Notices
Automotosports - Illinois Automotosports is a Chicago based tuner specializing in 4G63T performance. With an in-house fabrication facility and engineers on staff, they will be bringing you the best in Lancer Evolution parts.

60 WHP Gain with AMS VSR!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2007, 12:21 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
dafunk630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn!!!! is the VSR manifold fit the IX????
Old Jan 30, 2007, 12:27 PM
  #17  
AMS
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock TB.

I appologize about the 30R, I meant to say it a certain version of the GT30R that we use. I said this because there are a bunch of different 30R's that can be configured. The one we use in our kit is the same one I used in these tests.
Old Jan 30, 2007, 12:39 PM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by dafunk630
damn!!!! is the VSR manifold fit the IX????
It fits the IX just fine

Eric
Old Jan 30, 2007, 06:02 PM
  #19  
Newbie
 
RAM1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What throttle body did you use in this test. I have been thinking about getting this intake for my setup. I wanted to use a 70mm T.B. I would like to see what kind of gains this intake would give me. I have a similar engine setup.
Old Feb 5, 2007, 02:17 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nez136
I think MalibuJack is running a Sheet metal intake mani as well on the stock ecu. Im sure they have both done something custom for the EGR valve otherwise the car would run like crap.
EGR is simply disabled with the VSR Intake manifold (read: you will throw an EGR cel), but it has not affected driveability at all. I am running on the stock ECU (tuned with ECUflash) and did not have to change the idle tuning at all when going from the stock manifold to the AMS VSR manifold. I am using a 65mm TB (i.e., stock TB bored to 65mm).

My only gripe (albeit very minor) with the VSR intake so far has been that it should have come stock with a PCV valve attachment (something I had AMS add after the initial install).

l8r)
Old Feb 5, 2007, 04:05 PM
  #21  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
funnyclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So do they have the pcv valve attachment on them now?
Old Feb 5, 2007, 04:35 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
socalmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this works with a stock fuel rail, right?
Old Feb 5, 2007, 05:21 PM
  #23  
Account Disabled
 
Vigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should horsepower and torque be about the same with a GT30 turbo and a 2.3 liter set-up? Do you have to run more boost for that happen?

Last edited by Vigo; Feb 5, 2007 at 05:32 PM.
Old Feb 5, 2007, 06:33 PM
  #24  
Account Disabled
 
Vigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what happened to all the torque?
Old Feb 5, 2007, 10:42 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by funnyclub
So do they have the pcv valve attachment on them now?
I don't think so, but you can tell them to add one when you buy the intake.

l8r)
Old Feb 5, 2007, 10:44 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vigo
So what happened to all the torque?
Not sure what you are alluding to. The 2.3RR setup that AMS dynoed at the beginning of this thread is a road racing engine that is shooting for a nice wide and flat powerband, which is pretty much what you see in the dyno...

l8r)
Old Feb 5, 2007, 10:52 PM
  #27  
Account Disabled
 
Vigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disregard my previous post! I just read the graph wrong! Oops.
Old Feb 5, 2007, 10:57 PM
  #28  
Account Disabled
 
Vigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I did read it right. What I was trying to say is, when you combine a GT30 turbo with 2.3 liters of displacement you will usually get horsepower that is equal to torque. Am I right? Scorke has a GT3076 turbo combined with a 2.3 liter stroker. With that set-up his power and torque levels were almost identical. Power was near 500whp and torque was also close to 500 foot pounds.

Last edited by Vigo; Feb 5, 2007 at 11:05 PM.
Old Feb 5, 2007, 11:13 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you look at other dyno graphs, pay careful attention to how the torque starts to fall off. Not many GT30 setups can hold that much torque in the upper RPM range ... especially on pump gas. IMO that is why this graph may look different to you. I'd be willing to wager that the 2.3RR makes the same or more torque at 7500 RPM on pump gas than many other 2.3l GT30 setups on racegas.

l8r)
Old Feb 5, 2007, 11:33 PM
  #30  
Account Disabled
 
Vigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the idea here is to hold more torque in the upper RPM range? Is that how this new 2.3RR was designed?


Quick Reply: 60 WHP Gain with AMS VSR!!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 PM.