Notices
ECU Flash

Let's see your fully tuned timing maps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2008, 10:29 AM
  #301  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by tkklemann
Interesting first map. Pretty ugly. An excellent way to decrease your gas mileage at 3-3500 RPM cruise.


Or an interesting way to avoid correctly scaling for larger injectors ...

Last edited by TouringBubble; Mar 3, 2008 at 10:52 AM.
Old Mar 3, 2008, 11:03 AM
  #302  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
It doesn't matter what AFR is on the map, the NB O2 will keep the burn at 14.7 in closed loop no matter what is on the table, even while highly diluted, fuel economic exhaust recirc which only activates in closed loop.

Wondering if there's a way to fudge the front O2 to run leaner than stoich to save gas, no reason not to run lean catless anyways.
Old Mar 3, 2008, 11:13 AM
  #303  
Newbie
 
wrx_ua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ukraine, Kiev
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
Or an interesting way to avoid correctly scaling for larger injectors ...
Both cars have only TBE. Injectors are stock!
Old Mar 3, 2008, 11:40 AM
  #304  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
It doesn't matter what AFR is on the map, the NB O2 will keep the burn at 14.7 in closed loop no matter what is on the table, even while highly diluted, fuel economic exhaust recirc which only activates in closed loop.

Wondering if there's a way to fudge the front O2 to run leaner than stoich to save gas, no reason not to run lean catless anyways.
I know this is doeable with a zeitronix or innovate. but it would be great if we can change this using ecu flash. being able to do this would definitely yeild better fuel economy while in close loop.
Old Mar 3, 2008, 11:54 AM
  #305  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
tkklemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
It doesn't matter what AFR is on the map, the NB O2 will keep the burn at 14.7 in closed loop no matter what is on the table, even while highly diluted, fuel economic exhaust recirc which only activates in closed loop.

Wondering if there's a way to fudge the front O2 to run leaner than stoich to save gas, no reason not to run lean catless anyways.


Assuming that his car doesn't have the Mods to the Open Loop Load Maps, or, maybe I am just getting to used to tuning IX's and doing that mod right from the get-go.
Old Mar 3, 2008, 12:24 PM
  #306  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,071
Received 1,056 Likes on 764 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewzaragoza
I know this is doeable with a zeitronix or innovate. but it would be great if we can change this using ecu flash. being able to do this would definitely yeild better fuel economy while in close loop.
You can by forcing the car in open loop during cruise with the open loop tables.
Old Mar 3, 2008, 12:50 PM
  #307  
EE
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
EE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe if we can know the voltage of the nb at 15.5 afr (say x volts), we can put a simple electronic circuit between the nb and the ecu which will, when reading x volts, convert it to the voltage that the nb gives when reading 14.7
ofcourse the circuit will have to also offset the nb voltage when it's reading 14.7...
basically the circuit will have to switch the whole voltage vs afr curve...

what do u guys think??


Rgds+
Old Mar 3, 2008, 12:51 PM
  #308  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^^ yeah that is what i have setup as of now until i get a zeitronix. is there a disadvantage when you cruise in open loop compared if you are in closed loop? i'm pretty sure there is since i have to set up my cruise block around 15.7 to see some fuel savings.
Old Mar 3, 2008, 12:59 PM
  #309  
EE
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
EE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah cuz the egr doesn't work when in open loop...
Old Mar 5, 2008, 05:16 PM
  #310  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ixbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: so cal
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here's mines....mods are still TBE, 720cc, invidia o2, and last but not least #65 pill please all comments welcome...i'm still in the early stages of tuning for boost @ 23psi so it's conservative in timing and fuel, what do u think of the wgdc table for a 65 pill is it ok?. advice is greatly appreciated..o almost forgot it's 91octane

Name:  23psi.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  99.1 KB
Name:  23ignition.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  67.1 KB
Old Mar 5, 2008, 05:21 PM
  #311  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ixbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: so cal
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here's another log with lower boost/load on 3rd gear...the previous pulls were incomplete
Name:  3rdgearpull.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  112.7 KB
Old Mar 5, 2008, 05:29 PM
  #312  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ChuckP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ixbreaker
here's mines....mods are still TBE, 720cc, invidia o2, and last but not least #65 pill please all comments welcome...i'm still in the early stages of tuning for boost @ 23psi so it's conservative in timing and fuel, what do u think of the wgdc table for a 65 pill is it ok?. advice is greatly appreciated..o almost forgot it's 91octane



Why so rich?
1* at peak torque?
Old Mar 5, 2008, 05:35 PM
  #313  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ixbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: so cal
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
originally @ 4...but when i started playing around with the wgdc #'s i lowered it as a precautionary playing with 91octane. maybe too much huh?
Old Mar 5, 2008, 05:44 PM
  #314  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,071
Received 1,056 Likes on 764 Posts
Some cars you can only run 1*, mainly depending on boost. I would start leaning out your AFR and see how the car reacts, then start fine tuning the ign timing.

Looks like you right on track so far.

You should be able to run some more boost as well, 20-21psi is just starting on the 9's.
Old Mar 5, 2008, 05:51 PM
  #315  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ixbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: so cal
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
Some cars you can only run 1*, mainly depending on boost. I would start leaning out your AFR and see how the car reacts, then start fine tuning the ign timing.

Looks like you right on track so far.

You should be able to run some more boost as well, 20-21psi is just starting on the 9's.
thanks for the comment...i've read one of your threads on socalevo regarding the gains in boost vs. timing and was leaning towards boost instead. do you think i should aim for higher boost eg:24psi or more timing with my 65 pill i don't think i can go too far cuz it's almost maxed out.


Quick Reply: Let's see your fully tuned timing maps



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 PM.