No Excuses rules discussion - I have a question
#196
Wow there sure is a lot of finger pointing going on in here. I hate how people see a comment & think it implies something that it may or may not imply & then start attacking others. Then there is retalliation & the smowball effect. Alot of this could have been avoided if the original post included the reason for the post. If he had just stated that he wanted to run a lower front aero himself & wanted to know if that would be O.K. in the eyes of those regualting the record rules (or lack ther of). This would not be cheating if it was agreed upon before hand & is actually a reasonable question to raise when talking about a "no rules" record. However to answer the question at topic. I don't think it should be allowed & I see that is now the majority.
#197
Can't wait to see the feature film.
"how to cheat the lights" by Buschur Racing.
#198
Validated your point? Only if you chose to read only what you want to read. I also agreed that Brandon's car probably lifted out of the beams, did you read that part? At 1.25" of ground clearance that only gives 3/8" for the car to raise before it is out of the beams, even your 240 will lift the front end that much.
The point of the test was to see what it would do to the ET's how about a thanks for showing it can effect the times rather than your stupid *** thanks?
The point of the test was to see what it would do to the ET's how about a thanks for showing it can effect the times rather than your stupid *** thanks?
FWD cars, on the other hand, when lowered too much can mess with the timing lights and see an improvement in times. Weight is transfered and pivots downward from the front tires lowering the back of the car keeping the staging beams broken.
06MRs car did NOT lift out of the beams..... unless by some miracle the back of the car lifted up pulling the front of the car out of the pre-stage beam first and then the staged beam.
My 240sx on the other hand has NO PROBLEM lifting the front end (tires and all) over the beams.
/\ /\ /\ /\ /\ stock IRS BTW /\ /\ /\ /\ /\
#199
If someone wanted to get real sneaky they could have a flap under the front of their car powered by a solenoid or linear actuator. After the launch (so as to not raise any suspicions on the line) they hit a button and it tilts the hinged flap down so it cuts the beams at the top end 3.5 feet sooner . . .
Come to think of it, 3.5 feet at 100+ mph probably is only good for a couple hundredths. . . dang it! I was hoping it could get me into the 10's!!
Come to think of it, 3.5 feet at 100+ mph probably is only good for a couple hundredths. . . dang it! I was hoping it could get me into the 10's!!
#200
Dave, I had not read the entire thread before posting and had no clue you had made another thread. I was on page 6 of this nonsense when I posted. I did not need to go out and test things as common sense tells you exactly what will happen. I thanked you for proving exactly what I said would happen. Unless you have a car that is sitting ON the ground and launches like crap (not transferring any weight) its going to HURT your times not make them better.
FWD cars, on the other hand, when lowered too much can mess with the timing lights and see an improvement in times. Weight is transfered and pivots downward from the front tires lowering the back of the car keeping the staging beams broken.
06MRs car did NOT lift out of the beams..... unless by some miracle the back of the car lifted up pulling the front of the car out of the pre-stage beam first and then the staged beam.
My 240sx on the other hand has NO PROBLEM lifting the front end (tires and all) over the beams.
/\ /\ /\ /\ /\ stock IRS BTW /\ /\ /\ /\ /\
FWD cars, on the other hand, when lowered too much can mess with the timing lights and see an improvement in times. Weight is transfered and pivots downward from the front tires lowering the back of the car keeping the staging beams broken.
06MRs car did NOT lift out of the beams..... unless by some miracle the back of the car lifted up pulling the front of the car out of the pre-stage beam first and then the staged beam.
My 240sx on the other hand has NO PROBLEM lifting the front end (tires and all) over the beams.
/\ /\ /\ /\ /\ stock IRS BTW /\ /\ /\ /\ /\
Sick Picture
#201
If someone wanted to get real sneaky they could have a flap under the front of their car powered by a solenoid or linear actuator. After the launch (so as to not raise any suspicions on the line) they hit a button and it tilts the hinged flap down so it cuts the beams at the top end 3.5 feet sooner . . .
Come to think of it, 3.5 feet at 100+ mph probably is only good for a couple hundredths. . . dang it! I was hoping it could get me into the 10's!!
Come to think of it, 3.5 feet at 100+ mph probably is only good for a couple hundredths. . . dang it! I was hoping it could get me into the 10's!!
You just need some tires and you'll be there....
#202
If someone wanted to get real sneaky they could have a flap under the front of their car powered by a solenoid or linear actuator. After the launch (so as to not raise any suspicions on the line) they hit a button and it tilts the hinged flap down so it cuts the beams at the top end 3.5 feet sooner . . .
Come to think of it, 3.5 feet at 100+ mph probably is only good for a couple hundredths. . . dang it! I was hoping it could get me into the 10's!!
Come to think of it, 3.5 feet at 100+ mph probably is only good for a couple hundredths. . . dang it! I was hoping it could get me into the 10's!!
#203
Also, on safety and the NHRA. The rules and classes that NHRA has setup are designed to ensure your safety and the safety of the spectators. The rules also attempt to create a competitive playing field. There is a reason why certain classes are restricted to certain turbos or tire sizes, its because they don't want you going faster than the safety equipment for your class. It's not perfect but it's better than no rules at all.
David, I can certainly appreciate you not wanting a cage in your daily driver and I respect that, but I think it's equally dumb to run a 9 second chassis that doesnt have the proper safety gear. I just think of all the things that I've seen break at the track when things are pushed to the limit and then I think about my children and my family and once again the distinction is very clear. NHRA is not trying to make us slower or give us a hard time, they are just trying to protect the sport and the people that make the sport possible.
David, I can certainly appreciate you not wanting a cage in your daily driver and I respect that, but I think it's equally dumb to run a 9 second chassis that doesnt have the proper safety gear. I just think of all the things that I've seen break at the track when things are pushed to the limit and then I think about my children and my family and once again the distinction is very clear. NHRA is not trying to make us slower or give us a hard time, they are just trying to protect the sport and the people that make the sport possible.
#205
You call that lifting the wheels with IRS!
This is how it's done on my side of the world!
9 sec video-->
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/T...RAG_142106.htm
8 sec video-->
http://grs-motorsports.com/noticias/.../orlando/4.wmv
Last edited by crispeed; May 30, 2008 at 11:30 PM.
#206
Since Ivan likes to take things off topic with his jabs and pics of his RWD IRS car, i guess you have to show him what a street car that runs 8's and lifts the wheels really looks like..
#207
Cool car though. Thanks for sharing.
#208
Since yours transfers into forward motion and doesnt waste energy, i am curious what you run for a 60ft??
#209
Just admit that you don't have enough energy or traction to lift the front wheels any higher!
Last edited by crispeed; May 30, 2008 at 11:51 PM.
#210