143.3 mph, stock ecu!!!
#62
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think after they spend time in the drag racing section, people think its easy to go 140mph...
Paul Nelsons full drag car (tin can) when making 1000whp went what.. 163 iirc? And later with 1100+whp went 169? In a car that probably weighs 800-1000lbs less.
#63
...And what experience are you basing this off? This car is pig heavy. TTP's MD reads higher than others, but it certainly doesn't make it wrong.
I think after they spend time in the drag racing section, people think its easy to go 140mph...
Paul Nelsons full drag car (tin can) when making 1000whp went what.. 163 iirc? And later with 1100+whp went 169? In a car that probably weighs 800-1000lbs less.
I think after they spend time in the drag racing section, people think its easy to go 140mph...
Paul Nelsons full drag car (tin can) when making 1000whp went what.. 163 iirc? And later with 1100+whp went 169? In a car that probably weighs 800-1000lbs less.
He also did 166mph. I can sit here and watch video of him missing gears all day. It happens.
#64
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
...And what experience are you basing this off? This car is pig heavy. TTP's MD reads higher than others, but it certainly doesn't make it wrong.
I think after they spend time in the drag racing section, people think its easy to go 140mph...
Paul Nelsons full drag car (tin can) when making 1000whp went what.. 163 iirc? And later with 1100+whp went 169? In a car that probably weighs 800-1000lbs less.
I think after they spend time in the drag racing section, people think its easy to go 140mph...
Paul Nelsons full drag car (tin can) when making 1000whp went what.. 163 iirc? And later with 1100+whp went 169? In a car that probably weighs 800-1000lbs less.
Since we are comparing the worst of the worst compare some of the better cars like ours that ran 8.98@157 w/ 782 dynojet HP in a full interior and exhaust street car.. and with stock trans in 2 passes after being built from a shell 9.14@156.. you cant just compare the worst without looking at better built and driven cars..
#65
Mike, do you ever stop patting yourself on the back?
Good job TTP on the stock ECU. Nice job building your own motor and head as well. That is what I would consider "modifying the 4G63".
Good job TTP on the stock ECU. Nice job building your own motor and head as well. That is what I would consider "modifying the 4G63".
#70
With that said, it really does make these stock ECU big power cars impressive.
#73
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Buren, OH
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
according to the Jcalculator on my car:
HP: 708
Weight: 2950 with me in it
1/4: 9.373
MPH: 145.4
Seems like its on crack to me. Real times are 9.4 with barely a 4th gear, so that should be 9.0 atleast. And 159 mph slow shifting.
That jcalculator doesnt even seem close to me.
HP: 708
Weight: 2950 with me in it
1/4: 9.373
MPH: 145.4
Seems like its on crack to me. Real times are 9.4 with barely a 4th gear, so that should be 9.0 atleast. And 159 mph slow shifting.
That jcalculator doesnt even seem close to me.
#74
according to the Jcalculator on my car:
HP: 708
Weight: 2950 with me in it
1/4: 9.373
MPH: 145.4
Seems like its on crack to me. Real times are 9.4 with barely a 4th gear, so that should be 9.0 atleast. And 159 mph slow shifting.
That jcalculator doesnt even seem close to me.
HP: 708
Weight: 2950 with me in it
1/4: 9.373
MPH: 145.4
Seems like its on crack to me. Real times are 9.4 with barely a 4th gear, so that should be 9.0 atleast. And 159 mph slow shifting.
That jcalculator doesnt even seem close to me.
When you dyno your car on a correctly reading dyno, come back here and make your own thread about it.