143.3 mph, stock ecu!!!
Nov 18, 2009, 08:47 PM
#166
Doesnt matter what it reads, its a tool 
I am saying that those online calculators read like a DJ and shouldnt be trusted if you think its going to match a Mustang. So happens I have dyno'd motors back to back from an engine stand and a dynojet and its not flywheel.
The dynojet has evolved just a little in the last 25 years and isnt quite the same beast it used to be.
I am saying that those online calculators read like a DJ and shouldnt be trusted if you think its going to match a Mustang. So happens I have dyno'd motors back to back from an engine stand and a dynojet and its not flywheel.
The dynojet has evolved just a little in the last 25 years and isnt quite the same beast it used to be.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Nov 18, 2009 at 08:56 PM.
Nov 18, 2009, 08:50 PM
#167
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge Ohio
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uncorrected to uncorrected whp difference is 713whp - 640 = 73whp.
We have seen pics of the drag car trim and based on what we know the Evo is capable of getting down to, these are our estimates on weights.
More powerful cars can go slower when they are HEAVIER
STM's car estimate
TTP's street car trim
We have seen pics of the drag car trim and based on what we know the Evo is capable of getting down to, these are our estimates on weights.
More powerful cars can go slower when they are HEAVIER
STM's car estimate
TTP's street car trim
So let me get this right....
You are claiming that the TTP car with no seats, no exhaust, no wing, light wheels, and slicks STILL weighs 865 more pounds than the STM car.
Please do yourselves two favors
1. Don't insult the intelligence of the community, it makes you look bad.
2. Just admit the dyno reads a little higher than the typical Mustang and remind everyone that it doesn't matter because the dyno is merely a tool and still allows you to tune just as well as one that reads lower.
Nov 18, 2009, 08:53 PM
#168
Before and after numbers are key in my book.
The dyno is a tool for tuning. Its safer than doing pulls on the street. Allows for repeated testing and before/after events (part changes/tuning).
Some good reads:
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/03...ash/index.html
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/04...ems/index.html
The dyno is a tool for tuning. Its safer than doing pulls on the street. Allows for repeated testing and before/after events (part changes/tuning).
Some good reads:
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/03...ash/index.html
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/04...ems/index.html
Nov 18, 2009, 09:07 PM
#169
So let me get this right....
You are claiming that the TTP car with no seats, no exhaust, no wing, light wheels, and slicks STILL weighs 865 more pounds than the STM car.
Please do yourselves two favors
1. Don't insult the intelligence of the community, it makes you look bad.
2. Just admit the dyno reads a little higher than the typical Mustang and remind everyone that it doesn't matter because the dyno is merely a tool and still allows you to tune just as well as one that reads lower.
Our uncorrected MD figures are inline with most MD's.
What I have learned is that the 660whp car is 706whp using the WCF.
In the end it is a 660whp car that weighs less than a 713whp car both using uncorrected scale.
None of which is ON TOPIC because the topic is MPH which known.
Nov 19, 2009, 05:09 AM
#170
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near the hOle
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems like the WCF is like a drug, tough to get off of....
I wouldnt use it unless you dyno normally aspirated cars that need it or if the customer wants to brag. Braggers are often times scrutinized to death and in the end go much slower at the track than their #'s would indicate.
I wouldnt use it unless you dyno normally aspirated cars that need it or if the customer wants to brag. Braggers are often times scrutinized to death and in the end go much slower at the track than their #'s would indicate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TTP Engineering
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
26
Apr 2, 2010 09:31 AM
TTP Engineering
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
35
Mar 19, 2010 05:15 AM
TTP Engineering
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Mar 12, 2010 03:08 PM
TTP Engineering
EvoX 'For Sale' Services
27
Dec 1, 2009 01:11 PM
TTP Engineering
Evo X Dyno Results
45
Jun 27, 2009 03:32 PM
