Evo IX 2-byte Load & Lean Spool for Dummies
#106
Hey guys, i have followed the instructions for my rom which is 88580014 ADM evoIX and i can see the two high and low 2 byte tables after adding the lines in with the editor but the original value for both before i am ready to change it is 65535, this doesnt sound correct ??? for both to be the same value??? and also they are different from the ones that are on the original post that i should see before making changes to the value
#108
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: on earth
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any more info on the EDM 88840016 ROM (2 byte load)?
Haven't quit understood all this yet, but when I log "Load MUT 2Byte Mod" I get some wierd values (between 2000-5000). Can someone confirm that these values are useless without doing the mod in the XML and ROM file? Haven't really seen any explanatory background info on the 2-byte load topic..
Haven't quit understood all this yet, but when I log "Load MUT 2Byte Mod" I get some wierd values (between 2000-5000). Can someone confirm that these values are useless without doing the mod in the XML and ROM file? Haven't really seen any explanatory background info on the 2-byte load topic..
idling i see 2500......
that cant be right
#110
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not just try and load up a USDM ver 15 ROM onto your ECU and see if that works? If it does, just follow the directions here to log your 2-byte load. You can always flash it back if the car doesn't like the ROM.
#111
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
I think the better idea would be to post the rom and let the people who look for the 2byte values tell him where it is. Plus then anyone else in future with the same rom will be able to get 2byte as well.
#112
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: on earth
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1^ I cant agree with you more i think out roms are quite different.
Like we don't have a MAP sensor on top of intake manifold.
GOD know how it works out Manifold pressure..
Why didnt Mitso make them all the same.....
Like we don't have a MAP sensor on top of intake manifold.
GOD know how it works out Manifold pressure..
Why didnt Mitso make them all the same.....
#113
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes the only downside is the dead spot during spool up. You need to manually lean it out or else spool will suffer greatly.
However if you truly want to make the most power having this featured disabled can help truly.
Those with tuning knowledge should easily figure out why.
Last edited by Ph3n1x; Aug 18, 2007 at 09:41 PM.
#114
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
I wouldnt use a USDM map though in my attempt. The 885xxxx13 from Aus was pretty close because before their was a proper definition it had been practice to use that ROM. The only thing that didnt cross correctly was the stationary rev limit, where it was defined as 2798 it was actually 274a. I cant claim credit for any of that, but I have been checking some of the addresses between the two and there are some definite similarities (obviously).
I think the better idea would be to post the rom and let the people who look for the 2byte values tell him where it is. Plus then anyone else in future with the same rom will be able to get 2byte as well
JB
#115
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
Any more info on the EDM 88840016 ROM (2 byte load)?
Haven't quit understood all this yet, but when I log "Load MUT 2Byte Mod" I get some wierd values (between 2000-5000). Can someone confirm that these values are useless without doing the mod in the XML and ROM file? Haven't really seen any explanatory background info on the 2-byte load topic..
Haven't quit understood all this yet, but when I log "Load MUT 2Byte Mod" I get some wierd values (between 2000-5000). Can someone confirm that these values are useless without doing the mod in the XML and ROM file? Haven't really seen any explanatory background info on the 2-byte load topic..
So i'd go with a "yeah its useless".
Last edited by codgi; Aug 19, 2007 at 12:07 AM.
#118
#119
BTW, I've found the location of the MUT table (not difficult) but I don't have IDApro to find out the loadcalc routine... MUT location is 0x0377FA (map 88840016)...
Any suggestion?
Any suggestion?