Notices
ECU Flash

how-to: ECU-based direct boost control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #646  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by mplspilot
Right click on BDEL tables, edit, change scaling to psia8. It'll show values in PSI for direct (psi based) boost control. They are the same exact tables as "Baseline Boost", use whichever, changing one set changes the other.
Ah I see, thank you so much!!
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #647  
evowilling's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Are there any tuners in florida utilize ECU-based direct boost control v/ the tehpra mod?
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #648  
fixem2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: USA
4 wheek slide is located in Florida. You can also try Mellon Tuning.
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 06:55 AM
  #649  
AlexEvo6's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: France
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
Yes it is,lol. I have a 3.5 bar Zeitronix map sensor but it hasn't been dialed in to replace the JDM map just yet (waiting for MrFreds magic to happen when he has time). Its roughly the same cost as the JDM map but with less resolution since its range is .5-4.5 volts but it should get the job done once MrFred can find a way to increase the resolution.
Bump for it, just for info
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #650  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
BoostError definition problem?

I'm using the JDM MAP & a pill-mod to control boost. I've got my WGDC dialed in for 24lb from spool to redline. It's still needs some more tweaking, but it's getting close:



In my car a 2nd gear pull lasts about 2-3 seconds, so with the correction interval set to 1, the ECU has about two opportunities to apply corrections (=not much). Based on that, I'm trying to dial in the WGDC to get as close to desired as possible for 2nd gear pulls, and then use the correction tables to tune for the higher gears.

The problem I've run into is that the BoostError logged in EvoScan isn't always right. My boost target is set to 24 psi from 4k rpm to redline, in the logs I see stuff like this (RPM, Boost, Error):


3,719 19.16 -3.09
3,875 24.77 -1.54
4,156 25.35 1.44
4,625 22.65 -1.06
4,969 23.81 -0.68
5,344 25.35 0.09
5,688 24.58 0.67
6,031 23.61 -1.06


On the 2nd point (3875), the error is negative when boost is 24.77 psi, all the other points are fine though. Anybody know what's up with that or how to fix it?
Attached Thumbnails how-to: ECU-based direct boost control-boosttarget.jpg   how-to: ECU-based direct boost control-wgdc.jpg  
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 03:53 PM
  #651  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
No way to fix it, error correction and the changes it makes lag behind boost. Especially on spool-up because it happens very quickly.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #652  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by mplspilot
No way to fix it, error correction and the changes it makes lag behind boost. Especially on spool-up because it happens very quickly.
thanks for the reply, but you misunderstood my question. The problem is not with the error correction, but the BoostError value (as reported by EvoScan). Since boost is above 24psi (the target) @ 3875rpm, the BoostError should be positive, but it shows as negative, which is obviously wrong. .

To me that says there's a problem with the way BoostError is being calculated within the ECU, or how it is being reported by EvoScan)?
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:41 PM
  #653  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by voidhawk
thanks for the reply, but you misunderstood my question. The problem is not with the error correction, but the BoostError value (as reported by EvoScan). Since boost is above 24psi (the target) @ 3875rpm, the BoostError should be positive, but it shows as negative, which is obviously wrong. .

To me that says there's a problem with the way BoostError is being calculated within the ECU, or how it is being reported by EvoScan)?
I've never had that issue. What entry are you using for evoscan?

These?

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Boost Error" LogReference="BoostError" RequestID="8A" Eval="0.0241*x-3.087" Unit="psi" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-5" GaugeMax="5" ChartMin="-5" ChartMax="5" ScalingFactor="1" Notes=""/>

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="WGDC Correction" LogReference="WGDCCorr" RequestID="8B" Eval="0.5*x-64" Unit="WGDC%" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-50" GaugeMax="50" ChartMin="-50" ChartMax="50" ScalingFactor="1" Notes=""/>

also, what is your boost adder and what is your local atmospheric pressure?
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #654  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I'm using the same definitions as you showed. The question about the boost adder is interesting though. I'm using 14.7psi (sea-level) and according to the weather service it was 14.61 psi this morning when I logged the data. Doesn't seem like enough to account for what's in the log, but that was a good idea.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:09 PM
  #655  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Originally Posted by voidhawk
thanks for the reply, but you misunderstood my question. The problem is not with the error correction, but the BoostError value (as reported by EvoScan). Since boost is above 24psi (the target) @ 3875rpm, the BoostError should be positive, but it shows as negative, which is obviously wrong. .

To me that says there's a problem with the way BoostError is being calculated within the ECU, or how it is being reported by EvoScan)?
I do understand your question. It happens because your boost changes faster than it recalculates the error. (e.g that error may have been calculated 20ms before when the boost was 21psi.)
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #656  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by mplspilot
I do understand your question. It happens because your boost changes faster than it recalculates the error. (e.g that error may have been calculated 20ms before when the boost was 21psi.)
sorry, I guess I misunderstood your answer . Nothing much that can be done is this case ... should I be logging ECULoad to make sure the ECU isn't overloaded with a 1 sec error correction interval?
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #657  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by voidhawk
In my car a 2nd gear pull lasts about 2-3 seconds, so with the correction interval set to 1, the ECU has about two opportunities to apply corrections (=not much).
FYI, the first set of posts note that the correction interval is roughly equal to .08-.1s per pass-through. So over 2 seconds you have roughly 20-25 corrections occurring.

Also, regarding your last question... ecuload is related to the "load" of the engine, not the processor in the ECU.
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #658  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by fostytou
FYI, the first set of posts note that the correction interval is roughly equal to .08-.1s per pass-through. So over 2 seconds you have roughly 20-25 corrections occurring.

Also, regarding your last question... ecuload is related to the "load" of the engine, not the processor in the ECU.
yes was about to say, 1 in the interval setting isn't 1 sec it's .1sec

If you visually plot the boost error at the default 10 , 5 and then 1 you will see just how fast 1 updates compared.
Old May 16, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #659  
Evo8Emperor's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 1
From: Rhode Island
Hows it goin guys. Mr.Fred thanks again for your work seems like I'll using it to tune my new direct boost control system in a few days.

My HKS evc just **** the bed on me and I cant get anymore than 11 psi out of it. It was limiting me to 25 psi until I adjusted my wastegate and I got 27-28 psi out of it.

I was going through all the directions and looking at my BEC table here

I for some reason have messed up values instead of your scale.

Would you by any chance know what I did ?

I did add the mut address's seeing I have the mut table I just changed them there. I went over everything also and it all seems right but who knows.
Old May 16, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #660  
nano's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by Evo8Emperor
Hows it goin guys. Mr.Fred thanks again for your work seems like I'll using it to tune my new direct boost control system in a few days.

My HKS evc just **** the bed on me and I cant get anymore than 11 psi out of it. It was limiting me to 25 psi until I adjusted my wastegate and I got 27-28 psi out of it.

I was going through all the directions and looking at my BEC table here
I for some reason have messed up values instead of your scale.

Would you by any chance know what I did ?

I did add the mut address's seeing I have the mut table I just changed them there. I went over everything also and it all seems right but who knows.
I'd double check you added the proper definitions to the xml files, along with the proper scalings.

Did you add the following?

Code:
<scaling name="BoostErrorPsi" units="psi" toexpr="(x-128)/(8*5.18)" frexpr="x*8*5.18+128" format="%.1f" min="-3.1" max="3.1" inc="0.1" storagetype="uint16" endian="little"/>


Quick Reply: how-to: ECU-based direct boost control



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 PM.