Dyno #, 302 whp, 294 ft-lbs Tq
Dec 8, 2005, 06:01 PM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florence, AZ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mustang Dyno #'s, 302 whp, 294 ft-lbs Tq
Here it is guys and girls. Comments welcome.
This is on 91oct out here in AZ. Check my mods in my sig.
This is on 91oct out here in AZ. Check my mods in my sig.
Last edited by V8EaterEvo; Dec 8, 2005 at 07:58 PM.
Dec 8, 2005, 06:25 PM
#4
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems about just what I would xpect with your mods on a mustang dyno with pump gas
This would equal about 330 on a dyno jet type dyno which is strong considering the fuel you have out there
I think with a MBC you could hold the boost better on the top end - however it looks like a smooth curve
You know its very interesting on the a/f chart as I am looking at your data log now and its the same identical curve on my a/f print out only mine is 1/2 point richer on the road
This would equal about 330 on a dyno jet type dyno which is strong considering the fuel you have out there
I think with a MBC you could hold the boost better on the top end - however it looks like a smooth curve
You know its very interesting on the a/f chart as I am looking at your data log now and its the same identical curve on my a/f print out only mine is 1/2 point richer on the road
Last edited by DynoFlash; Dec 8, 2005 at 06:30 PM.
Dec 8, 2005, 06:30 PM
#6
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florence, AZ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
It seems about just what I would xpect with your mods on a mustang dyno with pump gas
This would equal about 330 on a dyno jet type dyno which is strong considering the fuel you have out there
I think with a MBC you could hold the boost better on the top end - however it looks like a smooth curve
This would equal about 330 on a dyno jet type dyno which is strong considering the fuel you have out there
I think with a MBC you could hold the boost better on the top end - however it looks like a smooth curve
Dec 8, 2005, 06:31 PM
#7
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by V8EaterEvo
I'm going to get a better Cat-Back, probably Bushur's. Seems to be a good one after reading his post on how company's sell bad products.
Trending Topics
Dec 8, 2005, 06:37 PM
#9
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florence, AZ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
remeinding me of the tiny hole in your rear muffler then I think the power is excelent as a full 3" exhuats would prob net you another 10 whp at leats
Dec 8, 2005, 06:54 PM
#11
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florence, AZ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
The intake is fine
better octane and a better exhuast is the problems
better octane and a better exhuast is the problems
Dec 8, 2005, 07:04 PM
#13
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florence, AZ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
No, don't run octane booster man. Either use alky or race gas.
If I run 26 psi with the Alky kit and better cat-back, I'll be well over 350 whp. What do you think?
Forever
Dec 8, 2005, 07:28 PM
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try to avoid octane boosters, they have organometallics like MMT, not good for O2 sensors
Originally Posted by V8EaterEvo
Cool, those can be fixed. I'm going to start running octane booter from now on. Will this effect the tune at all?