1/4 Times
Jan 13, 2007, 07:10 AM
#32
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where did you run this time??? If you did this recently post in here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=242735 and I'll add you to the list.
Jan 13, 2007, 07:11 AM
#33
Jan 13, 2007, 07:13 AM
#34
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for fun :
nitrous spray on intercooler, just makes it cold, and a proper intercooler( you said (BUSHUR) which is spelled wrong) would do the job without the spray, pretty much your have your nitrous for "looks" and/or "bling" factor.
21 PSI on stock evo 8 turbo
you have a HFC...
all these things show us you didnt trap that high.
cause your lieing.
Off topic... how old are you?
back to topic, if your curious how fast people go, do a search, if you did that you could have at least given us a more believable story.
nitrous spray on intercooler, just makes it cold, and a proper intercooler( you said (BUSHUR) which is spelled wrong) would do the job without the spray, pretty much your have your nitrous for "looks" and/or "bling" factor.
21 PSI on stock evo 8 turbo
you have a HFC...
all these things show us you didnt trap that high.
Off topic... how old are you?
back to topic, if your curious how fast people go, do a search, if you did that you could have at least given us a more believable story.
Jan 13, 2007, 07:36 AM
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A lot of the shops take pride in leading in one or both of the categories (ET, and MPH).
Jan 13, 2007, 08:17 AM
#36
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
ahh... ok, well AMS is coming down on the 3rd to tune us and im sure we will be at the track the next day 
... so i'll have to get with you then. My time is from Nov. or Oct. of 06
... so i'll have to get with you then. My time is from Nov. or Oct. of 06
Jan 15, 2007, 08:25 AM
#38
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Cacalac
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the ones that want my slip here you go! I also have done some weight reduction. I have taken out all the bumper reinforcements all the plastic trim, passenger and rear seats, stripped the trunk, I wanted to see what the car could do while it was stripped down! So heres the numbers and by the way, the left lane is mine and the right is my freinds Evo. So now this should be cleared up!
Last edited by jusa4cyl; Jan 15, 2007 at 08:28 AM.
Jan 15, 2007, 08:39 AM
#39
Not really. There's still no way you hit 97 in the 1/8th and 121 in the 1/4 at 21psi. You haven't told us how big of a shot you were running. Also, going from a 7.2 1/8th to an 11.79 1/4 makes absolutely no sense at those speeds unless you missed 4th a few times. Your weight reduction is also minimal. You would need to have shaved off about 700-800lbs to accomplish those speeds at 21psi. Lastly, a 9.28 1000' would be more lke an 11.1 or 11.2 run, but you have an 11.799. That would require ramming on the brakes after the 1000' mark, but then you wouldn't have a 121+ mph trap. The whole thing is very fishy.
Hmm, looking at the right lane, those times are all jacked up, too. Absolutely no way does that guy only cut a 1.8 60' but then hit a 7.55 1/8th at 90.4mph only to then trap 110 in the 1/4!! I guess he missed 4th a few times, too, along with missing 3rd, eh? Those splits are all way off on both sides.
Hmm, looking at the right lane, those times are all jacked up, too. Absolutely no way does that guy only cut a 1.8 60' but then hit a 7.55 1/8th at 90.4mph only to then trap 110 in the 1/4!! I guess he missed 4th a few times, too, along with missing 3rd, eh? Those splits are all way off on both sides.
Last edited by Warrtalon; Jan 15, 2007 at 08:42 AM.
Jan 15, 2007, 08:56 AM
#40
Yeah something is up here. Im not doubting you got the slip but the numbers on it are all wrong. You had me beat in the 1/8th by .2 sec and 5mph, then have me beat by 2mph in the 1/4 but run .1 SLOWER E.T. I was running 110 octane and 26psi on my runs, its impossible to run those times on 91 and 21psi.
Jan 15, 2007, 10:15 AM
#41
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Cacalac
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I provide proff and still.... You even think my friends time is wack. Don't know what more I can do for you guys. But I dont care if you beleive me or not! Proof is rite there! I have seen other Evo's run 11.1 @ 129... 11.6 @120.... & an 11.7 @ 122. I guess you think these times seem impossible also. I don't know what mods they have but. I know than ran those times! By the way we have 93 octane in NC and 101 octane @ our local track! I tried to keep it simple without having to waste alot of time explaining every single thing I did to make the pass. Or go into detail about all my mods and psi and shot and etc..
I was also surprised when i got my slip thats why I wanted to see what other peolpe were running with engine and tranny mods. Thats all! Lets not waste any more time on trying to make someone look like a liar.
I was also surprised when i got my slip thats why I wanted to see what other peolpe were running with engine and tranny mods. Thats all! Lets not waste any more time on trying to make someone look like a liar.
