Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

11.61@119mph,Stock Turbo,Pump/Alky

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #16  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Awesome time. I actually thought with that much power you'd go ever faster tho. maybe like 121 or so.
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #17  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
Originally Posted by SilverEmperor
Sorry typo, yes its the Exedy Triple Cerametallic. Boost spikes around 30psi and settles to 25-26psi, Stock rims with Nitto 555 street tires.

Car is also full-weight, including amps, amp rack, spare tire, and standard battery.

I feel the car will go 11.40's with a little faster shifting

Thanks guys
maybe with less weight you could do 11.0-11.2
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #18  
SilverEmperor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Yes, I have plans on being 650 to 700 whp sometime soon with the car....The car had a ACT street disc/hd pressure plate in it before which was slipping and locking me out of gears at high rpm. I know i could of gone with the twin disc but I have heard stories of them slipping around 600 whp....so I went with a clutch that holds 700+

Yea, with the power that the car makes i feel it will do at least a 120mph in the 1/4.
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #19  
mike1023's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 1
From: NY
do you think you picked up a lot of power from the aem vs stock ecu
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #20  
SilverEmperor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by mike1023
do you think you picked up a lot of power from the aem vs stock ecu
I first had a dynoflash without cams car put down 289whp 292lbft, then had the same mods just changed from the factory ecu to AEM (Turbo Trix Tune) and made 324 whp 328lbft, that was with a 9.8 hot side.
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:21 PM
  #21  
mike1023's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 1
From: NY
Originally Posted by SilverEmperor
I first had a dynoflash without cams car put down 289whp 292lbft, then had the same mods just changed from the factory ecu to AEM (Turbo Trix Tune) and made 324 whp 328lbft, that was with a 9.8 hot side.
well i guess the aem deff frees up a load of power lol
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #22  
AndyBandy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 27
From: Frederick, MD
People will argue that the AEM is overkill for stock turbo and whatnot, but the AEM has been a great addition for me. Sure its not fun for a daily driver because of the starting problems and some other little quircks.

but anyways, fantastic times
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #23  
kouzman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Yes but why do we see so high gains?

more detailed tune maybe?

other factors?
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #24  
hacellular's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by kouzman
Yes but why do we see so high gains?

more detailed tune maybe?

other factors?
No MAF, More air, more gas, more HP,,,, = better time plus easier to tune.
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #25  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
nice
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #26  
NIevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 4
From: Hayden, ID
Wow, those are some impressive dyno numbers and times! Lose some of that weight and see what it will do.
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #27  
Evo4u2envY's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Rez90
here's a question and i'm not criticizing.......but....

Why such an extreme clutch? you could have gotten an ACT or a Exedy twin for much less.........

Do you have plans to do a major turbo upgrade?

Just curious.........

But regardless, congrats on a great run......
John dropped .400 of a sec just from doing this clutch, and on a set of radials with some fast shifting, he should be around 11.3-11.40...i think the clutch was well worth it, and eventually he will be making Joel power...so he's def gonna need it!
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #28  
Rez90's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
From: Flemington, NJ
Originally Posted by Evo4u2envY
John dropped .400 of a sec just from doing this clutch, and on a set of radials with some fast shifting, he should be around 11.3-11.40...i think the clutch was well worth it, and eventually he will be making Joel power...so he's def gonna need it!
Oh Naggy..........
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 05:29 AM
  #29  
matt55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by kouzman
Yes but why do we see so high gains?

more detailed tune maybe?

other factors?
knock knock
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 07:55 AM
  #30  
SilverEmperor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by matt55
knock knock
My car has a fairly low timing tune, also the car has fail safes hooked up through the aem so if my SMC alky fails again...it drops timing to 0 deg and runs of wastegate pressure (11psi)...so no "knock knock" sorry


Quick Reply: 11.61@119mph,Stock Turbo,Pump/Alky



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 PM.