2.0l, 37r???
#16
Originally Posted by KOEvo
I thought Buschur's black drag car used to be a built 2.0 w/ 37R. It would be simple to just search and look back at previous BR posts and find dyno's and track times.
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: The burbs of our nation's capital
680 hp GT-35R 82mm 56 0.70 Ball Bearing 68mm 84 0.82, 1.06
700 hp GT-37 76mm, 82mm 52 0.54, 0.70 Standard 72.5mm 84 1.12
750 hp GT-40 82mm, 88mm 50, 54 0.58, 0.72 Standard 77mm 73, 84 0.94, 1.34
1100 hp GT-42 94mm, 102mm 53, 56 0.60 Standard 82mm 84 1.15
1100 hp GT42R 94mm, 102mm 53, 56 0.60 Ball Bearing 82mm 84 1.15
1450 hp GT-47 108mm, 117.5mm 56 0.69 Standard 93mm 82 .96, 1.08
1600 hp GT-55 91mm 48
2200 hp GT-60
something like that ?
700 hp GT-37 76mm, 82mm 52 0.54, 0.70 Standard 72.5mm 84 1.12
750 hp GT-40 82mm, 88mm 50, 54 0.58, 0.72 Standard 77mm 73, 84 0.94, 1.34
1100 hp GT-42 94mm, 102mm 53, 56 0.60 Standard 82mm 84 1.15
1100 hp GT42R 94mm, 102mm 53, 56 0.60 Ball Bearing 82mm 84 1.15
1450 hp GT-47 108mm, 117.5mm 56 0.69 Standard 93mm 82 .96, 1.08
1600 hp GT-55 91mm 48
2200 hp GT-60
something like that ?
#23
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
I have a customer that street races out here that would like to remain annonymous but with 1000CC injectrors on a built 2.0 and our AMS 37R kit it put down 658 whp. Spool was much quicker then we had anticipated. I will try and get his dyno sheet with his name removed to show you guys.
Eric
Eric
#25
Quote:
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
I have a customer that street races out here that would like to remain annonymous but with 1000CC injectrors on a built 2.0 and our AMS 37R kit it put down 658 whp. Spool was much quicker then we had anticipated. I will try and get his dyno sheet with his name removed to show you guys.
Eric
Is that on race gas? Or pump?
__________________
Stealth EVO!
That would have to be on C-16 race gas for sure!
I have a 2.3 with 1600's and it put down 708whp and Martin could have got a few more out of it but because of DD he backed off a little.
If I had gone with 1000cc the turbo would have maxed out at what Eric quoted above. (658whp).
Martin set the redline at 8500rpms and pulls very hard right up to it. Spools up quick and lag is very little.
With a built 2.0 and 1000cc's the numbers Eric quoted above (658whp) would probably be just about dead on as far as what you could expect. Every car is a little different as you know.
Whatever set up you go with, you can't go wrong with AMS. They are a first class shop and stand behind their work.
Hope this helps.
Good luck
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
I have a customer that street races out here that would like to remain annonymous but with 1000CC injectrors on a built 2.0 and our AMS 37R kit it put down 658 whp. Spool was much quicker then we had anticipated. I will try and get his dyno sheet with his name removed to show you guys.
Eric
Is that on race gas? Or pump?
__________________
Stealth EVO!
That would have to be on C-16 race gas for sure!
I have a 2.3 with 1600's and it put down 708whp and Martin could have got a few more out of it but because of DD he backed off a little.
If I had gone with 1000cc the turbo would have maxed out at what Eric quoted above. (658whp).
Martin set the redline at 8500rpms and pulls very hard right up to it. Spools up quick and lag is very little.
With a built 2.0 and 1000cc's the numbers Eric quoted above (658whp) would probably be just about dead on as far as what you could expect. Every car is a little different as you know.
Whatever set up you go with, you can't go wrong with AMS. They are a first class shop and stand behind their work.
Hope this helps.
Good luck
Last edited by WhtEvo05; Aug 28, 2006 at 01:56 AM.
#27
Originally Posted by Ackerson
Does anybody know when it will spool on a 2.0 with the .82 T3 housing?
Now Presicion release a newer version
On a ball Bering PT67/67 or PT67/76 both available on T3 /.63ar ,.82a/r = exactly like the GT37R !? or T4.68ar,.81a/r the = like the GT40R!?
My advice is go with either one of them GT35R-GT37R from AMS aplication they are excellent!
Last edited by ProccoEVO; Sep 6, 2006 at 07:38 AM.
#28
Damn...SHearer said I could get the BB T-67 for 100 bucks cheaper than the 35r...So my project looks to be leaning towrds the BB T-67 with the SHearer mani on my stock bottom end lol!
#29
Originally Posted by tony gibson
Damn...SHearer said I could get the BB T-67 for 100 bucks cheaper than the 35r...So my project looks to be leaning towrds the BB T-67 with the SHearer mani on my stock bottom end lol!