Notices
ECU Flash

how-to: ECU-based direct boost control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #346  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by bnice01
alright mrfred should be my last question LOL.

for tephra v5 all you have to do for the alternate boost if using direct boost control, is to change the scaling from load8 to psia8?

I also changed the name to "Alternate Baseline Boost".
Haven't looked at tephra's mods yet, but I think you've got it right: The alternate table load values get converted to psia8, and the table can be renamed.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #347  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by bnice01
alright mrfred should be my last question LOL.

for tephra v5 all you have to do for the alternate boost if using direct boost control, is to change the scaling from load8 to psia8?

I also changed the name to "Alternate Baseline Boost".

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...&postcount=331
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 03:06 AM
  #348  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 8
From: New Hampshire, USA
After switching to Tephra v5, the error correction seems to be screwed up.

I double checked my Boost Error RAM Address as well as my Adder and Baseline Boost tables... everything look good.

The problem I'm getting is, when I log Boost Error, it shows error is always -3... even if I'm overboosting past my tuned boost points. So basically I have no error correction.
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #349  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
Mine does not do that. I am also using the v5 patch.
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:27 AM
  #350  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
what correction interval shameless?
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 06:09 AM
  #351  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 8
From: New Hampshire, USA
Correction Interval 1

Old Apr 9, 2008 | 06:13 AM
  #352  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 8
From: New Hampshire, USA
I think I found my problem.

SHLR->SHLL for EBC: Stock will read 4A01. Change it to 4A00
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #353  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by ShamelessCookie
I think I found my problem.

SHLR->SHLL for EBC: Stock will read 4A01. Change it to 4A00
That would do it.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 01:49 PM
  #354  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL


Is WGDC correction % supposed to look like that? It flatlines 16% as soon as I'm spooled.

Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="WGDC Correction" LogReference="WGDCCorr" RequestID="8B" Eval="0.5*x-64" Unit="WGDC%" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-50" GaugeMax="50" ChartMin="-50" ChartMax="50" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Everything else has been just peachy
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #355  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
What is your MAX WGDC Correction table set to?
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 02:06 PM
  #356  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,071
Likes: 1,056
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Have you done the mods in your rom to support the WGDC Correction logging?

<table name="Load Error RAM Address" category="Turbo" address="41E06" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>

<table name="Load Error RAM Address in Load Error Table" category="Turbo" address="7254" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>

<table name="MUT8A" category="MUT" address="3F0AE" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>

<table name="MUT8B" category="MUT" address="3F0B2" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>

In EcuFlash:

The "Load Error RAM Address" and "Load Error RAM Address in Load Error Table" will both read: 69CA. Change both to 6EE2 (again, you'll need to enter it as 0x....)

Change MUT8A will read 6ACD. Change it to 6EE3 (again enter it as 0x....)

Change MUT8B will read 6B41. Change it to 6EE9 (enter it as 0x....)
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #357  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by MR Turco
What is your MAX WGDC Correction table set to?
Yeah, something is not right. What razorlab said, and would be good to log and post the WGDC as well.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #358  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 8
From: New Hampshire, USA
Originally Posted by ShamelessCookie
I think I found my problem.

SHLR->SHLL for EBC: Stock will read 4A01. Change it to 4A00
I found this is an easy way to toggle on/off error correction (assuming the -3psi correction value is 0)... certainly easier than emptying the correction table and then re-creating it.

What exactly does this do, mrfred?
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #359  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
SHLR = divide by 2
SHLL = multiply by 2

These are used to scale the values read from the boost control RAM variable. When switching from load control to psi control, I need to multiply the boost reading by a factor of 4 to bring the values into a range that is suitable for the range of values that can be entered in the BDEL tables. Using SHLR will make the ECU think the boost is very low.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #360  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 6
From: Berkeley, CA
mrfred, have you had an opportunity to look at 96530006, by any chance?


Quick Reply: how-to: ECU-based direct boost control



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26 PM.