Please post your E85 stock turbo IDC%
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Stock 9.8 VIII turbo with 1000cc and one Walbro 255
Log 1:
7000 rpm
21.3 psi
10.9 AFR (gas configured wideband)
87% IDC
Log2:
7125 rpm
20.1 psi
11.2 AFR (gas configured wideband)
82% IDC
I don't see how the max PSI matters when it comes to IDC's, but since you asked it was 27psi in log 1 and 26psi in log 2. Logged with JDM MAP.
Log 1:
7000 rpm
21.3 psi
10.9 AFR (gas configured wideband)
87% IDC
Log2:
7125 rpm
20.1 psi
11.2 AFR (gas configured wideband)
82% IDC
I don't see how the max PSI matters when it comes to IDC's, but since you asked it was 27psi in log 1 and 26psi in log 2. Logged with JDM MAP.
Last edited by mplspilot; Jun 9, 2008 at 06:56 PM.
#17
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
First tank of E85. Probably more like E75. No tuning except to dial in the injector scaling. Running FIC 1050s scaled at 696 cc/min. I'm finding that FIC 1050s are pretty much exactly 2x the flow capacity of stock injectors.
7000 rpm
20.0 psi
11.0 afr (gas configured)
70% IDC
With more tuning, I suppose I'll hit about 80% IDC.
Pump gas values are:
7000 rpm
20.0 psi
11.0 afr
47% IDC
7000 rpm
20.0 psi
11.0 afr (gas configured)
70% IDC
With more tuning, I suppose I'll hit about 80% IDC.
Pump gas values are:
7000 rpm
20.0 psi
11.0 afr
47% IDC
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
I think another big factor is fuel rail, fuel lines and fuel pumps being used. By simply switching from a inline walbro 392 to a bosch 044 my A/F ratio went from 12.5:1 to 11.5:1 and my duty cycles dropped from 98% to 94%. So it runs richer and runs less duty cycle. Now that I have it dialed in at 11.7-11.8ish I am down to 92% duty cycle.
#19
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
I think another big factor is fuel rail, fuel lines and fuel pumps being used. By simply switching from a inline walbro 392 to a bosch 044 my A/F ratio went from 12.5:1 to 11.5:1 and my duty cycles dropped from 98% to 94%. So it runs richer and runs less duty cycle. Now that I have it dialed in at 11.7-11.8ish I am down to 92% duty cycle.
#20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
The base fuel pressure stayed the exact same at 50psi. I checked it and didn't touch the regulator.
On the top I believe it is simply keeping up now, where the walbro was not keeping the 1:1 ratio as boost got really high. The 392 is nowhere near as good as the bosch in the 80-90psi range.
On the top I believe it is simply keeping up now, where the walbro was not keeping the 1:1 ratio as boost got really high. The 392 is nowhere near as good as the bosch in the 80-90psi range.
#21
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
The base fuel pressure stayed the exact same at 50psi. I checked it and didn't touch the regulator.
On the top I believe it is simply keeping up now, where the walbro was not keeping the 1:1 ratio as boost got really high. The 392 is nowhere near as good as the bosch in the 80-90psi range.
On the top I believe it is simply keeping up now, where the walbro was not keeping the 1:1 ratio as boost got really high. The 392 is nowhere near as good as the bosch in the 80-90psi range.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hollywood_X
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
88
Aug 31, 2014 10:42 AM