Same full weight Evo IX goes 121.66 mph
Apr 9, 2007, 04:25 AM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same full weight Evo IX goes 121.66 mph
Well i'm glad to say that this thursday at Carolina racetrack i made 11.53 @ 121.66 mph. The only changes i made from my setup was adding a new set of Cosworth cams for Evo IX they work perfectly. After a long datalogging and tuning and some hours inthe dyno these are the results. The cams really work in stock turbo. Like before i'm running full weight that includes spare tire and everything in the car and of course on race gas VP C-16 and 26 psi of boost. Here are the timeslip enjoy. I'm planning to go to another racetrack to see if i can low more the 60' foot time because the car can make lower times it was spining tires with 1.69' on Nitto drag radials. I will keep you on notice.
LF Ruelas
LF Ruelas
Apr 9, 2007, 06:50 AM
#4
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only thing I wish your E.T. could have went down also, you were hitting 11.5@117mph prior to the Cosworth Cams, and now your trapping 121mph and still running 11.5. Your 60's aren't bad at all, not perfect, but a 1.69 and 1.70 60fts are definitly respectable in my book. What other reasons do you believe the E.T.s were not able to get lower? Are you having to shift into fifth gear at the end?
Trending Topics
Apr 9, 2007, 09:05 AM
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only thing I wish your E.T. could have went down also, you were hitting 11.5@117mph prior to the Cosworth Cams, and now your trapping 121mph and still running 11.5. Your 60's aren't bad at all, not perfect, but a 1.69 and 1.70 60fts are definitly respectable in my book. What other reasons do you believe the E.T.s were not able to get lower? Are you having to shift into fifth gear at the end?
thanks everyone,
LF Ruelas
Apr 9, 2007, 09:08 AM
#15
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only thing I wish your E.T. could have went down also, you were hitting 11.5@117mph prior to the Cosworth Cams, and now your trapping 121mph and still running 11.5. Your 60's aren't bad at all, not perfect, but a 1.69 and 1.70 60fts are definitly respectable in my book. What other reasons do you believe the E.T.s were not able to get lower? Are you having to shift into fifth gear at the end?
thanks everyone,
LF Ruelas