Dyno proof HKS RS Intake vs. K & N drop in - 11 whp difference
#1
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Dyno proof HKS RS Intake vs. K & N drop in - 11 whp difference
Here is some very interesting data
Here is a customer who came in with 3" exhuast, walboro pump, boost controller and he had the HKS RS suction kit on May 7
he made 303 whp and 309 ft lbs - I thought it was a very nice result with a few mods his car was running very smooth and strong
Apparently the customer could NOT stand the sound of the stock bov which was much louder through the HKS RS kit so he came back with his stock intake and K & N drop in filter 11 days later with the same exact mods expect the HKS RS intake
You can see that the car lost like 11 whp and 4 ft lbs of trq
It seems the power is equal down low and the top end is where the HKS unit starts to shine !
I would imagine that all the inatkes with suction pipes would yeild the same results e.g. the Buschur
Here is a customer who came in with 3" exhuast, walboro pump, boost controller and he had the HKS RS suction kit on May 7
he made 303 whp and 309 ft lbs - I thought it was a very nice result with a few mods his car was running very smooth and strong
Apparently the customer could NOT stand the sound of the stock bov which was much louder through the HKS RS kit so he came back with his stock intake and K & N drop in filter 11 days later with the same exact mods expect the HKS RS intake
You can see that the car lost like 11 whp and 4 ft lbs of trq
It seems the power is equal down low and the top end is where the HKS unit starts to shine !
I would imagine that all the inatkes with suction pipes would yeild the same results e.g. the Buschur
#6
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by nastea
hehe, i'm glad i have this intake also
W esee huge gains from the HKS RS kit and also from the Buschur intake combined with suction tube
Also to a lesser extent the cusco intake tube is very good
THE APS intake is seriously powerful - but requires a full custom tune b/c of the way it significantly effects the air flow signal
#7
how much more significant is the buschur intake hard pipe as oppose to just the buschur filter? I'm wondering if I should shell out that extra 200 bucks. need info asap because I'm sending my ecu out next week!
Trending Topics
#9
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by BushBurninEvo
how much more significant is the buschur intake hard pipe as oppose to just the buschur filter? I'm wondering if I should shell out that extra 200 bucks. need info asap because I'm sending my ecu out next week!
Keep in mind when you add the cams - we see some idle difficulties starting b/c the air velocity is not as fast in low rpm situations
With that said on the top end getting rid of that nasty rubber restrictive hose between the air box and turbo really frees up the air flow
Basically - I can say this - IF Buschur makes it - it makes you good whp gains
#10
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Deca Auto
how bout aem? everyone says it sucks but isn't it the same design?
For unknown reasons they consistantly produce lower whp on the dyno
Although its a well made unit and it reads the maf signal very consistantly - - it does seem to lack the gains I see with the Buschur and HKS units
WHY - I can't tell you but I am seeing a trend in DOZENS of the cars with AEM intakes
#11
How about the K&N Typhoon?
I'm sure the HKS is the best..but it's filtration with the foam filter is terrible even when new...probably part of the reason it has the best gains...very little air restriction
Haven't you also seen some of the best overall results on a moderately modified Evo with the K&N drop-in?
I'm sure the HKS is the best..but it's filtration with the foam filter is terrible even when new...probably part of the reason it has the best gains...very little air restriction
Haven't you also seen some of the best overall results on a moderately modified Evo with the K&N drop-in?
#13
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Its a significant gain
Keep in mind when you add the cams - we see some idle difficulties starting b/c the air velocity is not as fast in low rpm situations
With that said on the top end getting rid of that nasty rubber restrictive hose between the air box and turbo really frees up the air flow
Basically - I can say this - IF Buschur makes it - it makes you good whp gains
Keep in mind when you add the cams - we see some idle difficulties starting b/c the air velocity is not as fast in low rpm situations
With that said on the top end getting rid of that nasty rubber restrictive hose between the air box and turbo really frees up the air flow
Basically - I can say this - IF Buschur makes it - it makes you good whp gains