Notices
ECU Flash

how-to: ECU-based direct boost control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #1051  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Just in case you didn't know, should we specify some basics?...


The boost solenoid is a valve that will prevent the wastegate from receiving true pressure by closing the line to turbo outlet pressure. This will make possible boosting a higher pressure than the wastegate actuator spring (12psi).
Wastegate duty cycle: the boost solenoid valve cycle On/Off at a frequency near 20 times per second. The WGDC value is the percent of time of this cycle that the valve is shut. So at 100 WGDC, the valve is shut 100% of the time. At 50%, the On and Off times are equal. That's how you control boost.

(I had time to lose )
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #1052  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by ReaperX
I am with Raptord on opening this up for some debate.

To me it may not be an issue to someone who simply dd's or does the occaisional un-sanctioned race, but to say a track day, tt, or road racer it may be an issue. Especially late in a session or race when everything is hot already and maybe the turbo starts getting outside of its efficiency range trying to hit a desired load.

Not saying it would but..... what if?
^^
It would ensure even track times/power ... on hot car yes it could be harder on the turbo

it also maintain much more consistency with the fuel and timing maps and makes the tuning be easier.
Load is calculated for a reason and it's useful to take advantage of the variables that comes into play.

Last edited by domyz; Jan 4, 2013 at 05:09 PM.
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 10:17 PM
  #1053  
Eisen7's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Just wondering if anyone has seen 1.5-2psi differences in boost from just a 0.5% change in the WGDC table? I'm a bit surprised at how sensitive the boost is to WGDC changes...

Mods are Grimmspeed 3 port, Evo 9 turbo, Kando 18psi actuator preloaded, Tomei Pon-R 270's and usual intake/exhaust mods. Boost target is about 24psi, but it jumps between 23-25 at 4250rpm with just a 0.5% WGDC change.

Perhaps I'm being too fussy! But I haven't seen this with other cars
Old Nov 18, 2013 | 08:49 PM
  #1054  
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 157
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by Eisen7
Just wondering if anyone has seen 1.5-2psi differences in boost from just a 0.5% change in the WGDC table? I'm a bit surprised at how sensitive the boost is to WGDC changes...

Mods are Grimmspeed 3 port, Evo 9 turbo, Kando 18psi actuator preloaded, Tomei Pon-R 270's and usual intake/exhaust mods. Boost target is about 24psi, but it jumps between 23-25 at 4250rpm with just a 0.5% WGDC change.

Perhaps I'm being too fussy! But I haven't seen this with other cars


Did you boost leak test? A boost leak could cause the variation you are seeing.
What Blow Off Valve are you running? It could be leaking again affecting your target boost.
What is your WGDC at 4000 RPM for your 24 psi target? I found mine spiked if I increased from 98 to 98.5% - solution was a stiffer spring and so I moved to a 25psi WGA to get the WGDC back down into a usable range.
Old Nov 18, 2013 | 09:53 PM
  #1055  
Eisen7's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 1
From: Australia
It was leak tested recently with no issues. BOV is a Turbosmart metal recirc type. Not sure if they are prone to leaking or not...

WGDC at 4000-4250 is only 55.5%. Note that we only just recently put this new actuator on his car, which made 15psi with 0% WGDC and no more adjustment available on the rod. His old actuator only managed 10psi, so I figured 15psi was better if we were chasing 23-24psi.
Old Mar 11, 2014 | 03:10 PM
  #1056  
azzaevoviii's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
quick question in regards to the base boost low and high gear tables, in the original posts the guide says the max those tables can display is 24.6 but I notice the scaling for the JDM3-bar has a max scaling of 24.6 but my omni 4 bar map sensor scaling (which is what I have) it says the display max is 30.1 as per this scaling

<scaling name="psia8" units="psia" toexpr="x/(4.23*2)" frexpr="x*(2*4.23)" format="%.1f" min="0" max="30.1" inc="0.1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>

Does this mean when setting the base boost and boost adder if I am aiming for 27 psi I can put 27psi in the base boost tables and just put my local atmospheric value in the boost adder table in my case 14.2 as my map sensor reads zero psi with just accessories on in evoscan with the formula set as 0.2369*x-14.2

Reason I ask all this is because I followed the guide originally and to aim for my 27psi set the base boost tables to 24.6 and set the boost adder to 16.6 ie 27psi + 14.2 - 24.6 = 16.6 and I was overshooting by 2-3 psi and hitting 29-30 psi but if I remove the boost adder it follows my baseline wgdc table

Last edited by azzaevoviii; Mar 11, 2014 at 04:06 PM.
Old Mar 11, 2014 | 06:27 PM
  #1057  
ReaperX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 914
Likes: 2
From: Greenville, SC
Did you zero out the correction table as well as zero out the table labeled max upward correction when tuning? Did you keep the max upward correction zero'd after tuning?
Old Mar 11, 2014 | 06:55 PM
  #1058  
azzaevoviii's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
yes
this was how i had it during tuning of the bwgdc
Name:  correction_zps0d13d8b4.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  40.9 KB

this is how I had it after tuning and correction turned on, logged showed it overshot the targets but didnt try to correct at all during the run
Name:  correction-on_zps189bc111.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  37.3 KB
Old Mar 23, 2014 | 02:44 PM
  #1059  
killerpenguin21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 11
From: Big city, Bright lights
so im having a little trouble. my car is tuned on V7 with ecu boost right now, but i need to build up my old stock rom to match to use for inspection purposes.

i added the xml to my 88590015 xml but the addresses populating some of the boxes are not correct to start and the error correction/target tables are not appearing correctly.

what am i doing wrong? im wondering if i have some other mod on that xml i forgot about...maybe i should start with a clean one? i havent messed with xml in like a year so i feel dumb right now...
Old Mar 23, 2014 | 03:04 PM
  #1060  
ReaperX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 914
Likes: 2
From: Greenville, SC
I would just download a clean xml and make any needed changes from there.
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 02:54 PM
  #1061  
Werdna06's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Groton, CT
i'm having issues with tephramod ecu controlled boost as well. wgdc is logging what i'm telling it to do and i'm still only seeing wastegate spring pressure. i have evo 9 with grimmspeed 3 port. correction is zeroed out and i've checked the formulas multiple times. is there anyone i could send my rom and xml file to that would look it over for idiot errors please?
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 03:10 PM
  #1062  
killerpenguin21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 11
From: Big city, Bright lights
what are youre wgdc's right now?
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 03:14 PM
  #1063  
ronaldo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 26
From: New Jersey
Also check all your connections for boost leaks.
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 03:30 PM
  #1064  
Werdna06's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Groton, CT
60% with higher rpms and gears tapering to 57%. i don't have a boost leak tester right now but before i installed the ebcs i had a hallman mbc with no issues.
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 03:50 PM
  #1065  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,071
Likes: 1,056
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Sounds like you have the 3 port installed incorrectly or a bad 3 port.


Quick Reply: how-to: ECU-based direct boost control



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 PM.