Notices
ECU Flash

Injector scaling and latecy for different injectors.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2006, 07:15 AM
  #46  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
justchil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gotcha! I was trying to make it a lot harder than it was.

Small sample of my idle voltage. Idle jumps from 937.5 to 968.75 in this log:

14.1469
14.1469
14.2202
14.2202
14.2202
14.1469
14.2202
14.2935
14.1469
14.1469
14.3668
14.2935
14.2935
14.1469
14.0736


Under WOT the voltages go down a little:

RPM TPS Battery
4562.5 100 14.0003
4781.25 100 13.8537
5000 100 13.927
5187.5 100 13.8537
5406.25 100 13.8537
4125 100 13.7804
4218.75 100 13.8537
4406.25 100 13.7804
4625 100 13.7804
4812.5 100 13.7071
5031.25 100 13.7804

I am running a 2 year old 680mj. Just food for thought... kinda boring here at work today

Last edited by justchil; Jul 10, 2006 at 07:22 AM.
Old Jul 10, 2006, 03:00 PM
  #47  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the relationship between the injector scaling value and the AFR values in the Fuel Map? Is it a linear relationship?

for example, let's say that I am running larger-than-stock injectors on my car which have been tuned via the fuel map only, not via rescaling the injector size. Does increasing the injector scaling by 10% then mandate reducing the fuel table by 10% to keep the AFR the same?

l8r)
Old Jul 10, 2006, 03:29 PM
  #48  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
What is the relationship between the injector scaling value and the AFR values in the Fuel Map? Is it a linear relationship?

for example, let's say that I am running larger-than-stock injectors on my car which have been tuned via the fuel map only, not via rescaling the injector size. Does increasing the injector scaling by 10% then mandate reducing the fuel table by 10% to keep the AFR the same?

l8r)
That is a reasonable assumption, however its not a completely linear relationship because of how injectors work..

If you tuned your map for your injectors (and performance) without the scaling, then you would indeed need to go back and alter the Fuel map if you used the rescaling feature..

If the car was already tuned for 550 injectors, and you added 780's, then rescaling the injectors should bring the tune "Close" to where it was before you added the new injectors, however a retune would be recommended (and likely necessary)

Make any sense?
Old Jul 10, 2006, 03:39 PM
  #49  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, makes perfect sense. I was pretty sure that was going to be the answer, but I wanted to make sure.

The car was doing pretty good on the current tuning methodology until I had the head ported. Now the idle is back to being somewhat erratic - to the point where even upping the idle RPM target is of limited help.

Looks like I get to tune my car from scratch. Oh well, I guess I can post my maps after I'm done then. I shouldn't complain too much, though, the latest round of mods have pushed my VE to ~109% across most of my powerband.

l8r)
Old Jul 10, 2006, 04:00 PM
  #50  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alright, before I dive in, I would like to briefly summarize my understanding of injector scaling on our Evos. Anyone please feel free to jump in to correct any misconceptions:

- For 780cc injectors I will need to adjust the "Injector Scaling" value from 513 (stock) to something between 600 and 660.
- I may need to adjust the "Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation" table to help dial in the idle - If idle fuel trims are positive (lean), then this likely needs to be increased slightly around the 12-13V range to enrichen idle
- May need to adjust the "Accel Enrichment" value (increase) if I start seeing lean conditions on throttle tip-in
- Assuming a stock-injector based fuel map, I now need to dump some 100 Octane gas into the tank, then drive around to dial in the fuel table at partial throttle and WOT.

l8r)
Old Jul 12, 2006, 09:11 AM
  #51  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Ivan_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Middletown, MD
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here are the injector battery comps that I have scaled via numbers only. I pulled the data from the AEMPro software. These should be good starting numbers.

Let me know what you think. I've attached the xls file.

Ivan

HTML Code:
Note: PTE780/880 calculated from 680/1000						

Offset and scaled to match factory ECU 
						
	            7v	 9.4v  11.7v	14v	16.4v	 18.6v
Stock	          1.680 1.032   0.672   0.432   0.264   0.144
PTE1000	          2.186	1.281	0.771	0.458	0.283	0.172
PTE880	          2.186	1.325	0.833	0.534	0.351	0.231
PTE780	          2.186	1.369	0.895	0.610	0.419	0.290
PTE680	          2.186	1.413	0.957	0.687	0.486	0.349
MSD750	          2.186	1.302	0.781	0.452	0.256	0.126
RC720/900	  2.186	1.518	1.032	0.694	0.443	0.268
RC1000	          2.023	1.079	0.641	0.367	0.181	0.049
RC1200	          2.186	2.085	1.581	1.060	0.713	0.471
Holey788	  1.903	0.952	0.573	0.353	0.193	0.093
HKS1000	          2.109	1.189	0.812	0.583	0.382	0.248
FIC650	          2.100	1.071	0.633	0.353	0.175	0.044
FIC850            2.031	0.971	0.591	0.334	0.195	0.106
FIC950	          2.186	1.220	0.706	0.425	0.274	0.175
Attached Files
File Type: zip
injector latency master.zip (14.2 KB, 394 views)
Old Jul 12, 2006, 10:15 AM
  #52  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
dryad001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oak Creek, WI
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ivan_C
Here are the injector battery comps that I have scaled via numbers only. I pulled the data from the AEMPro software. These should be good starting numbers.

