PATCH: NLTS + Valet + KnockCEL
Nov 16, 2007, 02:53 AM
#841
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Qatar
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good ques
yeah wat if we flash the 94..0008 to the jap 93660005 would there be any problem??... or is the hex addressing diff in different definintions.... if that'd work than no problem for the 2byte+NTLS patch etc......wat'd u say.....
Nov 16, 2007, 06:07 AM
#844
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yep 2 byte works fine,
also as this is a JDM rom it has no rear 02 sensor, or any sort of evap or fuel purge systems installed,
I will email anybody who wants it a copy with the 2 byte load installed its 106kb zipped so I cant post it up here,
Last edited by BarryC; Nov 16, 2007 at 06:12 AM.
Nov 16, 2007, 07:12 AM
#846
Evolving Member
Nov 16, 2007, 09:26 AM
#847
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the way I see it, mitsubishi developed the evo 7 and 8 ecu with the same Hitachi sh processor, now surely the ecu for all the 7 and 8, 4 plug's are identical???
I have been through the wiring diagrams for the 7 and 8 and apart from the USDM the wiring is identical for both models the USDM has a few more outputs for emissions related stuff and a Map sensor but nothing major in the difference,
but all the EDM and JDM wiring diagrams are pretty much identical for the 4 plug models, so this means that the roms are pretty much identical???
I mean the core programming has to be the same as the ecu is the same and so is the wiring, so why are there so many different roms floating around,
it must be changes to things like different maps for different markets and maybe a few minor changes to other ecu subsystems or an improvement to the code or some things are in a different place in the rom but nothing major it still works the same way, so why are they not interchangeable or is it a bad idea to swap them around ???
Nov 16, 2007, 09:31 AM
#848
HMMMMMMM been thinking about this for a while and maybe Tephra or someone who has been through the rom code could answer,
the way I see it, mitsubishi developed the evo 7 and 8 ecu with the same Hitachi sh processor, now surely the ecu for all the 7 and 8, 4 plug's are identical???
I have been through the wiring diagrams for the 7 and 8 and apart from the USDM the wiring is identical for both models the USDM has a few more outputs for emissions related stuff and a Map sensor but nothing major in the difference,
but all the EDM and JDM wiring diagrams are pretty much identical for the 4 plug models, so this means that the roms are pretty much identical???
I mean the core programming has to be the same as the ecu is the same and so is the wiring, so why are there so many different roms floating around,
it must be changes to things like different maps for different markets and maybe a few minor changes to other ecu subsystems or an improvement to the code or some things are in a different place in the rom but nothing major it still works the same way, so why are they not interchangeable or is it a bad idea to swap them around ???
the way I see it, mitsubishi developed the evo 7 and 8 ecu with the same Hitachi sh processor, now surely the ecu for all the 7 and 8, 4 plug's are identical???
I have been through the wiring diagrams for the 7 and 8 and apart from the USDM the wiring is identical for both models the USDM has a few more outputs for emissions related stuff and a Map sensor but nothing major in the difference,
but all the EDM and JDM wiring diagrams are pretty much identical for the 4 plug models, so this means that the roms are pretty much identical???
I mean the core programming has to be the same as the ecu is the same and so is the wiring, so why are there so many different roms floating around,
it must be changes to things like different maps for different markets and maybe a few minor changes to other ecu subsystems or an improvement to the code or some things are in a different place in the rom but nothing major it still works the same way, so why are they not interchangeable or is it a bad idea to swap them around ???
I.e week 2 - week 5 94170008
week 6 - week 9 93560005
etc etc
Nov 16, 2007, 09:41 AM
#849
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nov 16, 2007, 09:58 AM
#850
I'm not quite sure I understand the EcuFlash obtained ID as well.
Interestingly, my ROM ID, first recognized as 96420008 with v1.29 and earlier but now is 96420007 with newer versions, is strikingly similar to the lable on the ECU itself which reads:
MN191022
E6T3488XXX
46020008
Anyone know where the ID's came from?
Is it Mitsubishi or Colby manufactured (the ID not the code)?
Interestingly, my ROM ID, first recognized as 96420008 with v1.29 and earlier but now is 96420007 with newer versions, is strikingly similar to the lable on the ECU itself which reads:
MN191022
E6T3488XXX
46020008
Anyone know where the ID's came from?
Is it Mitsubishi or Colby manufactured (the ID not the code)?
Nov 16, 2007, 03:20 PM
#852
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Qatar
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm
nice discussion... so it means that there would be additional code fer handlling the rear O2+evap or purge thingy the rest would be the same??..... is it like that or the adressing is diff for the USDM.... plz shed some heavenly light on this....
