Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

AFRs for a tracked car and E85?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2010, 12:34 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
bchappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: VEGAS
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AFRs for a tracked car and E85?

Well I was thinking in the 11.5 range...
however I have been running 12 throughout and anytime I try to add fuel I get sporadic counts of knock.
Timing is pretty conservative I think 4@ peak and tapering to 18?
What do ya guys think?
Old May 14, 2010, 01:02 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Jim in Tucson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think 12:1 AFR should be good for street and/or track.

I don't track my car, so take my advice very lightly.

I suggest staying with the same AFR on street and track. And 12:1 sounds good.
For the track, I'd run less boost. Not because of E85 or anything related, but simply because you are staying in boost for much longer periods of time and at an increased frequency. I'm assuming stock, or stock frame turbo.

If your street tune is right at MBT, and if you wanted to be even more cautious, you could have a special track timing map with some additional margin.

Will most tracks let you have your laptop along? If so, simple data log just like you would on the street. Let your car tell you what it wants, or what it needs to give up.

Old May 14, 2010, 01:08 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have mine set to 11.7-11.9 for track use and that has worked pretty well. I wouldn't go any leaner than that for a track day or autocross. I personally haven't seen significant power gains above those figures anyway....

My timing values are pretty similar, although I'm running a bit more up top and a little lower at peak load...not much though, a degree or two lower and 2-3 degrees higher up top.

Hope that helps.
Old May 14, 2010, 01:11 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
bchappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: VEGAS
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ya with the 8 you can run a bit more timing. I just go a little richer and the car gets little 1-2 counts, which I dont like, I would rather have no knock like I have at 12.0. Ill have to play around a little on tomorrow and see whats going on.
Old May 14, 2010, 09:14 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
didn't notice you're running an 8...timing is cool. Maybe lean it out a tad. Other than that, it's perfect. Good job man.
Old May 14, 2010, 09:31 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
casper980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I don't trust E85 for track use. Maybe its because I have already blown an engine on the track, maybe its because I was told not to use E85 on the track. E85 is not a consistent fuel from pump to pump or season to season. I would like to see AMS chime in on this and give us their opinion.
Old May 14, 2010, 09:41 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
casper980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also thought that E85 was supposed to have a much richer AFR then petrol. Here is a table I took from wikipedia.

Table

The following table shows the range of air fuel ratios typically used for burning gasoline, E85, and pure ethanol (E100) under an assortment of assumed operating conditions:
Fuel AFRst FARst Equivalence Lambda
Ratio
Gasoline stoichiometric 14.7 0.068 1 1
Gasoline max power rich 12.5 0.08 1.176 0.8503
Gasoline max power lean 13.23 0.0755 1.111 0.900
E10 stoichiometric 14.0 - 14.1 ? ?
E85 stoichiometric 9.765 0.10235 1 1
E85 max power rich 6.975 0.1434 1.40 0.7143
E85 max power lean 8.4687 0.118 1.153 0.8673
E100 stoichiometric 9.0078 0.111 1 1
E100 max power rich 6.429 0.155 1.4 0.714
E100 max power lean 7.8 0.128 1.15 0.870

Looking at this table it shows E85 Max lean mixture to be 8.4687, if your running it at 12:1 then you are WAAYYY lean.

Maybe I am missing something. Chris at AMS does my tuning for track use on pump 93 and my AFR goes to around 11.1 in boost

Last edited by casper980; May 14, 2010 at 09:44 PM.
Old May 15, 2010, 12:51 PM
  #8  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
tscompusa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pa
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
on a gasoline wideband it likes 11.8 usually. my personal vehicle i can do 11.2 to 12.2 it wont knock. More timing is not always better with e85, especially at peak torque/load area. if your cars not knocking lean and knocking rich, id suspect its slightly over mbt. it wont show knock if you run it to lean even if its past mbt.


also every car likes different a/f so test with your vehicle. if you do a pull at 11.5 and then 11.8 and you see gain, then keep it at 11.8. now if you go from 11.8 to 12.0 and see enough gain to make it worth running then keep it there. if you go from 12 to 12.2 and you still see a significant gain, then maybe stick with 12.2, but a road course vehicle id do 11.8 for max, since egt's will be important.

Last edited by tscompusa2; May 15, 2010 at 12:54 PM.
Old May 15, 2010, 03:12 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
1outlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Could it be that in reality by running leaner than most boosted applications (.76-.78 lamda) you are in effect slowing down the burn thus having a somewhat effect as to pulling back timing? E85 at peak load and stoich burns pretty fast whereas rich and lean less so. Could it also be the plug types you guys are having to run triggering the beginnings of pre-ignition?

