how are you guys logging A/F?
Sep 10, 2006, 10:33 AM
#16
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
You really can't tune closed loop without fooling the 02 sensor.. Unless what you mean is your tuning the open loop cells within closed loop to hit your target AFR's, which in turn will allow the fuel trims to be as close to zero as possible.
There is good news though, I think I found closed loop target tables in the ECU.. working on it for the next few days.
There is good news though, I think I found closed loop target tables in the ECU.. working on it for the next few days.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=220917
And here is the theory behind it from the Innovate forums
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/f...ead.php?t=4505
Sep 10, 2006, 02:54 PM
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ZT2 Selectable Simulated Narrowband Signal Switching Point.
http://www.zeitronix.com/questions/NBpoint.htm
http://www.zeitronix.com/questions/NBpoint.htm
Sep 10, 2006, 03:11 PM
#18
Originally Posted by Spec'd
ZT2 Selectable Simulated Narrowband Signal Switching Point.
http://www.zeitronix.com/questions/NBpoint.htm
http://www.zeitronix.com/questions/NBpoint.htm
Sep 10, 2006, 03:37 PM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
Good to know that ZT2 does that. What others do this? Did you do this Spec'd?
It seems to be plenty lean at idle and low load.
It's admirable how Klaus replies and participates on the Innovative forum.
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/...read.php?t=4505
Last edited by Spec'd; Sep 10, 2006 at 03:40 PM.
Sep 10, 2006, 03:52 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Spec'd
No nj1266, I haven't really found a need to make my closed loop a/f any leaner.
It seems to be plenty lean at idle and low load.
It's admirable how Klaus replies and participates on the Innovative forum.
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/...read.php?t=4505
It seems to be plenty lean at idle and low load.
It's admirable how Klaus replies and participates on the Innovative forum.
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/...read.php?t=4505
Klaus is great. Has has answered every question that I asked.
Sep 10, 2006, 04:02 PM
#21
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
Wow, your running leaner than 14.7:1 at idle. Mine ran 14.5-14.7 at idle, right where it should be. I hope I can get better gas mileage running @ 15.5:1
Klaus is great. Has has answered every question that I asked.
Klaus is great. Has has answered every question that I asked.
even lower on my display. The lower readings are not consistant however.
Sep 12, 2006, 08:07 PM
#22
Originally Posted by nj1266
I use an LM-1 with LMA-2 and XD-16 gauge. I log AFR, RPM, boost, and knock (thanks to xede knock buffer). I also use Evoscan to log timing, knock sum, and load.
I have recently been able to tune closed loop with the LM-1. I hope that this will save me gas. AFAIK, no other AFR meter has the capability to tune closed loop w/o a CEL.
I have recently been able to tune closed loop with the LM-1. I hope that this will save me gas. AFAIK, no other AFR meter has the capability to tune closed loop w/o a CEL.
Anyways, the reason with my little story is to setup a question.
Since you use EVOScan and the knock buffer, have you seen any correlation??
Like when the knock buffer shows a spike way above the noise floor, does EVOScan actully log any knock count???
, But hey, it ain't knocking
Sep 12, 2006, 11:08 PM
#24
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
Little OT, but when I had my VIII, I used the Zt-2 and the knock buffer to log "knock". Now that we have EVOScan, when I hooked up the Zt-2 in the IX, I didnt hook up the knock buffer because I'm just gonna use EVOScan.
Anyways, the reason with my little story is to setup a question.
Since you use EVOScan and the knock buffer, have you seen any correlation??
Like when the knock buffer shows a spike way above the noise floor, does EVOScan actully log any knock count???
Anyways, the reason with my little story is to setup a question.
Since you use EVOScan and the knock buffer, have you seen any correlation??
Like when the knock buffer shows a spike way above the noise floor, does EVOScan actully log any knock count???
Sep 13, 2006, 07:17 PM
#27
Originally Posted by Spec'd
ZT2 Selectable Simulated Narrowband Signal Switching Point.
http://www.zeitronix.com/questions/NBpoint.htm
http://www.zeitronix.com/questions/NBpoint.htm
Sep 13, 2006, 09:41 PM
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
And when I said the knock buffer detected knock very well (before EVOScan), everyone doubt me and said I was wrong. 
I was thinking about getting a knock buffer in addition to EcuScan.
Sep 13, 2006, 09:42 PM
#30
Originally Posted by Spec'd
I've read that a knock buffer works well with the ZT2.
I was thinking about getting a knock buffer in addition to EcuScan.
I was thinking about getting a knock buffer in addition to EcuScan.