AMS GT950R / Billet 67/65 is OUT! 830WHP Capable T3 Framed Turbo!!
Feb 18, 2009, 04:34 PM
#1
AMS GT950R / Billet 67/65 is OUT! 830WHP Capable T3 Framed Turbo!!
Recently Martin and Chris here at AMS tested a new breed of T3 based turbo. We were optimistic about the possible outcome but the end result was more than we could of imagined!
Here is a link to the original thread testing the Billet 67/62:https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...er-inside.html
More importantly here is the thread testing the AMS GT950R / Billet 67/65 Ball bearing....Making 828 whp SAE CORRECTED!!!! https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ever-ends.html
The test car in question was Martin Personal EVO VIII
Carrying the following major supporting mods:
AMS CNC Head
AMS VSR intake manifold
AMS Race FMIC
AMS built 2.0L
AMS Variation 2 Turbo Kit
This particular test was done using a .82 A/R hotside. Now this hotside is not currently available for those running an AMS kit but a smaller .63 Version is. We will have testing with this housing very soon to come
In any even here is the dyno in question:
This was at peak boost of 42 psi
The other run being compared was our first test using the smaller billet 67/62
The same Dyno in STD correction
As you can see the larger turbo had no loss in spool but made more power!
now this turbo is not going to be for everyone. It is a little more laggy than most T3 based ball bearing turbos but for those looking to build one hell of a street/strip car this is a MONSTER of a turbo. This is close to 42R power in a T3 framed turbo! The spool is quick enough that even between decently quick shifts you will remain in the heart of the power band and still be in boost!
The price for this mighty midget is $1899.95
We have these turbo's available for sale in a few options
With an AMS spec 5 bolt discharge .63 A/R housing (to bolt up to any AMS turbo Kit)
With a traditional 4 bolt discharge .82 A/R housing
With a V-band discharge .82 A/R housing
T4 housings are also available for an additional charge
Please feel free to ask any questions you might have. We have three units coming in the next 48 hours and I don't anticipate they will last long.
Eric
Here is a link to the original thread testing the Billet 67/62:https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...er-inside.html
More importantly here is the thread testing the AMS GT950R / Billet 67/65 Ball bearing....Making 828 whp SAE CORRECTED!!!! https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ever-ends.html
The test car in question was Martin Personal EVO VIII
Carrying the following major supporting mods:
AMS CNC Head
AMS VSR intake manifold
AMS Race FMIC
AMS built 2.0L
AMS Variation 2 Turbo Kit
This particular test was done using a .82 A/R hotside. Now this hotside is not currently available for those running an AMS kit but a smaller .63 Version is. We will have testing with this housing very soon to come
In any even here is the dyno in question:
This was at peak boost of 42 psi
The other run being compared was our first test using the smaller billet 67/62
The same Dyno in STD correction
As you can see the larger turbo had no loss in spool but made more power!
now this turbo is not going to be for everyone. It is a little more laggy than most T3 based ball bearing turbos but for those looking to build one hell of a street/strip car this is a MONSTER of a turbo. This is close to 42R power in a T3 framed turbo! The spool is quick enough that even between decently quick shifts you will remain in the heart of the power band and still be in boost!
The price for this mighty midget is $1899.95
We have these turbo's available for sale in a few options
With an AMS spec 5 bolt discharge .63 A/R housing (to bolt up to any AMS turbo Kit)
With a traditional 4 bolt discharge .82 A/R housing
With a V-band discharge .82 A/R housing
T4 housings are also available for an additional charge
Please feel free to ask any questions you might have. We have three units coming in the next 48 hours and I don't anticipate they will last long.
Eric
Last edited by AutoMotoSports; Feb 18, 2009 at 04:40 PM.
Feb 19, 2009, 05:29 AM
#5
Eric,
Can we see some pictures of the version 2 turbo kit? Also what would it take to convert current kits to the v2 variant, it surely has to be possible? I would imagine the wastegate is now coming off the header to allow the 4 bolt hotside to be used, so header modification is expected?
A price quote would be awesome as this looks like the direction I would like to go in the future, and I am sure I am not alone when I say this. The .82 vs .63 hotsides have always been a big topic and this will open the floodgates for more options.
Can we see some pictures of the version 2 turbo kit? Also what would it take to convert current kits to the v2 variant, it surely has to be possible? I would imagine the wastegate is now coming off the header to allow the 4 bolt hotside to be used, so header modification is expected?
A price quote would be awesome as this looks like the direction I would like to go in the future, and I am sure I am not alone when I say this. The .82 vs .63 hotsides have always been a big topic and this will open the floodgates for more options.
Feb 19, 2009, 06:56 AM
#8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nap Town Maryland
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would you guy's (AMS) suggest this turbo for street/Track usage on a 2.3L?
What would you speculate RPM to be at on a 2.3L when it starts to spool? I'm currnetly running a 35R but I defenitly want something with more umph! I'm not sure what I want to go with I was thinking the 6765 would be good but I've been told that it may be best to go with the 6262.
I have been bouncing back and forth all around about this question for about a week. I still can't made a final decision.
What would you speculate RPM to be at on a 2.3L when it starts to spool? I'm currnetly running a 35R but I defenitly want something with more umph! I'm not sure what I want to go with I was thinking the 6765 would be good but I've been told that it may be best to go with the 6262.
I have been bouncing back and forth all around about this question for about a week. I still can't made a final decision.
Feb 19, 2009, 07:18 AM
#9
Eric,
Can we see some pictures of the version 2 turbo kit? Also what would it take to convert current kits to the v2 variant, it surely has to be possible? I would imagine the wastegate is now coming off the header to allow the 4 bolt hotside to be used, so header modification is expected?
A price quote would be awesome as this looks like the direction I would like to go in the future, and I am sure I am not alone when I say this. The .82 vs .63 hotsides have always been a big topic and this will open the floodgates for more options.
Can we see some pictures of the version 2 turbo kit? Also what would it take to convert current kits to the v2 variant, it surely has to be possible? I would imagine the wastegate is now coming off the header to allow the 4 bolt hotside to be used, so header modification is expected?
A price quote would be awesome as this looks like the direction I would like to go in the future, and I am sure I am not alone when I say this. The .82 vs .63 hotsides have always been a big topic and this will open the floodgates for more options.
Would you guy's (AMS) suggest this turbo for street/Track usage on a 2.3L?
What would you speculate RPM to be at on a 2.3L when it starts to spool? I'm currnetly running a 35R but I defenitly want something with more umph! I'm not sure what I want to go with I was thinking the 6765 would be good but I've been told that it may be best to go with the 6262.
I have been bouncing back and forth all around about this question for about a week. I still can't made a final decision.
What would you speculate RPM to be at on a 2.3L when it starts to spool? I'm currnetly running a 35R but I defenitly want something with more umph! I'm not sure what I want to go with I was thinking the 6765 would be good but I've been told that it may be best to go with the 6262.
I have been bouncing back and forth all around about this question for about a week. I still can't made a final decision.
Feb 19, 2009, 07:32 AM
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nap Town Maryland
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the.63 housing how would that improve the performance on the 2.3L. Lastly how laggy are we talking? EST. RPM range. a little worse than the 37R or 42R laggy?
