of time until we see what happens with his tranny
I already stated above that our tranny has to be the exact same thing on an MR and the MR is already doing over 300lbs stock
annnyywwaayyss.. Awesome numbers TTP!! how r u looking to fix the shifting problem? The torque is not letting the car shift on time so my question is what makes the MR able to? s-sport?
Oct 28, 2009, 12:23 PM
#68
i very much agree with this.. but can we accurately call him a guinea pig? Is it possible for some SST's to be stronger then others (or should i say more reliable)? What i mean by this is if i did the same mods to my car and went and got the same tune.. would are "lives" of r transmission still be similar?
annnyywwaayyss.. Awesome numbers TTP!! how r u looking to fix the shifting problem? The torque is not letting the car shift on time so my question is what makes the MR able to? s-sport?
annnyywwaayyss.. Awesome numbers TTP!! how r u looking to fix the shifting problem? The torque is not letting the car shift on time so my question is what makes the MR able to? s-sport?
I think the less load you put on the TC-SST with such numbers the longer it'd last. And I think Izzy only bangs the crap out of his RA when he's at the drag strip (I think!)
Different SST software tables. Clamp rate and requested torque load vs clamp rate, etc.
- Bryan
- Bryan
Oct 28, 2009, 01:44 PM
#69
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i struggle to find this as a positive. You payed someone to tune your car so it could function and be reliable. The power numbers are cute.. 115 whp gain is nice, but at what cost? one would think 80-90 whp gain and lower torque gains that stay within the sst's comfort zone would have made for a better story/ driving experience.
Last edited by 8urSuby; Oct 28, 2009 at 01:56 PM.
I kill your account like a caca roach STARZ!!
Oct 29, 2009, 05:54 AM
#75
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ramstein Ab
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So now your bashing where i work?
I guess when you pay to be a vendor the rules don't apply?
At any rate, i've yet to see a track slip to back up the claims. Ams tunes seem to be running 13.5. Ams themselves ran a 13.2 i believe. If the car is truly making that much power, 13.2 or lower is the number we should see. Especially at sea level.
Once those numbers became real or unobtainable which ever is the case... then the problem is solved.
I guess when you pay to be a vendor the rules don't apply?
At any rate, i've yet to see a track slip to back up the claims. Ams tunes seem to be running 13.5. Ams themselves ran a 13.2 i believe. If the car is truly making that much power, 13.2 or lower is the number we should see. Especially at sea level.
Once those numbers became real or unobtainable which ever is the case... then the problem is solved.
^that was with JUST a tune and pill.
I too would like to see a timeslip, especially now since 8ursuby is at 340+
I dont think anyone has posted a slip with that much WHP from an RA yet.