SST and auto-x (Ralliart, X MR...)
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
SST and auto-x (Ralliart, X MR...)
Spun off this thread from something else... a pre-emptive strike to avoid being slapped by the moderators, hehe...
----------------
How comfortable are you with downshifting the SST into 1st for auto-x? When slowing down to say 30km/h for a tight one, I have three options...
And (3) really trusts the SST to never get itself in a muddle. Grenading a manual trans with a sloppy 2nd-to-1st is inconvenient and embarrassing. Grenading an SST would be a sob story of epic proportions...
I've stuck with (1) so far... just getting on-throttle way earlier than I used to in my old n/a car, timing it so the torque curve gets up and boogies at the right point in the tight exit...
Rich
----------------
- Boring 2nd gear style, one pedal at a time.
- 2nd gear, left-foot-braking to keep spool up.
- 1st gear downshift.
And (3) really trusts the SST to never get itself in a muddle. Grenading a manual trans with a sloppy 2nd-to-1st is inconvenient and embarrassing. Grenading an SST would be a sob story of epic proportions...
I've stuck with (1) so far... just getting on-throttle way earlier than I used to in my old n/a car, timing it so the torque curve gets up and boogies at the right point in the tight exit...
Rich
#3
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you guys have any course maps to be specific?
Not to be an ***, but I've never come across a corner so tight that I would run into this situation. only time I use 1st is launching off the start line
Not to be an ***, but I've never come across a corner so tight that I would run into this situation. only time I use 1st is launching off the start line
#4
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Wow, this certainly took some dredging of old HDD areas...
I'll admit, I found what was probably the most extreme example! But I didn't want this to turn into a discussion on lines, lol.
In truth, with the above course, you'd be going so slowly at that 180* turn that a flick into 1st wouldn't be all that mechanically unsympathetic. For sake of argument, here's a more borderline case...
With a low-powered vehicle, the 180* above was fine to take nice and wide. With the RA, I'd be keen to attack that with a sharper rotation at a lower minimum speed - more point-and-squirt. 2nd to 1st downshift would be the go - at least to compare back-to-back times between that and staying in 2nd all way round.
Rich
I'll admit, I found what was probably the most extreme example! But I didn't want this to turn into a discussion on lines, lol.
In truth, with the above course, you'd be going so slowly at that 180* turn that a flick into 1st wouldn't be all that mechanically unsympathetic. For sake of argument, here's a more borderline case...
With a low-powered vehicle, the 180* above was fine to take nice and wide. With the RA, I'd be keen to attack that with a sharper rotation at a lower minimum speed - more point-and-squirt. 2nd to 1st downshift would be the go - at least to compare back-to-back times between that and staying in 2nd all way round.
Rich
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, this certainly took some dredging of old HDD areas...
I'll admit, I found what was probably the most extreme example! But I didn't want this to turn into a discussion on lines, lol.
In truth, with the above course, you'd be going so slowly at that 180* turn that a flick into 1st wouldn't be all that mechanically unsympathetic. For sake of argument, here's a more borderline case...
With a low-powered vehicle, the 180* above was fine to take nice and wide. With the RA, I'd be keen to attack that with a sharper rotation at a lower minimum speed - more point-and-squirt. 2nd to 1st downshift would be the go - at least to compare back-to-back times between that and staying in 2nd all way round.
Rich
I'll admit, I found what was probably the most extreme example! But I didn't want this to turn into a discussion on lines, lol.
In truth, with the above course, you'd be going so slowly at that 180* turn that a flick into 1st wouldn't be all that mechanically unsympathetic. For sake of argument, here's a more borderline case...
With a low-powered vehicle, the 180* above was fine to take nice and wide. With the RA, I'd be keen to attack that with a sharper rotation at a lower minimum speed - more point-and-squirt. 2nd to 1st downshift would be the go - at least to compare back-to-back times between that and staying in 2nd all way round.
Rich
http://www.houscca.com/solo/courses/nov11.jpg
I've never come across an extreme 180 like above, guess my officials just don't think that's smart course design. Hell to be honest I don't like those course designs at all
anyway, for that 180 in the first layout, I would ignore their arrows and take it like a normal wide sweeper. Unless they have stupid rules in your area, the whole track is open to use, you just have to obey cones. The benefits of Mitsu's AWD/AWC are being able to apply more power mid turn, and apply it earlier
I would definitely take that in 2nd, just using a wider line. Taking a direct 180 would drop you too far down the rpm range - can't think of any car that would take that faster as a tight 180 honestly
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vaqusis
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
56
Sep 29, 2017 08:35 AM