2.0 vs 2.2 for Drag race
#31
Mike,
here is one of the links:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...6-152-e85.html
Again,
I am not saying that the 2.3RR is the goal for a drag engine. I am just saying that I like the well roundedness of this motor. the benefits of the stroker with high revs...
I still think and as its shown, the 2.1 / 2.2 is a great motor.
There will always be motors that will go fast, 2.4's are makin sick power but a semi reliable drag motor the 2.1 and 2.2 remain the top from what I can see and follow on here.
here is one of the links:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...6-152-e85.html
Again,
I am not saying that the 2.3RR is the goal for a drag engine. I am just saying that I like the well roundedness of this motor. the benefits of the stroker with high revs...
I still think and as its shown, the 2.1 / 2.2 is a great motor.
There will always be motors that will go fast, 2.4's are makin sick power but a semi reliable drag motor the 2.1 and 2.2 remain the top from what I can see and follow on here.
#32
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I took several years of physics... trust me on this one. Horsepower is work over time. There's a reason why Diesel trucks don't outrun Honda's. IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF THE TORQUE TO WEIGHT RATIO.
bah... read this.
http://www.jacobmcdonald.com/weblinks/hptq2.html
Credit goes to Paul Yaw. You might remember him from developing such products as the Injector Dynamics 1000cc and 2000cc injectors that you all know and love.
BTW... I chose the 2.2L
bah... read this.
http://www.jacobmcdonald.com/weblinks/hptq2.html
Credit goes to Paul Yaw. You might remember him from developing such products as the Injector Dynamics 1000cc and 2000cc injectors that you all know and love.
BTW... I chose the 2.2L
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
If you rev that motor to 9K the life span isn't that long. That is what I heard. I have a 2.4 and when they tuned it I asked why did they set my rev limiter to 7800 rpm. They told me so the motor will have a long life span. But I have also been told that they can rev high. I would like to know how long the 2.4 will last at high revving points? Has any one document this?
#37
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fastest Evo to Date, David Stock-DS9 , 20/03/2010 , STM , Evo 9 , Tomei 2.2L stroker , Garrett GT45 , Motec M400 Tuned by Andre Simon , 5.431 / 8.349 / 169.72mph.
You can build any engine to go high rpm if you know what your doing. David Buschur has that new Hi RPM 2.3L Motor that seems to do quite well aswell.
You can build any engine to go high rpm if you know what your doing. David Buschur has that new Hi RPM 2.3L Motor that seems to do quite well aswell.
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
For a given valve area your stroke will dictate where your powerband happens. If you can engineer the engine to make torque @ the highest RPM possible, you'll make the most horsepower. The 2.1L 4G64 is probably the best highly available stroke/block combination. You could destroke it past a 2.1L, but at that point you'd be doing what Spyros is doing... creating valvetrain that will rev past 12k RPMs.
Transmission are rated in torque, by reducing the torque output of the engine by making more horsepower at a higher RPM, it makes the job of the gear box much easier. I think for most of us... this is the money saver.
Transmission are rated in torque, by reducing the torque output of the engine by making more horsepower at a higher RPM, it makes the job of the gear box much easier. I think for most of us... this is the money saver.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fromWRXtoEVO
09+ Ralliart Brakes/Wheels/Suspension
26
Jul 29, 2015 04:36 AM