Notices
ECU Flash

Injector scaling and latecy for different injectors.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2009, 08:26 PM
  #781  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was wondering if we could start a new topic just listing all the injectors with their perspective scaling and latency's?
Old Apr 5, 2009, 08:27 PM
  #782  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
It would be great if you could fill in the wiki:
http://evoecu.logic.net/wiki/
Old Apr 5, 2009, 10:20 PM
  #783  
G20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
G20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by G20
Here is mine for the Precision 780cc that I used to achieve -2 and -3 in the LTFT Low and Mid. I have been driving the car almost 100 miles with in the last 3 days. Can it be better?

597

4.6875 3.504
7.03125 2.184
9.375 1.320
11.7188 0.912
14.0625 0.696
16.4062 0.360
18.6768 0.240
To the experts here; do my scale value and latencies above look alright?

My injector is 780 but I can't get any good LTFT trim using most of the values posted here. I followed MalibuJack and l2r99gst posts and able to finally get it dial in with -3 and -2 for the Low and Mid LTFTs and it has been like that for the last few days driving.

Some of the other settings even made my car throw idle too lean p0171 or my fuel trim was too far of range (+12, -15..). Is my scale value is too low for the 780? Thanks.
Old Apr 7, 2009, 10:09 AM
  #784  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tephra
It would be great if you could fill in the wiki:
http://evoecu.logic.net/wiki/
The link to it just reverts back here. And this place is filled with lots of clutter and since the illustrious evom search engine sucks its impossible to find them without searching through hundreds of posts.
Old Apr 7, 2009, 11:25 AM
  #785  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
logic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
No, tephra was suggesting that if you have injector latencies to share (or are going through the trouble of tracking them down anyway), perhaps it would be worthwhile to create a page on the wiki, and get the ball rolling with a central location for this kind of information.
Old Apr 7, 2009, 01:03 PM
  #786  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by project_skyline
The link to it just reverts back here. And this place is filled with lots of clutter and since the illustrious evom search engine sucks its impossible to find them without searching through hundreds of posts.
Originally Posted by logic
No, tephra was suggesting that if you have injector latencies to share (or are going through the trouble of tracking them down anyway), perhaps it would be worthwhile to create a page on the wiki, and get the ball rolling with a central location for this kind of information.
^^ what he said.

Also, if you are having trouble like the rest of us (we are all in this failboat together) you can use google like
Code:
[search terms] site:evolutionm.net
Otherwise we just wind up with thousands of posts like the first one quoted here, which do nothing but aid all of us in going bat **** crazy trying to find actual information.
Old Apr 19, 2009, 03:36 PM
  #787  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have the Low Trim showing -1.2 but the mid is showing -12.6. My STFT are right within +/- 5%. These are my current scaling and latencies.

860

4.6875 3.312
7.03125 1.680
9.375 1.344
11.7188 1.152
14.0625 0.840
16.4062 0.360
18.6768 0.240

860 scaling is what everyone seems to be using for the FIC 1000's. Any ideas on what to adjust to get the mid back in line??
Thanks again

Last edited by SEEnoEVO; Apr 19, 2009 at 03:52 PM.
Old Apr 19, 2009, 06:58 PM
  #788  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Higher scaling
Old Apr 20, 2009, 04:26 AM
  #789  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks. I guess I will give 886 a try. Should I leave the latencies the same for now and just log with the larger scaling?
Old Apr 20, 2009, 10:46 AM
  #790  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by SEEnoEVO
Thanks. I guess I will give 886 a try. Should I leave the latencies the same for now and just log with the larger scaling?
Keep the latencies and try something more like 968 (860 * 1.126) for scaling (seems high though, not sure something else or latencies aren't off).

My method is to get correct latencies, then use scaling to get the mid in check. Lastly rescale the MAF to get Idle in check.
Old Apr 26, 2009, 05:04 PM
  #791  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
OK I am in need of help DESPERATELY!!!! I struggled with the FIC 1000's so I figured I would switch out injectors just to see if I could rule them out. I now have FIC 1050's and am still having tons of issues. I make changes, and the numbers I get from LTFT make no sense. For instance, I was at 1008 scaling and set latencies, Low came in at around -7 and Mid was -12. I figured....well lets up the scaling. I up the scaling to 1044. Then i get Low of -8 and Mid of -11.3. I am completely lost. I know based on them both being negative, I should be upping the scaling even more but with the numbers i keep seeing with the changes, I am not even sure anymore. I have been battling this for about a week and am very frustrated at this time. Someone please help!!! These are my current settings that gave me the low of -8 and mid of -11.3.

Scaling 1044

4.6875 4.512
7.03125 3.408
9.375 1.896
11.7188 1.248
14.0625 0.984
16.4062 0.624
18.6768 0.432
Old Apr 26, 2009, 05:17 PM
  #792  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
bigric09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SEEnoEVO
OK I am in need of help DESPERATELY!!!! I struggled with the FIC 1000's so I figured I would switch out injectors just to see if I could rule them out. I now have FIC 1050's and am still having tons of issues. I make changes, and the numbers I get from LTFT make no sense. For instance, I was at 1008 scaling and set latencies, Low came in at around -7 and Mid was -12. I figured....well lets up the scaling. I up the scaling to 1044. Then i get Low of -8 and Mid of -11.3. I am completely lost. I know based on them both being negative, I should be upping the scaling even more but with the numbers i keep seeing with the changes, I am not even sure anymore. I have been battling this for about a week and am very frustrated at this time. Someone please help!!! These are my current settings that gave me the low of -8 and mid of -11.3.

Scaling 1044

4.6875 4.512
7.03125 3.408
9.375 1.896
11.7188 1.248
14.0625 0.984
16.4062 0.624
18.6768 0.432
Just by looking at the trend for injectors...

1044 is too high for 1050's ... id start with a mid 900 probably maybe even lower. Then also drop your first 3 voltages. Should be a good starting point.
Old Apr 26, 2009, 05:20 PM
  #793  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
SEEnoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
See I thought that if they are both showing negative trims, it means it has to drop fuel by that percentage. The way you counteract that is by raising the scaling. If i drop the scaling down in the 900's it should be dumping much more gas and want to pull even more out. Isnt this correct? Or do I have this all wrong?
Old Apr 26, 2009, 08:47 PM
  #794  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by SEEnoEVO
See I thought that if they are both showing negative trims, it means it has to drop fuel by that percentage. The way you counteract that is by raising the scaling. If i drop the scaling down in the 900's it should be dumping much more gas and want to pull even more out. Isnt this correct? Or do I have this all wrong?
You are correct. I'd try raising the scaling to the next value (or maybe even the one after that). FIC injectors are always very conservatively rated, so don't be afraid to use a big value with FICs. My 1050s scale at 1008 on gasoline. I know other people who have used 1044 for FIC 1050s. My guess is that if you raise the scaling one or two more notches, both trims will be very close to zero.

What voltage does the car run at?
Old Apr 26, 2009, 08:48 PM
  #795  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
yeah... my 1050's were scaled to 1083 on pump..


Quick Reply: Injector scaling and latecy for different injectors.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:14 PM.