Notices

CP-E catback + AMS HFC =

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2012, 03:32 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Immaculate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CP-E catback + AMS HFC =

Absolutely amazing!!! The sound is orgasmic. Quiet when you need it and absolutely screams when your on it. The tone is very deep and throaty I love it. Oh and I have zero drone. Great products to both companies!

I think I peed a little....
Old Mar 24, 2012, 07:43 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Immaculate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One question just got a CEL could be from the sensor?
Old Mar 24, 2012, 09:03 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
Alien Visitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe it's because of the o2 sensor in your HFC. The mechanical fix for that would be that o2 sensor extender thing. I think a tuner could turn it off when you get it tuned, too.
Old Mar 25, 2012, 06:14 AM
  #4  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Steven_Trujillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Frisco Tx
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ive tried the o2 spacer on my set up but it comes on every 30 miles. :/ idk what to do i need some help on this one too.
Old Mar 25, 2012, 10:40 AM
  #5  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Immaculate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had bought one of those code readers last year so it was a good time to try it. The code it read was for the cat so I cleared it but I'm sure it will come back.
Old Mar 25, 2012, 12:57 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
03chi-town0Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burbs, Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Use the 90* spacer option. That's what I'm running on my setup and haven't thrown a cat code in over 2 years... *touch wood*
Old Mar 25, 2012, 02:32 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Steven_Trujillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Frisco Tx
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
any links where to get one?
Old Mar 25, 2012, 06:42 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
splattj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Allendale, MI
Posts: 1,018
Received 113 Likes on 101 Posts
They have them on ebay.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=...All-Categories
Old Mar 25, 2012, 07:03 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
03chi-town0Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burbs, Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Yup, worth every penny, imo
Old Mar 25, 2012, 07:03 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Steven_Trujillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Frisco Tx
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
doesnt this do the same thing as the spacer from AMS? thats the one I have and im still having the CEL on :/
Old Mar 25, 2012, 08:06 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
03chi-town0Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burbs, Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Sort of, but it's a bit different. The AMS spacer restricts the amount of exhaust flow to the sensor by closing off the hole that feeds the sensor, this variant physically moves the sensor further out from the direct exhaust stream and allows for multiple position configurations to combat whichever code you are throwing.

I would recommend installing the sensor extender facing downstream, towards the back of the car, especially if you are running a HFC, because you don't want to take it too far and throw the O2 sensor activity code. Some people with aggressive setups with test pipes who still see P0420 codes even with standard spacers may want to use it with the "L" facing upstream to remove it from the exhaust flow as much as possible.

The other benefit of this style is that if you are seeing your typical P0420 code and you add this spacer with the "L" facing upstream, furthest from the flow of exhaust or a regular spacer (or two) with a tiny hole, sometimes it restricts it too much and then you get the O2 sensor response code instead of the cat code. With the 90* spacer, you would then just flip the position 180* so it is downstream (pointing to the back) and sees just slightly more exhaust flow so it doesn't think the sensor is inactive but is still far enough out where it doesn't throw the catalyst code.
Old Mar 26, 2012, 08:12 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Immaculate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will have to pick one up thanks for the info. I haven't gotten the code again since I cleared it but might as well solve the issue for good. I hate seeing that damn light haha

Last edited by Immaculate; Mar 26, 2012 at 08:35 AM.
Old Apr 1, 2012, 08:36 PM
  #13  
Newbie
 
fireguy1578's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spokane
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03chi-town0Z
Some people with aggressive setups with test pipes who still see P0420 codes even with standard spacers may want to use it with the "L" facing upstream to remove it from the exhaust flow as much as possible.
6 months CEL free this way. Its worth the cost to keep that light from coming on.
Old Apr 2, 2012, 12:13 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Immaculate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmmm


Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Seifer780
Lancer How To Requests / Questions / Tips
3
Jan 10, 2017 09:21 PM
ChipperEvo
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Mar 5, 2015 11:26 AM
stiggysaurus
Northeast Region
5
May 16, 2014 11:38 AM
Rudager
Evo X Show / Shine
16
Apr 17, 2008 10:04 AM
jsfour
Lancer General
10
Jun 2, 2004 02:07 AM



Quick Reply: CP-E catback + AMS HFC =



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:25 PM.