Let's see your fully tuned timing maps
#2447
Evolving Member
Anyway I think I should pay some more attention to the high rpm spool up areas. Flooring the pedal from 4,5-5K sometimes, rarely, inconsistently makes my CEL flash slowly(knocksum 3-4).
#2448
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Well it was 8* for some time when I switched from stock turbo, that was really too much )) That produced some more torque, but was knocking pretty often. 5-6* seems to be optimal for street use now, as it produces not much less torque than 8* but never knocks. May be I would drop 2 more degrees from the whole map if I go to the track or if the gas become worse.
Anyway I think I should pay some more attention to the high rpm spool up areas. Flooring the pedal from 4,5-5K sometimes, rarely, inconsistently makes my CEL flash slowly(knocksum 3-4).
Anyway I think I should pay some more attention to the high rpm spool up areas. Flooring the pedal from 4,5-5K sometimes, rarely, inconsistently makes my CEL flash slowly(knocksum 3-4).
#2449
Evolving Member
I run Ron98, thats something similar to 93octane in US, but doesn't contain so much ethanol and more knock prone.
I am shooting for 25 psi peak tapering to 22-ish at redline, but sometimes it overboost up to 26-27 at peak torque.
#2450
Evolving Member
Peak load 270-280 at 3250 @ 4rth gear.
A bit higher spoolup timing makes it knock time to time.
Last edited by Biggy VIII; Sep 30, 2013 at 03:54 PM.
#2451
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
I have a IX on crappy CA 91oct that has 5* at 200 load and 1-2* at peak boost (24psi). The IX's use lower timing than VIII, so it seems like your 93oct evo viii should be able to take more on spoolup.
#2452
Evolving Member
to be honest, im not as familiar with the VIII, but it doesn't seem right to me that it can only take 5* at 200 load and it can still take the same 5* at 300 load. You say that you get knock on spoolup with more timing than you have... could it be phantom knock? is something rattling? i.e. downpipe rattling crossbars or something?
I have a IX on crappy CA 91oct that has 5* at 200 load and 1-2* at peak boost (24psi). The IX's use lower timing than VIII, so it seems like your 93oct evo viii should be able to take more on spoolup.
I have a IX on crappy CA 91oct that has 5* at 200 load and 1-2* at peak boost (24psi). The IX's use lower timing than VIII, so it seems like your 93oct evo viii should be able to take more on spoolup.
Evo9 has mivec and I bet you have 28,8 in your map at peak boost. It seems to me thats about 4* more advanced cam comparing to evo8 cams installed straight up. If I advance my cams so much, it should spool faster, gain some low end torque and I will be able to run only 2-3* timing knock-free.
Actually I had an idea to venture a mivec swap...
Last edited by Biggy VIII; Sep 30, 2013 at 05:07 PM.
#2453
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
I believe it may be some phantom knock(2-4) as it was not constant, but I decided to drop down a couple degrees on spoolup from 140load to be more confident in my tune and it helped a bit and almost fully eliminated it.
Evo9 has mivec and I bet you have 28,8 in your map at peak boost. It seems to me thats about 4* more advanced cam comparing to evo8 cams installed straight up. If I advance my cams so much, it should spool faster, gain some low end torque and I will be able to run only 2-3* timing knock-free.
Actually I had an idea to venture a mivec swap...
Evo9 has mivec and I bet you have 28,8 in your map at peak boost. It seems to me thats about 4* more advanced cam comparing to evo8 cams installed straight up. If I advance my cams so much, it should spool faster, gain some low end torque and I will be able to run only 2-3* timing knock-free.
Actually I had an idea to venture a mivec swap...
I would smoothen up the middle of the map. the 100-140 areas timing is dropping WAY too quick.
Your peak torque timing is a bit on the high side.
#2458
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Spool timing drop faster than usual, but it's because you hit 220load with a 2,3L PTE5858 at peak load. This points to me that you're on SD right? It's like if VE maps would be set too low. With that setup, you should be hitting over 300 load, even on mild boost. This would give you more map resolution for tuning.
At cruise (2.5@3.5kRPM) the total timing (EGR advance + high oct timing map) should be between 40 and 45*. You are under 30*, this thing must feel pretty heavy (bye bye mpg).
#2460
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Still a little soft, take the OEM VIII timing map and start from there, no need to run less than OEM cruise timing. You actually can raise EGR enabled advance to easily save fuel.
And a little hint, 0-10-20 load timing can use a little bit less timing because it help smoothing the transition from throttle on to throttle off.
Here is my latest timing map, pretty agressive on cruise (38*map + 5* EGR), but no knock and nice MPG.
Timing map
SD tuned, Hitting 270 load @ 3250, to 250 at 7400. Not much taper because I run flat 24psi (modded stock catback but still restrictive ; 3" CBE in fabrication right now)
EGR
And a little hint, 0-10-20 load timing can use a little bit less timing because it help smoothing the transition from throttle on to throttle off.
Here is my latest timing map, pretty agressive on cruise (38*map + 5* EGR), but no knock and nice MPG.
Timing map
SD tuned, Hitting 270 load @ 3250, to 250 at 7400. Not much taper because I run flat 24psi (modded stock catback but still restrictive ; 3" CBE in fabrication right now)
EGR
Last edited by domyz; Oct 3, 2013 at 06:52 PM.