*AMS PRODUCT RELEASE* Cast End Tank EVO VII-IX Front Mount Intercooler
Sep 27, 2009, 09:33 AM
#34
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: this old house
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if surface area was a key feature why did you guys make is so small then? 20 inch's long VS most at 24/25 long. Nisei comp core is 25 inch's long and still fits the crash beam. BR core's are 24 inch's long.
Sep 27, 2009, 10:41 AM
#35
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bigger isn't always better. They kept the same core because there wasn't much to improve on. I missed the part where AMS said "surface area is a key feature"
Last edited by EvODavO; Sep 27, 2009 at 12:35 PM.
Sep 27, 2009, 02:23 PM
#37
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree i dont like the looks of this cor but it has a great thing about it....that they use a true garret core and the old one didnt not....they said have extended the intercooller to fit the front bumper better like ets and even my sbr which is a monster and a awesome peice never had heat soak..
Sep 28, 2009, 01:39 PM
#42
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: this old house
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can you post some R&R or back to back testing vs other cores u say you tested so we can see the info. sell me this FMIC other then just saying it did this or that. ''not ment in a mean way''
