Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

Wheels & tires weight/size and the effects of performance in 1/4th of mile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2009, 01:27 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
juanmedina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: greenville, sc
Posts: 426
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheels & tires weight/size and the effects of performance in 1/4th of mile

Car Weight 2815 lbs + 150 lb driver = 2965lbs
1/4th 12.14sec@115.54mph
1/8th 7.845sec@91.15mph
60' 1.845

I run those time with some heavy wheels 18x9.5
Wheel weight: 21.2 lbs
Tire weight: 25 lbs
Tire size: 245/40/18

I am thinking on switching to 17x7 wheels
Wheel weight: 14.4 lbs
Tire weight: 18 lbs
Tire size: 215/45/17

Total savings of weight about 58-60 lbs.

I want to know how much quicker and faster my car will be by switching the wheels on the 1/4th? Assuming the same conditions...

Thanks

Last edited by juanmedina; Dec 11, 2009 at 09:26 AM.
Old Dec 10, 2009, 02:12 PM
  #2  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (149)
 
chaotichoax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,108
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
the rule of thumb is 100 = 1/10 of a second

however, I'm not sure what the calculations are for rotational mass...I'm sure it will be a few 1/10's at the least
Old Dec 10, 2009, 04:28 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
juanmedina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: greenville, sc
Posts: 426
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chaotichoax
the rule of thumb is 100 = 1/10 of a second

however, I'm not sure what the calculations are for rotational mass...I'm sure it will be a few 1/10's at the least
There is too much math involve and I am not smart enough to figure it out

All I know is that I am saving 60 lbs of unsprung weight

1 lb of unsprung weight = 4 lbs of sprung weight

60x4 = 240 lbs

So thats again of about .24 tenths

I should gain something from the size also; so I think a total drop of .3-.4 tenths is possible. Which is amazing to me how about my trap speed?

What do you guys think?


I post somewhere else and this is what one guys came out with

You have several factors going on by changing tires and wheels, but saving weight is always a good one.

1rst factor: Weight is directly related (inversely) to acceleration
Force = mass x acceleration
Your total weight = 2915
If you cut weight by 60 lbs that is (2915 - 60) / 2915 * 100 = 97.9% of your original weight

100 - 97.7 = 2.1% decrease in weight which directly relates to a increase of 2.1% in acceleration
This part alone should increase either end velocity by 2% (= 117.8 mph in 1/4mile) or decrease time by 2% (= 11.90s in 1/4 mile). One negative factor to increased speed is increased air resistance, so not all of that 2% can be applied.

factor 2:
Kinetic energy of flywheel = 1/2 mass[mass at a given radius] * Velocity squared

Your tire is in effect a spinning flywheel. It takes energy to spin a flywheel up to speed. By cutting down on tire weight (especially perimeter weight) you decrease the energy needed to spin the tire to the same RPM as a higher weight tire. This energy is quite significant, maybe even more than the loss of mass that increases acceleration directly, from factor 1. If you want tires for racing only, use the lightest tires possible and smallest radius.

factor 3:

You didn't give the actual outside perimeter of your tire dimensions. A smaller tire in diameter also amounts to less travel per revolution of tire. A tire 2 feet in diameter at crown amounts to perimeter of 6.28 feet of travel per revolution. A tire that is 1 foot 10 inches in diameter = 5.76 feet of travel per revolution.
So the smaller the tire diameter the more easily it is accelerated (giving in essence more starting torque or a lower gear ratio) bu the actual travel is smaller than the larger radius. The only way to make up for this is more rpm's.
For example , using tire above, a 2 foot tire turning at 2000 rpm = 12,560 feet per minute or 209 feet per second of travel.
A 1 foot 10 inch tire at 2000 rpm = 192 feet per second

If you use the smaller tire, you have to increase the rpm by this much:
2,000 rpm/ 192 ft/s = X rpm/ 209
x = 2,177 rpm
So to go the same distance in the same amount of time you have to run your motor 177 rpm faster. The good thing though, is it is easier for your engine to go faster, because a smaller radius tire also is a lower gear ratio effect to your engine so the load is much lower and torque and horsepower develop faster.

To sum it up...with the lower flywheel effect and less weight you could easily shave up to a 0.5seconds from your 1/4 mile time and add maybe 3 mph to your top end.
Old Dec 10, 2009, 05:00 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
SOEuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Афганистан
Posts: 1,399
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
screw the math...hit the track and post up results,im in the process of cutting weight down there as well

and BTW,your 215 sounds a lil skinny,you might loose some time in the 60ft
Old Dec 10, 2009, 07:05 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by juanmedina
There is too much math involve and I am not smart enough to figure it out

All I know is that I am saving 60 lbs of unsprung weight

1 lb of unsprung weight = 4 lbs of sprung weight

60x4 = 240 lbs

So thats again of about .24 tenths

I should gain something from the size also; so I think a total drop of .3-.4 tenths is possible. Which is amazing to me how about my trap speed?

What do you guys think?


I post somewhere else and this is what one guys came out with
I've always heard it as 1lb of rotating weight = 2lbs of dead weight. In which case would be about a tenth you would gain, along with about a 1mph. Going down to a tire that is 30mm skinnier might take away from your 60ft as well.
Old Dec 22, 2009, 03:57 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
TakaseEVOIXSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: houston
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also... think about he HEIGHT of the tires. Obviously that will play a role in your gear ratios which will have a huge impact on your trapspeed.
Old May 28, 2011, 06:39 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
rodhot6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there are many issues here, lower gear ratio-less weight are great, is the contact patch the same, traction is key, then theres the effect on the ecu, car speedo says you are going faster so the tuning map comes in differently, the track or a dyno will tell, the lighter wheels and tires will help handling and braking, todays trend of huge wheels is only bling, usually compromizing performance and costing much more, not to mention the ride qulity of a 35 series rubber band and the chance for damage with little cushion for bad roads
Old May 28, 2011, 07:42 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
mrboost05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: maryland/west chester pa
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I am just wondering what weight mods you have done to reach your 2815 weight i kno there is a big thread that lists the weight of parts i was just wondering what you had done ?
Old May 28, 2011, 01:22 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
GotWheelHop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rodhot6
then theres the effect on the ecu, car speedo says you are going faster so the tuning map comes in differently
Sorry to go off topic, but you couldn't be any more wrong. The ECU determines fueling/timing based off engine RPM, not wheel speed.
Old May 28, 2011, 07:49 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
awddyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These calculation only work if you are very concistent with your runs. A better 60' would make more of a difference at this point. I've seen 1.7 60' out of 18" wheels. I don't doubt it's possible to cut a 1.6 with proper set up.
Answer is yes it will help. With a 115 trap, I'd say you have more in it just the way it is.
Old May 29, 2011, 09:56 AM
  #11  
Newbie
 
rodhot6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks, i thought wheel speed figured into the ecu mapping, i am surely going with smaller tires on my doggy 4 cyl colorado truck, how i wish the turbo 4 cyl was available in this small truck
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EvoDan2004
Evo Electrical / Audio / Security
1954
Oct 21, 2019 04:23 PM
Noize
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
29
Sep 27, 2016 05:18 PM
Terror Rising
Motor Sports
15
Dec 6, 2015 07:10 PM
fabcas311
Drag Racing
18
Jun 27, 2011 02:57 PM
Martin@AMS
Evo X General
19
Jun 22, 2010 11:47 AM



Quick Reply: Wheels & tires weight/size and the effects of performance in 1/4th of mile



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 AM.