Not meaning to threadjack here but I posed this question over where Hotrod and Shortbox could see it- note their comments on page 2 of this thread near the bottom;

http://e85forum.com/about1146-0-asc-...be36c25aa6d6fd

Just throwing this in for thought- I think you guys are dead on with what you are doing but wanted another viewpoint from guys who have also been doing boosted E85 for several years in other engine types.

Last edited by 1outlaw; May 15, 2010 at 03:21 PM.
Old May 15, 2010, 03:41 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
 
1outlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Casper- for track use you can be very consistent if you buy E98 in a drum (there is a decent source in Mich) and mix your own with your choice of pump or unleaded race gas (depending on your octane needs).
Old May 15, 2010, 10:29 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
casper980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1outlaw
Casper- for track use you can be very consistent if you buy E98 in a drum (there is a decent source in Mich) and mix your own with your choice of pump or unleaded race gas (depending on your octane needs).
Now that's good info...might be something I look into in the future for a cheaper substitute to race gas. Thank you. So you agree with me that E85 from the pump is not consistent enough for track use? I just want OP to have all the info possible. I know how it feels to call a tow truck at the track and need to replace an engine.
Old May 16, 2010, 03:06 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
1outlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Casper- there are some tunes, boosts, and CR's that will be more safe on hand mixed E85. However- what a lot of track race guys do is drum up from a retail pump what they need for the season and then tune for that. If the engine is really "on the edge" then hand mixed E85 or wait until summer blend is at the pump, then drum enough to carry out a year will work (keep barrels well sealed and in proper place). A few who are NA 15 or 16:1 or very high boost will even go to Rockettbrand's E85 (109 motor/116 research/112 rm/2) but this is pretty costly if you do not need it.

Let me know if you do decide to try the E98/gas mix route Casper- I would dig around to find the thread on another forum where guys were doing this in Michigan and had a local source of E98 direct from an ethanol plant.
Old May 16, 2010, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
goofygrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I have an ECA and I log what the pumps do around here.

They are fairly consistent. We shifted from our winter blend (E78/9) to our summer blend (E83) a few weeks ago. One station was slow to switch though.

We have one station that is true E85 all the time.

ETA: I say 11.8-12.0 (which is what I run). I'd rather run 12.0 with no knock than 11.8 with 1-2c of consistent knock.
Old May 17, 2010, 12:24 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
casper980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1outlaw
Casper- there are some tunes, boosts, and CR's that will be more safe on hand mixed E85. However- what a lot of track race guys do is drum up from a retail pump what they need for the season and then tune for that. If the engine is really "on the edge" then hand mixed E85 or wait until summer blend is at the pump, then drum enough to carry out a year will work (keep barrels well sealed and in proper place). A few who are NA 15 or 16:1 or very high boost will even go to Rockettbrand's E85 (109 motor/116 research/112 rm/2) but this is pretty costly if you do not need it.

Let me know if you do decide to try the E98/gas mix route Casper- I would dig around to find the thread on another forum where guys were doing this in Michigan and had a local source of E98 direct from an ethanol plant.
Outlaw thanks for the info, I will, E85 always looked promising to me, but I never trusted it. What your saying makes sense to me, so I might actually consider it. Does the Rockettbrand cost more than 110 ($6.00+)?

Originally Posted by goofygrin
I have an ECA and I log what the pumps do around here.

They are fairly consistent. We shifted from our winter blend (E78/9) to our summer blend (E83) a few weeks ago. One station was slow to switch though.

We have one station that is true E85 all the time.

ETA: I say 11.8-12.0 (which is what I run). I'd rather run 12.0 with no knock than 11.8 with 1-2c of consistent knock.
OP, take note of what these guys say/do, we don't want to blow up anymore 4G63's
Old May 17, 2010, 08:41 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TheBoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Space time
Posts: 1,278
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
For the past few weeks I have been playing with AFR's, Timing, and Plug gap to fully understand E85. The thing that I have found is that everyone has there own idea of how to tune it.

I have tuned from 12.0-13.0. Now in my experence it seems that the car like a slightly leaner mix. When my car dips into the 11's I will start to get knock, it does not matter what the timing is.

Me personally I am tuning my car in the 12.0-12.3afr range.

So best bet for you is you are going to have to play with it. Also find out what E% you have. That way you have your baseline for a specific E% fuel.


Quick Reply: AFRs for a tracked car and E85?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:13 AM.