AL Goes 10.59 with AMS Turbo Kit
#16
Evolving Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
I just got a call from AL about 5 minutes ago and on his FIRST pass with the new setup he went 10.59@137.3 MPH. His Evo went 6.93@103.4 in the 8th. Congrats AL I am glad we finally got you into our kit as we suspected you did great things with it. I am sure he will be calling later on today with a better time He wanted me to post this up celebrating his times and how much he loves the AMS GT35R Turbo kit. WAY TO GO AL!
Eric
Eric
#17
Congrats AL.
And yes, just cause he is running the AMS now doesnt mean that his past praise is null and void................ya know what he never ran a BR kit on his car ever.
The thing that sticks out most on my mind is his reccomendation of the BR kits (specifically the br440 if your gonna run pump gas) being perfect for those as far as price per horsepower, after finishing off stages I-IV. Just cause he ran a HKS and now an AMS.......does not detract from that one bit.
Great times AL !
And yes, just cause he is running the AMS now doesnt mean that his past praise is null and void................ya know what he never ran a BR kit on his car ever.
The thing that sticks out most on my mind is his reccomendation of the BR kits (specifically the br440 if your gonna run pump gas) being perfect for those as far as price per horsepower, after finishing off stages I-IV. Just cause he ran a HKS and now an AMS.......does not detract from that one bit.
Great times AL !
#18
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by twan
Congrats AL.
And yes, just cause he is running the AMS now doesnt mean that his past praise is null and void................ya know what he never ran a BR kit on his car ever.
The thing that sticks out most on my mind is his reccomendation of the BR kits (specifically the br440 if your gonna run pump gas) being perfect for those as far as price per horsepower, after finishing off stages I-IV. Just cause he ran a HKS and now an AMS.......does not detract from that one bit.
Great times AL !
And yes, just cause he is running the AMS now doesnt mean that his past praise is null and void................ya know what he never ran a BR kit on his car ever.
The thing that sticks out most on my mind is his reccomendation of the BR kits (specifically the br440 if your gonna run pump gas) being perfect for those as far as price per horsepower, after finishing off stages I-IV. Just cause he ran a HKS and now an AMS.......does not detract from that one bit.
Great times AL !
The reason why I recomend the BR 440 kit is becuase with a stock bottom end and pump gas we never tune cars over 430 whp becuase the stock bottom end can not reliably hold more power than that
Sure - the AMS kit - at almost TWICE the price of the Buschur kit CAN make more than 440 whp - BUT when we tuned the AMS kit on a stock EVO with a Dyno Flash we made only 444 whp on race fuel and did not DARE raise the boost higher - so the xtra capacity of the AMS kit was wasted
NOW - the kicker - the Buschur kit spools up at the SAME point as stock - and the AMS kit spools up at least 1,000 rpms later
Obviously the AMS kit can be ordered with smaller turbos - but we have not tested those set ups
The reason wy I recomend the Buschur kit is becuase its a great value for the money and it works really well
As for the BR 500 we made over 500 whp with it on a reflash - which was amazing
Also - I have been told by Dave Buschur that he is now offering the SAME GT 35 R series ball bearing turbos as in the AMS kits on his cast manifold kit - - again have not tested those yet either
The bottom line in turbo selection is to selct the proprly size turbo for your use and engine set up
Getting too big a turbo is going to make a laggy and unpleasant car to drive - while to small a turbo is - well - like stock
The AMS and Buschur kits are BOTH great units and the decision on which one to get depends on your budget and your intended application
Just as some people will use HKS 264 cams and others want JUN 272 - - it depends on how you plan to use the car
#19
Evolved Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there any data saying that stock bottom end cant hold 450whp? I mean, it's not like we road race our personal evo, so it doesnt hit 450whp day in and day out, 24 hours a day. Just like 19psi of boost, I dont hit that boost level everytime I drive. Most of the time, I wont be on boost at all. Well, maybe 4-5 psi. And doesnt the sparco evo still have stock bottom end? Plus, the br440 is almost like the stock turbo. I think it's too small for many of us. Just my .02 cents.
#20
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Penn State University
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Al, what did you break in eliminations?
Masterevo, this thread is about Al's results with the AMS turbokit, not how much you can reliably hold on the stock bottom end, which has been covered in at least a dozen threads. And some of us do road-race our personal Evo's.
Masterevo, this thread is about Al's results with the AMS turbokit, not how much you can reliably hold on the stock bottom end, which has been covered in at least a dozen threads. And some of us do road-race our personal Evo's.
#21
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by masterevo
Is there any data saying that stock bottom end cant hold 450whp? I mean, it's not like we road race our personal evo, so it doesnt hit 450whp day in and day out, 24 hours a day. Just like 19psi of boost, I dont hit that boost level everytime I drive. Most of the time, I wont be on boost at all. Well, maybe 4-5 psi. And doesnt the sparco evo still have stock bottom end? Plus, the br440 is almost like the stock turbo. I think it's too small for many of us. Just my .02 cents.
These are just our recomendations for prudent limitations
#22
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by metaphysical
Al, what did you break in eliminations?
Masterevo, this thread is about Al's results with the AMS turbokit, not how much you can reliably hold on the stock bottom end, which has been covered in at least a dozen threads. And some of us do road-race our personal Evo's.
Masterevo, this thread is about Al's results with the AMS turbokit, not how much you can reliably hold on the stock bottom end, which has been covered in at least a dozen threads. And some of us do road-race our personal Evo's.
#24
Also - I have been told by Dave Buschur that he is now offering the SAME GT 35 R series ball bearing turbos as in the AMS kits on his cast manifold kit - - again have not tested those yet either
Eric
#26
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matt55
Could you tell us more about how the AMS35 spools and acts on the street ?
BTW Kick *** times
BTW Kick *** times
On more stock like vehicles it may be too laggy
On my car I am now working to slow down the spool up as it hits too hard
#27
Evolved Member
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
On my car I am now working to slow down the spool up as it hits too hard
Congrats Bro !!!
Isn't there someone out there that makes CF halfshafts ??? You would think you could find somebody to do it.
Of course, once you make them bulletproof, it's on to the next weakest link ....