Let's see your fully tuned timing maps
#796
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
I just took a few maps from this thread, and made this one for my 93 octane, stock turbo, exhaust/intake '04 RS. I ended the top at 310, so that I could get more resolution between 100 and 180, and then I averaged the numbers between. See any problems?
Also, what do you guys do for your low-octane map, do you leave it stock, or do you change that as well?
--mark
Also, what do you guys do for your low-octane map, do you leave it stock, or do you change that as well?
--mark
on knock ecu uses low oct map so it should always be less then the high oct.
if its an evo 8 set the peak boost area to around 3-4* and end at 10* uptop for your base map.. baby steps.. otherwise you will fry the rings with detonation.
93 is easy to tune tho.. you know the drill.. when it knocks pull timing.. keep in mind you can cause knock also downlow with to little timing tho.
#798
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
Well guys here's mine. Let me know what you think.
I'm thinking about pulling some timing in the low RPMs from 100-200 load to help aid in quicker spool-up. I'm hitting 26psi around 4100 and the car feels a little sluggish in the low RPMs. What do you guys think? My mods are in my sig. and I'll be installing a Grimmspeed 3 port tomorrow which should also help with quicker spool. Thanks for your input
I'm thinking about pulling some timing in the low RPMs from 100-200 load to help aid in quicker spool-up. I'm hitting 26psi around 4100 and the car feels a little sluggish in the low RPMs. What do you guys think? My mods are in my sig. and I'll be installing a Grimmspeed 3 port tomorrow which should also help with quicker spool. Thanks for your input
Last edited by Ian0611; Mar 18, 2011 at 10:46 PM.
#801
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
I usually start my pulls at 2000 but I'm only hitting 9psi by 3K and then then it takes off and I'm at 20psi by 3500 and 25psi by 4000. So IDK. Maybe i'll just leave it where it is cuz it makes daily driving a lot easier and prolly better on gas too
As far as the timing at cruise goes that's all Appauldd there. I think he was trying to help out my fuel economy . The car cruises really good without any knock.
#802
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
More timing increases power; so more timing at cruise increases fuel economy because you don't need to give as much throttle to maintain your speed. You can verify this by looking at your boost gauge while cruising; with more timing you'll have more vacuum, which indicates you're using less gas. More timing in the 60-90 load will give you better acceleration when just cruising around, also increasing fuel economy and making the car feel more "zippy"
#804
Newbie
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Danbury, Connecticut
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This map is what I have on my Evo IX GSR now with:
Greddy EBC @ 21psi and TBE.
I have just added:
ETS Intake & LICP
Walbro 255
PTE880's
Kelford 272's
The car seems okay, but I am a little afraid to go WOT because of fuel issues that I am working out. In the meantime, can anyone offer advice on what modifications will need to be made to my timing map? It looks pretty aggressive to me, are these typically tuned down with the addition of larger cams? Thanks
Greddy EBC @ 21psi and TBE.
I have just added:
ETS Intake & LICP
Walbro 255
PTE880's
Kelford 272's
The car seems okay, but I am a little afraid to go WOT because of fuel issues that I am working out. In the meantime, can anyone offer advice on what modifications will need to be made to my timing map? It looks pretty aggressive to me, are these typically tuned down with the addition of larger cams? Thanks
#806
Newbie
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Danbury, Connecticut
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you Raptord. I am on 93 octane.
I was running lean because the injector scaling value was too high. I've reduced it to 770 and made a few latency changes, but have not yet flashed the ECU. I will flash and log tonight and post some better information.
I was running lean because the injector scaling value was too high. I've reduced it to 770 and made a few latency changes, but have not yet flashed the ECU. I will flash and log tonight and post some better information.
#809
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Big city, Bright lights
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
so i certainly wouldnt call this map fully tuned, but id certainly like some input since it is my very first attempt.
this is what is on the car currently (po had it tuned by someone from this board). there were tons of load columns that had no order, they jumped all over, so i attempted to smooth the whole thing out. there were also low load cells that had les timing than a stock rom which was very odd to me, so i fixed those too. i havent loaded my version, as i need to get my wideband to start working properly first.
on logs i typically hit 260 load, very occasionally 280 load. peak boost is usually 23.5psi. car is a stock turbo IX with TBE, perrin intake, ETS LICP, ETS 3.5 fmic, always on 93.
OLD
NEW
this is what is on the car currently (po had it tuned by someone from this board). there were tons of load columns that had no order, they jumped all over, so i attempted to smooth the whole thing out. there were also low load cells that had les timing than a stock rom which was very odd to me, so i fixed those too. i havent loaded my version, as i need to get my wideband to start working properly first.
on logs i typically hit 260 load, very occasionally 280 load. peak boost is usually 23.5psi. car is a stock turbo IX with TBE, perrin intake, ETS LICP, ETS 3.5 fmic, always on 93.
OLD
NEW
Last edited by killerpenguin21; Apr 9, 2011 at 04:47 PM.
#810
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
hrmmm.. first one is where i am now, second one is a trace. 26-27 or so psi stock ix turbo. hks cams. ive made minor tweaks here and there but you get the idea. i normally run about 22psi, but i tuned for higher aswe4ll.. thoughts?
Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Apr 10, 2011 at 03:04 AM.