*NEW AMS PRODUCT* AMS 2.3RR Engine Release
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
It would seem to me that this truly is a race motor that requires C16, or some other high octane gas, or Meth if you must. Because in order to get the maximum benefit out of this motor one will need a higher octane in order to reach maximum benefits, on a bigger turbo, for which this motor was built.
Last edited by SWOLN; Aug 29, 2007 at 07:55 AM.
#34
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
Realize that greater boost easily trumps higher compression where power production is concerned. Higher compression is only beneficial to you if octane is not an issue. With 93 octane + meth injection, octane remains an issue.
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
That would not be a wise decision for your combination.
Realize that greater boost easily trumps higher compression where power production is concerned. Higher compression is only beneficial to you if octane is not an issue. With 93 octane + meth injection, octane remains an issue.
Realize that greater boost easily trumps higher compression where power production is concerned. Higher compression is only beneficial to you if octane is not an issue. With 93 octane + meth injection, octane remains an issue.
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
Okay but you still didn't answer the question, so you think it is possible then. The reason I asked is because the vehicle in question does not run on E98 all the time. The E98 rail only activates after 18psi, so to my understanding the car will be able to run low boost setting not using its alky supply.
#39
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your project is quite similar to a lean burn system designed by a few MIT guys as there senior project a few years back, onloy difference being they were direct injected.
It can be done, and depending on how much air you are running you won't need dual sets of 1600's. Get smaller injectors for the primaries and have your secondaries come on at a lower boost...it will also keep the cross over point more out of a performance level and not hinder any actual driving. It will also keep you averaged octane at a higher level and your injectors more appropriately sized.
to really find out work out your mass fuel balance and work an averaged octane level and then work out your fuel cooling you can find out rather easily...what is the latent heat of vaporization for e98 (I have e85's values) and its octane rating (motor prefferably). I ask because I know you aren't kidding. Find the heat rise through pressure increase and volume decrease...latent heat of the block and the residual exhaust gas are the hard part to get right.
Martin, if you don't mind me asking, what is so difference in dimensions between this and the regular 2.3. If it is your trade secret, then don't feel entitled to answer.
-Micah
Last edited by homemade wrx; Sep 3, 2007 at 10:16 PM.
#41
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ted from what he had told me when I met him, he planned on running dual tanks.
#43
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so, back to the RR...martin, so are you guys keeping the internal specs a secret?
Just really curious what makes this different from the regular 2.3, other than a billet crank.
Just really curious what makes this different from the regular 2.3, other than a billet crank.
#45
this thing looks badass. just seems like if you blow a motor on the track you better have some reallllly deep pockets.
maybe someday ill have the money to support that but its a bummer theres no core exchange.
is the reason for no exchange the fact that you are using a different block that is just based of the 4g63?
maybe someday ill have the money to support that but its a bummer theres no core exchange.
is the reason for no exchange the fact that you are using a different block that is just based of the 4g63?