let see the dynograph with AFR. eitherway nice numbers.

 

I have a IX that I bought in Nov of 05, what's the difference between the different releases? I'm thinking Mitsu made some code revisions?? Do you build number ranges? Unlikely any physical changes imo.

 

There are three different ECU versions, 13, 14 and 15. There are reports that the earliest version boost higher than the later two, though the code appears the same across all three versions.

 

DBL POST.

 

Here you go.
FYI the AFR sensor pop out on the last run. 1st run was 4th gear, the rest were 3rd. This car is still running rich. None of the new IXs (in my area) has broken 250whp on this dynojet (stock), newer IXs usually dynoed between 235 - 245 stock.

The time on my sig was done with full lift shift and the launch control was not even used.

 

This Dyno run is 100% Stock? No mods at all? Just a tune?

 

need corrected numbers SAE

 

These # are from you IX MR? did u tuned it yourself?

 

http://www.norcalevo.net/index.php?o...9388#msg159388

 

nice gains for the OP.

so the IX i now drive, bought in April this year, is weaker than a IX from say Nov. of 05 because it's boosting less?

 

That's what's being reported by some that have tested both.

 

I guess i would like to see some of the maps (which i know will not happen) to know what the 4G63 likes for fuel and timing i am use to tuning the turbo honda's which seem to be a little more streght forward. (at least for me)

 

Please see the NCE thread for maps and dyno charts.

 

well right now it will not let me in

i will try again later

 

This has to be one of the worst maps I have ever seen.

That is all I have to say. Someone should host those timing maps and post that garbage for analysis here.

You guys would freak.

Nevermind... Here it is...

12 Hours, 60 Pulls, and a full tank of gas. How ridiculous is this?

For the record, I checked the Evom sponsoring vendors list and they are not on the list.