Notices
Automotosports - Illinois Automotosports is a Chicago based tuner specializing in 4G63T performance. With an in-house fabrication facility and engineers on staff, they will be bringing you the best in Lancer Evolution parts.

2.0l, 37r???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:01 AM
  #31  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Yes plenty for the street and plenty for a built 2.0 when the time comes.
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 09:53 AM
  #32  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Originally Posted by Jasil
^^^^^^^
More like 725awhp maxxed out still more than enough except for the 100% drag EVO.
ISP did it
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #33  
KevPSR's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
I want a ride in a 37r car
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #34  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
Originally Posted by Ang Wen Yan
ISP did it
The track times did not align with the 800whp dyno if I remember correctly. Lastly, compressor maps don't lie and when AMS tunes a 37R to the tune of 710awhp I doubt seriously that another shop is able to magically pull out a extra 90whp all IMO.
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 03:40 AM
  #35  
CBRE's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 618
Likes: 3
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I have a 2.0 and the 37r now, picked up 3mph first time out without re-dyno tuning, but due to poor local track conditions could not really better the et, ran 9.33. Upside is slowest it went was 153.5!
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 05:45 AM
  #36  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
That's awesome Curt!!
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 06:32 AM
  #37  
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,354
Likes: 2
From: New York City
Originally Posted by CBRE
I have a 2.0 and the 37r now, picked up 3mph first time out without re-dyno tuning, but due to poor local track conditions could not really better the et, ran 9.33. Upside is slowest it went was 153.5!

how does the car feel in traffic, daily driving scenarios on a 2.0L and GT37R?

I'm on a 2.0L and 50 Trim now.... and I'm curious to see how different the car will feel.
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 06:46 AM
  #38  
CBRE's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 618
Likes: 3
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Blue Evo 8
how does the car feel in traffic, daily driving scenarios on a 2.0L and GT37R?

I'm on a 2.0L and 50 Trim now.... and I'm curious to see how different the car will feel.
I drove it there on pump at 23 psi, OK spool-up, pulls good, keep the 50 trim if it's a street car, 37r is close to race only unless you run race gas all the time.
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 07:07 AM
  #39  
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,354
Likes: 2
From: New York City
Originally Posted by CBRE
I drove it there on pump at 23 psi, OK spool-up, pulls good, keep the 50 trim if it's a street car, 37r is close to race only unless you run race gas all the time.

I run 93 + methanol injection all the time.... could I still get away with the 37R to make it a worthwhile step up over the 50 trim????
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #40  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
WOW CURT!!!

That is amazing. You are a damn freak of nature behind the wheel of that car.

Eric
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 08:57 AM
  #41  
KOEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I would like to know if this combo is more effecient then a 35r on a stock bottum end.

So say 35r vs 37r @ 31 psi on racegas. What would net more power?
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 10:53 AM
  #42  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Originally Posted by CBRE
I have a 2.0 and the 37r now, picked up 3mph first time out without re-dyno tuning, but due to poor local track conditions could not really better the et, ran 9.33. Upside is slowest it went was 153.5!
Good job man...never seize to amaze me lol.
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #43  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Originally Posted by KOEvo
I would like to know if this combo is more effecient then a 35r on a stock bottum end.

So say 35r vs 37r @ 31 psi on racegas. What would net more power?
x2....I will be doing the BB T67 from Shearer...full boost by 5-5500rpm is good for me!
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #44  
LI Pinky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 854
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, New York
decisions...decisions...

When my build time finally does come i am throwing around two options, 35r and a 50 trim...I am looking for 500-600 awhp and i know that this is much more practical with the 35r but damn bang for your buck and not having to buy a stroker or build the motor...50 trim's are making just under 500 and are spoooling a a greeaat rate with stock bottum ends and stock 2.0l's! Good thing i not doing this anytime in the next year...lol i hae a lot of thinking to do
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #45  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Go big or go home lol....IMO as long as you rev to 8500 rpm and have the supporting mods, go with the big T3 set ups on the stock 2.0 i.e 35r, 37r, bb T67.


Quick Reply: 2.0l, 37r???



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 AM.