Let me know what you think. I've attached the xls file.

Ivan

HTML Code:
Note: PTE780/880 calculated from 680/1000						

Offset and scaled to match factory ECU 
						
	            7v	 9.4v  11.7v	14v	16.4v	 18.6v
Stock	          1.680 1.032   0.672   0.432   0.264   0.144
PTE1000	          2.186	1.281	0.771	0.458	0.283	0.172
PTE880	          2.186	1.325	0.833	0.534	0.351	0.231
PTE780	          2.186	1.369	0.895	0.610	0.419	0.290
PTE680	          2.186	1.413	0.957	0.687	0.486	0.349
MSD750	          2.186	1.302	0.781	0.452	0.256	0.126
RC720/900	  2.186	1.518	1.032	0.694	0.443	0.268
RC1000	          2.023	1.079	0.641	0.367	0.181	0.049
RC1200	          2.186	2.085	1.581	1.060	0.713	0.471
Holey788	  1.903	0.952	0.573	0.353	0.193	0.093
HKS1000	          2.109	1.189	0.812	0.583	0.382	0.248
FIC650	          2.100	1.071	0.633	0.353	0.175	0.044
FIC850            2.031	0.971	0.591	0.334	0.195	0.106
FIC950	          2.186	1.220	0.706	0.425	0.274	0.175

Wow, very nice. My 780's are very close to the PTE780 numbers.
Old Jul 12, 2006, 10:22 AM
  #53  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Ivan_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Middletown, MD
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One thing I noticed, you can't set them to those numbers exactly. You can input the exact numbers but it will change to the next actual value in the rom.
Old Jul 12, 2006, 11:19 AM
  #54  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Ivan_C
One thing I noticed, you can't set them to those numbers exactly. You can input the exact numbers but it will change to the next actual value in the rom.
Yeah its a rounding error.. Being off by 1/1000th is not going to change anything by a huge amount..
Old Jul 12, 2006, 11:23 AM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could someone please answer my earlier question? I need to know if I understand the process before I start making changes to my car...

Thanks in advance.

l8r)
Old Jul 12, 2006, 11:30 AM
  #56  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
dryad001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oak Creek, WI
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
Could someone please answer my earlier question? I need to know if I understand the process before I start making changes to my car...

Thanks in advance.

l8r)

Thats the way I did it, minus the race fuel
Old Jul 12, 2006, 11:30 AM
  #57  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
Alright, before I dive in, I would like to briefly summarize my understanding of injector scaling on our Evos. Anyone please feel free to jump in to correct any misconceptions:

- For 780cc injectors I will need to adjust the "Injector Scaling" value from 513 (stock) to something between 600 and 660.
- I may need to adjust the "Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation" table to help dial in the idle - If idle fuel trims are positive (lean), then this likely needs to be increased slightly around the 12-13V range to enrichen idle
- May need to adjust the "Accel Enrichment" value (increase) if I start seeing lean conditions on throttle tip-in
- Assuming a stock-injector based fuel map, I now need to dump some 100 Octane gas into the tank, then drive around to dial in the fuel table at partial throttle and WOT.

l8r)
Sorry I missed this post..

For 780 cc injectors, I would guess 680-750 would be closest (about 10-20%)
Use the chart that ivan posted as a reference, the most critical values you need to get dialed in are the 11v and 14v ones.. depending on your idle speed and quality of your alternator, the voltage should be somewhere under 12v to just over 13v at idle.. increasing the value, lets the ECU know there's more latency and therefore should cause it to run richer..
Old Jul 12, 2006, 01:08 PM
  #58  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,071
Received 1,056 Likes on 764 Posts
Ivan,

You found my secret.
Old Jul 15, 2006, 07:00 PM
  #59  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Okay guys, I think I have the first data for 1000cc injectors (Buschur which are Precision) The numbers posted for latency aren't quite right for the stock ECU..

I will post the data when I have a few drive cycles (high speed cruising) on the car..
Old Jul 15, 2006, 07:56 PM
  #60  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,800
Received 315 Likes on 247 Posts
Out of curiosity, has anyone switched to Ford/GM style injectors? For most of the RB setups I have done along with old school 280zxt stuff, I used to swap to GM/Ford style injectors as they are much cheaper to purchase($59/per). It requires only a cusom rail and slight mod, if any, to the intake manifold. I was usually able to just change the O-ring on the manifold side to make them work. It depends on the size of the injector tip vs. injector hole in the manifold. A hand drill was an easy fix. Here is a cheap source for GM/Ford Injectors.

RACETRONIX


Quick Reply: Injector scaling and latecy for different injectors.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:30 PM.