*NEW AMS PRODUCT* AMS 2.3RR Engine Release
Jun 29, 2009 | 08:00 AM
#81
Evolving Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC
I'll leave the exact #'s out for now. Obviously the rods are longer which moves the pin up and takes weight out of the piston. If stroke is shorted, then yes the bore is bigger to make up the displacement. The actual displacement is 2260cc's so it's little smaller than the std. 100mm stroker. Well ok, I'll give one exact number out 
The rod ratio is actually higher than stock and the piston speeds come down because of two factors, stroke, and rod length. Using software, I've figured about a 160-180RPM gain just from the reduced G's because of the rod length.
The rod ratio is actually higher than stock and the piston speeds come down because of two factors, stroke, and rod length. Using software, I've figured about a 160-180RPM gain just from the reduced G's because of the rod length.
See above
If you take bit more comp height you will be over factory rod ratio. You could also use a smaller pin diameter too...21mm pin = .5mm longer rod.
Double checking numbers...
150mm is stock rod
4G64 block is 6mm taller than 4G63
CH from a stroker piston is about 6.3mm shorter IIRC
94mm crank is 6mm longer than factory
150mm + 6mm + 6.3mm - (6mm/2) = 159.3mm rod
Sometime I really wish I had been chosen for one of those AMS former FSAE engineering jobs.
Last edited by homemade wrx; Jun 29, 2009 at 09:37 AM.
Jun 29, 2009 | 09:48 AM
#83
+
+
= a 4G64 block with 87.5mm piston and 94mm crank. If using the same compression height of a 100mm stroker piston; you'd be around a 1.7:1 with a nearly 160mm rod...these are just off the top of my head and what I recall dimensions as being. I'm a subie guy without numbers in front of me, so please forgive me for tossing out some numbers I did about 2 years ago.
See above
If you take bit more comp height you will be over factory rod ratio. You could also use a smaller pin diameter too...21mm pin = .5mm longer rod.
Double checking numbers...
150mm is stock rod
4G64 block is 6mm taller than 4G63
CH from a stroker piston is about 6.3mm shorter IIRC
94mm crank is 6mm longer than factory
150mm + 6mm + 6.3mm - (6mm/2) = 159.3mm rod
Sometime I really wish I had been chosen for one of those AMS former FSAE engineering jobs.
+
= a 4G64 block with 87.5mm piston and 94mm crank. If using the same compression height of a 100mm stroker piston; you'd be around a 1.7:1 with a nearly 160mm rod...these are just off the top of my head and what I recall dimensions as being. I'm a subie guy without numbers in front of me, so please forgive me for tossing out some numbers I did about 2 years ago.
See above
If you take bit more comp height you will be over factory rod ratio. You could also use a smaller pin diameter too...21mm pin = .5mm longer rod.
Double checking numbers...
150mm is stock rod
4G64 block is 6mm taller than 4G63
CH from a stroker piston is about 6.3mm shorter IIRC
94mm crank is 6mm longer than factory
150mm + 6mm + 6.3mm - (6mm/2) = 159.3mm rod
Sometime I really wish I had been chosen for one of those AMS former FSAE engineering jobs.
Hey ! You're a good detective. I totally missed the underlined part in the AMS post. Thanks !
Jun 29, 2009 | 01:16 PM
#84
Evolving Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC
...that I know of.
But he decided he'd rather stroke it and run a short rod. It is sitting with a sleeved 4G63 2.4L now.
Last edited by homemade wrx; Jun 29, 2009 at 01:19 PM.
Jul 14, 2009 | 09:43 AM
#90
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R/TErnie
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
80
Jan 7, 2021 03:46 PM
Tray@Forged
EvoX 'For Sale' Engine Internals and Drivetrain
4
Feb 11, 2016 09:15 PM
Shaun@AWDMotorsports
Evo 'For Sale' Engine Internals and Drivetrain
206
Feb 6, 2016 06:36 PM
AWD Motorsports
AWD Motorsports - Florida
15
Aug 24, 2010 03:38 PM
AMS
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
145
Aug 2, 2007 10:07 AM
