Let's see your fully tuned timing maps
Jan 8, 2008, 05:37 AM
#273
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
maybe its the number of horsepower he expects to gain from tune to tune ?
or maybe its an old jestr ttp favorite move ? lol
im kidding im kidding ....
whatever the 69 is for, it sure does work. Im only able to put 34.5 in that square
or maybe its an old jestr ttp favorite move ? lol
im kidding im kidding ....
whatever the 69 is for, it sure does work. Im only able to put 34.5 in that square
Jan 12, 2008, 12:57 AM
#275
Isn't it correct to say it doesn't matter what number is fed to the coils from the ecu's map, so long as the peak psi (not from knock) of the combustion hit's when the crank is at about 20* on the power stroke, regardless of RPM and load?
Too many factors effect the time from when the spark light's, to when the first flame starts, the flame speed and I think theres another FF that happens too. The condition of the coils, even the gap plays a role in the spark ignition lag that will have an effect on where the actual timing really lights combustion.
Timing map values, bah
Too many factors effect the time from when the spark light's, to when the first flame starts, the flame speed and I think theres another FF that happens too. The condition of the coils, even the gap plays a role in the spark ignition lag that will have an effect on where the actual timing really lights combustion.
Timing map values, bah
Jan 12, 2008, 10:26 PM
#278
Isn't it correct to say it doesn't matter what number is fed to the coils from the ecu's map, so long as the peak psi (not from knock) of the combustion hit's when the crank is at about 20* on the power stroke, regardless of RPM and load?
Too many factors effect the time from when the spark light's, to when the first flame starts, the flame speed and I think theres another FF that happens too. The condition of the coils, even the gap plays a role in the spark ignition lag that will have an effect on where the actual timing really lights combustion.
Timing map values, bah
Too many factors effect the time from when the spark light's, to when the first flame starts, the flame speed and I think theres another FF that happens too. The condition of the coils, even the gap plays a role in the spark ignition lag that will have an effect on where the actual timing really lights combustion.
Timing map values, bah
Jan 13, 2008, 07:52 PM
#282
shameless,
I still don't really understand why you are rescaling the RPM so much in the 3k to 5k region if you are possibly only running 1* difference in that whole power band.
Also, I don't see why you added so much load resolution when you have a sea of 6's and 7's in the areas where load changes the most quickly.
This map and the earlier look like you are just doing it because you can.
In my honest opinion, you would be better off with the higher resolution 5500 and up.
I still don't really understand why you are rescaling the RPM so much in the 3k to 5k region if you are possibly only running 1* difference in that whole power band.
Also, I don't see why you added so much load resolution when you have a sea of 6's and 7's in the areas where load changes the most quickly.
This map and the earlier look like you are just doing it because you can.
In my honest opinion, you would be better off with the higher resolution 5500 and up.
Jan 13, 2008, 07:56 PM
#283
shameless,
I still don't really understand why you are rescaling the RPM so much in the 3k to 5k region if you are possibly only running 1* difference in that whole power band.
Also, I don't see why you added so much load resolution when you have a sea of 6's and 7's in the areas where load changes the most quickly.
This map and the earlier look like you are just doing it because you can.
In my honest opinion, you would be better off with the higher resolution 5500 and up.
I still don't really understand why you are rescaling the RPM so much in the 3k to 5k region if you are possibly only running 1* difference in that whole power band.
Also, I don't see why you added so much load resolution when you have a sea of 6's and 7's in the areas where load changes the most quickly.
This map and the earlier look like you are just doing it because you can.
In my honest opinion, you would be better off with the higher resolution 5500 and up.
Jan 14, 2008, 02:08 AM
#285
shameless,
I still don't really understand why you are rescaling the RPM so much in the 3k to 5k region if you are possibly only running 1* difference in that whole power band.
Also, I don't see why you added so much load resolution when you have a sea of 6's and 7's in the areas where load changes the most quickly.
This map and the earlier look like you are just doing it because you can.
In my honest opinion, you would be better off with the higher resolution 5500 and up.
I still don't really understand why you are rescaling the RPM so much in the 3k to 5k region if you are possibly only running 1* difference in that whole power band.
Also, I don't see why you added so much load resolution when you have a sea of 6's and 7's in the areas where load changes the most quickly.
This map and the earlier look like you are just doing it because you can.
In my honest opinion, you would be better off with the higher resolution 5500 and up.
I will try rescaling RPM for more high RPM resolution though
Last edited by recompile; Jan 14, 2008 at 08:10 AM.