Notices
ECU Flash

Injector scaling and latecy for different injectors.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2009, 02:41 AM
  #736  
Evolving Member
 
konstantinosIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Evoland
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Battery voltage Latency for Precision 1200cc ???
Anyone who wish to help?
Old Mar 24, 2009, 10:41 PM
  #737  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
dwnfdrknss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norwalk, Ca
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bump for any any help on denso 720's for an 03 evo
Old Mar 25, 2009, 08:24 AM
  #738  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Chabada15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dwnfdrknss
bump for any any help on denso 720's for an 03 evo
check the last 2 pages dude come on now
Old Mar 25, 2009, 12:45 PM
  #739  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Ok, this is probably a basic part of this concept... but I'm trying to get it now that I dropped in some RC 1200's this weekend.

When you increase the injector latency the result will be more negative fuel trims (more fuel and negative AFR change), because the ECU assumes it takes longer to open the injector and thereby sends the fuel pulse longer.

Is the above statement correct?

If so, I think the method of adjusting latencies for getting the Mid/Low long term trims closer to eachother (mentioned here and here) does not work in practice beyond DSMLink. In trying to get my values closer I've mostly just made my fuel trims drop, and the STFT that used to by a nice straight up and down slope has turned very jagged and sawtoothed, as well as the car *seems* to run worse.

I get the % change at different pulse widths explanation that means that should provide more of a change at idle than cruise by adjusting that latency, but it doesn't seem to work well in practice by my experience. Can anyone else comment?

EDIT: Sorry, I meant to mention I think MAF scaling/tuning should probably replace step 5 & 6 for getting the trims close to the same.

Last edited by fostytou; Mar 25, 2009 at 01:11 PM.
Old Mar 25, 2009, 12:50 PM
  #740  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
wesside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Slc Utah aka SL,UT
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chabada15
check the last 2 pages dude come on now
you mean 20 pages ago
Originally Posted by dwnfdrknss
bump for any any help on denso 720's for an 03 evo

I did this over a year ago

Scaling = 622

4.7V = 3.864
7.0V = 3.456
9.4V = 2.856
11.7V = 1.320
14.0V = 0.888
16.4V = 0.672
18.6V = 0.408
Old Mar 25, 2009, 01:02 PM
  #741  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am about to install some FIC1000's and would like a good starting point if someone has one. I will be doing a tune for pump and a tune for E85.


Thanks in advance

Old Mar 26, 2009, 04:23 AM
  #742  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have looked through the pages and have not been very successful in finding what i am looking for. Noone has a good starting point for these?
Old Mar 26, 2009, 04:40 PM
  #743  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
evodood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: cali
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fostytou
Ok, this is probably a basic part of this concept... but I'm trying to get it now that I dropped in some RC 1200's this weekend.
I would use the same latencies for the rc 1200's as the rc 1000's to start. Reason being is that rc rates the 1200's at 1200cc's at 55psi and at the standard 43.5 psi they flow like 1050's so I would think there would be a negligable difference between these and the 1000cc injectors.

When you increase the injector latency the result will be more negative fuel trims (more fuel and negative AFR change), because the ECU assumes it takes longer to open the injector and thereby sends the fuel pulse longer.

Is the above statement correct?
I think yes. This is also the way I've come to understand it.

If so, I think the method of adjusting latencies for getting the Mid/Low long term trims closer to eachother (mentioned here and here) does not work in practice beyond DSMLink. In trying to get my values closer I've mostly just made my fuel trims drop, and the STFT that used to by a nice straight up and down slope has turned very jagged and sawtoothed, as well as the car *seems* to run worse.



I get the % change at different pulse widths explanation that means that should provide more of a change at idle than cruise by adjusting that latency, but it doesn't seem to work well in practice by my experience. Can anyone else comment?

EDIT: Sorry, I meant to mention I think MAF scaling/tuning should probably replace step 5 & 6 for getting the trims close to the same.


I have no idea about the rest and the MAF scaling...I'm still learning too.

Last edited by evodood; Mar 26, 2009 at 04:42 PM.
Old Mar 26, 2009, 07:31 PM
  #744  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
jid2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Fost,

The stuff mentioned in the early posts is correct. It took me a week to keep it straight in my head but it does infact do as claimed.

1. the 14V latency value is really the only one that counts, the rest are for extremes in battery voltage which you rarely see. So the 14 V value is the critical one. I figured out the slope of the latency line from the spec sheet and then offset the rest of the values after figuring out the 14V one.

2. Changes in latency do effect idle more than cruise, so if your trims are unbalanced adjust latency. If idle trim is higher more latency. If cruise trim is higher less latency. You should be able to make adjustments and see when the trims converge and then diverge.

3. I noticed that you really need to go the whole 16 mins and maybe more to get the trims to settle. Don't cheat at 15 mins and stop, you'll miss that 4th cycle which can really change things.

Last edited by jid2; Mar 26, 2009 at 07:33 PM.
Old Mar 26, 2009, 08:16 PM
  #745  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
jid2,

The 11V is important too.

Both the 14v and 11v are the critical values. But 14v is the more critical because the car runs closest to the 14v most of the time.
Old Mar 26, 2009, 08:31 PM
  #746  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Here are the scaling and latency for FIC 750 injectors

Scaling 650

Latency
3.312
2.04
1.296
0.792
0.72
0.504
0.336

These worked fine and got the trims to +3 on the LTFT_low and LTFT_mid.
Old Mar 27, 2009, 08:23 AM
  #747  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
jid2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Appauldd
jid2,

The 11V is important too.

Both the 14v and 11v are the critical values. But 14v is the more critical because the car runs closest to the 14v most of the time.
I logged voltage for a few days and never saw anything but 14V 99.99% of the time. At Idle there is a voltage dip (10V) about every 4 mins, but it is literally a blip of .25s. I think you are good to use the same slope as what the stated latency should be offset for your 14V findings.
Old Mar 27, 2009, 09:54 AM
  #748  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
steadly2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lincolnton, NC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jid2
I logged voltage for a few days and never saw anything but 14V 99.99% of the time. At Idle there is a voltage dip (10V) about every 4 mins, but it is literally a blip of .25s. I think you are good to use the same slope as what the stated latency should be offset for your 14V findings.
Mine doesn't idle at 14v, it idles at like 12.5-13, and drives at 14-14.5

..... but I'm not an EVO either
Old Mar 27, 2009, 11:10 AM
  #749  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Every single Evo that has been through the shop that has been healthy has idled and cruised at 14v.

The ones that haven't either had battery or alternator problems.
Old Mar 27, 2009, 03:54 PM
  #750  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no help on the fic 1000


Quick Reply: Injector scaling and latecy for different injectors.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:02 PM.