Last edited by jusa4cyl; Jan 15, 2007 at 10:20 AM.
Jan 15, 2007, 11:36 AM
#43
Ok, so you were running a hit of nitrous? Why won't you just say it and be done? You tried to say that you were just running the intercooler sprayer, but we aren't that dumb. If you had a 50-shot, then great...but admit to it. We all know you didn't run like this on 21psi without at least a 50-shot of actual nitrous injection.
What do other times of 11.1@129 and 11.6@120 have to do with you? You can't just list times like that without details and expect them to be used as proof. That 11.1@129 would be someone with a terrible 60' who spun all the way through 1st and 2nd - hell, that's a FWD type et/trap. The 11.6@120 is decent driving with a 1.7-1.8 60' and decent shifting. Your 11.8 @ 121 makes absolutely no sense when claiming 21psi AND when looking at the timeslip, because you cut a very good 1.6 60', and an incredibly nasty 7.28 1/8th mile, but then your 1/4-mile is weak. It took you longer to get down the back 1/8th than it took me, and I only trapped 113 - does that not make any sense to you?. You apparently have no experience with drag racing, because we are telling you SPECIFICS about the timeslip that are wrong, but you don't seem to understand why. You can't see that the splits are all completely wrong? How can you not see that unless you just have no idea how to read a timeslip?
So that you have a better idea, here are my best two timeslips - same mods on 93oct and 110oct. My splits are on part with the norm and what we see all the time from other Evos. Compare my splits to your buddy (and you), and you'll see that all of your times are way off:
Notice that Z06 in the right timeslip? You beat him by 7 tenths to the 1/8th mile, went faster than he did at the 1/8th AND the 1/4, yet he CAUGHT YOU by half a second in the back half. Likewise, if you look at my timeslip on the left, your buddy had a terrible launch, but smoked me to the 1/8th with only 2 extra mph (highly unlikely), yet I ran him down and ran the same time in the 1/4 despite trapping the same. In an Evo that hit 90mph in the 1/8th, he only trapped 110, which is not right. Also, on both of my timeslips, the trap speeds in the 1/4 are reading 2mph too high. I know this, because it was only the left lane by comparing all previous runs at the same track and additonal runs in the right lane by me and other Evos that day. So, I only trapped 110 on the 12.26 and 113 on the 12.000.
What do other times of 11.1@129 and 11.6@120 have to do with you? You can't just list times like that without details and expect them to be used as proof. That 11.1@129 would be someone with a terrible 60' who spun all the way through 1st and 2nd - hell, that's a FWD type et/trap. The 11.6@120 is decent driving with a 1.7-1.8 60' and decent shifting. Your 11.8 @ 121 makes absolutely no sense when claiming 21psi AND when looking at the timeslip, because you cut a very good 1.6 60', and an incredibly nasty 7.28 1/8th mile, but then your 1/4-mile is weak. It took you longer to get down the back 1/8th than it took me, and I only trapped 113 - does that not make any sense to you?. You apparently have no experience with drag racing, because we are telling you SPECIFICS about the timeslip that are wrong, but you don't seem to understand why. You can't see that the splits are all completely wrong? How can you not see that unless you just have no idea how to read a timeslip?
So that you have a better idea, here are my best two timeslips - same mods on 93oct and 110oct. My splits are on part with the norm and what we see all the time from other Evos. Compare my splits to your buddy (and you), and you'll see that all of your times are way off:
Notice that Z06 in the right timeslip? You beat him by 7 tenths to the 1/8th mile, went faster than he did at the 1/8th AND the 1/4, yet he CAUGHT YOU by half a second in the back half. Likewise, if you look at my timeslip on the left, your buddy had a terrible launch, but smoked me to the 1/8th with only 2 extra mph (highly unlikely), yet I ran him down and ran the same time in the 1/4 despite trapping the same. In an Evo that hit 90mph in the 1/8th, he only trapped 110, which is not right. Also, on both of my timeslips, the trap speeds in the 1/4 are reading 2mph too high. I know this, because it was only the left lane by comparing all previous runs at the same track and additonal runs in the right lane by me and other Evos that day. So, I only trapped 110 on the 12.26 and 113 on the 12.000.
Last edited by Warrtalon; Jan 15, 2007 at 11:41 AM.
Jan 15, 2007, 01:00 PM
#45
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Cacalac
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So your telling me the slip is wrong, some how my trap speed got screwed up. Maybe the the accelerometer the track uses is reading wrong? I don't know. All I know is I have that slip and what its telling me. So I decided to share it with you guys. Why do you think its impossible to run 11.799 when you run pretty close. 12.00 to an 11.799 thats not much difference! Even if my trap speed is off isn't still a good e.t?