recompile

iTrader: (38)

R/T 0.269
60' 1.996
330 5.516
1/8 8.502 @ 79.84
1000 11.078
1/4 13.250 @ 105.58

I was hoping to get to the 12's, but I guess not today.

cs82685

iTrader: (4)

You've definetly got the power for 12's. Trap seems low and you could definetly get the 60' down. But if you're anything like me, you're not a seasoned track veteran so you can just hope for those good 60' times

chaotichoax

iTrader: (149)

wrong forum

work on your 60' time

car should be good for much better than that

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

This is a good example of why people shouldn't worry so much about dyno numbers. Yes, the driving was very poor here, but that's not surprising for the 1st time. However, only trapping 105.xx indicates stock-like power, not 330whp. That's just 1mph faster than my 05 when it was stock and a tenth slower.

cs82685

iTrader: (4)

OT, but Warr, you may be able to expalin this to me.

IX w/exhaust, intake, bc, and tune that made 356whp. Ran a 12.7 @ 102 ??? Don't know the 60' but the guy said he didn't have a good launch. Personally from searching on here, I think the dyno it was done on reads high but it's still making more than stock power

I know the car's not making stock-like power because I've been in it and I nearly crapped my pants compared to my stock evo What would explain such a low trap? Oh and elevation is near sea level

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

Well, I don't believe for a second he trapped 102. Maybe 112? To run a 12.7@102, you have to eithre cut a 1.4 60', or you have to hit the brakes at the end before the finish line. A 12.7 totally sucks for those mods even on an VIII, so it's terrible on a IX, especially with "356whp," but if he really trapped 112mph, then that means the car isn't slow. 102 just doesn't make any sense...

cs82685

iTrader: (4)

It's on video (I filmed) Concerning the hp, he's a member here with dyno sheets in his profile also. I'm not doubting the numbers although like I said it probably is a dyno that reads high based on all the other numbers you see


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOalrHaFItI

Starts at 3:34, not the best film quality (my crappy cam) so you can't tell if he hit the brakes, but you can clearly see the 12.7 @ 102

edit: sorry for semi-hijacking

recompile

iTrader: (38)

BTW, this was 5500rpm launch and redline, lift throttle shifting.

cs82685

iTrader: (4)

Any plans to go back to get your 12 second slip?

Bonestock!

iTrader: (3)

Your trap is really low for a 330whp car. Shouldnt it be around 110-112? You werent running into a headwind or maybe a brake dragging?

project VII

iTrader: (28)

lose some weight

Ultimate CC

iTrader: (122)

yea the trap speed is real low for the power the 9 should be making...did you data log it at all?

recompile

iTrader: (38)

I did not datalog, but I have a feeling something is up with my tune.

As soon as my test pipe and K&N cone filter are on, I'm going to get a real dyno tune instead of this mail in malarky

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

The tune may not be optimum, but it's certainly not the reason your car is slow. People always want to point to the tune first instead of ensuring they have no mechanical problems like a boost leak, fouled plugs, low compression, etc.

cs82685, let me rephrase. I don't care what the timeslip or the video says...I do not believe he ran a 12.7 at only 102mph. In fact, I know he didn't. He needs to go again on a different night or to a different track and get 3-4 timeslips showing what his true trap speeds are...

Graphite_MR

iTrader: (20)

why is the peak wtq at suck high rpm on a stock turbo????? My peak wtq is at 3200 rpm .... same mos and same thing for the whp??? i hope it does not drop after 5500 rpm.,..????