2010 AS Ralliart build
lmfao just kidin
Mar 6, 2011, 02:18 PM
#49
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: shreveport, la
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my first xswap tune numbers were about the same as yours. going back with a walboro 255 pump and 900cc injectors hoping to get more out of her. torque limiter also kept kicking in but hes spent some time figuring it out and giong back this wknd. getting it both street tuned and putting it on a mustang dyno. will have the comparisons and everything this wknd
Mar 7, 2011, 01:18 PM
#52
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my first xswap tune numbers were about the same as yours. going back with a walboro 255 pump and 900cc injectors hoping to get more out of her. torque limiter also kept kicking in but hes spent some time figuring it out and giong back this wknd. getting it both street tuned and putting it on a mustang dyno. will have the comparisons and everything this wknd
and no i didnt take your bov thats one of the very few things i didnt take lol
Mar 24, 2011, 08:29 PM
#54
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
now i want a louder bov (cause im a ricer like that lol)
ecu controlled boost and a catback and im done with performance mods for now
*update: hopefully getting a set of x plugs next week and going in for a retune asap caint wait to see if it ll make a difference
Mar 26, 2011, 08:03 AM
#55
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sioux falls, South Dakota
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well i had to tune mine down . . it hit 353 wheel and the tranny started slipping, i could've gone to 400 but my tranny would have been ****ed . . so just to be safe we de tuned it to around 315 : (
Mar 26, 2011, 09:37 AM
#56
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
still 315/330 are good numbers but again that was done on a dynojet dyno if i go by your sig so if you dynoed on mustang dyno like did your numbers would be prety close to mine
Mar 27, 2011, 12:09 PM
#58
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sioux falls, South Dakota
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
razorlab.. i cant really describe slipping that well basically the dynograph just looks funky and my tuner said "see that drop off there, thats where it starts slipping" so idk how you can reach those numbers with no problem congrats to you man!. . and baggelis i wasnt tryin to like beat you with numbers i know that mustang dynos read lower and keep in mind mine has plenty more potential with my setup . . im not even on stock evo x boost yet i had to get a boost controller to turn down the boost even farther
Mar 27, 2011, 03:08 PM
#59
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
razorlab.. i cant really describe slipping that well basically the dynograph just looks funky and my tuner said "see that drop off there, thats where it starts slipping" so idk how you can reach those numbers with no problem congrats to you man!. . and baggelis i wasnt tryin to like beat you with numbers i know that mustang dynos read lower and keep in mind mine has plenty more potential with my setup . . im not even on stock evo x boost yet i had to get a boost controller to turn down the boost even farther