Notices
ECU Flash

economy tuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:08 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
C6, thats a very valid point but how can we tell if that is true? Other than the fact that I personally have seen an increase in economy (while others have not seen a change or worse) ?
If you spend alot of time on the freeway staying out of boost you will conserve fuel. If you drive frequently into boost, not even WOT, you may likely conserve fuel with direct open loop driving.

This is the thing with ethanol flex fuel cars, the egr dilution factor can tolerate very lean conditions allowing the fuel economy to outweigh gasoline on a gal to gal basis. Esp with DI ethanol/port gasoline turbo engine, they were also able to push the HP this way much further than any alky kit would
Old Jan 29, 2008, 10:23 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,397
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by tkklemann
I would think you could, if somehow you were able to look at an average IPW over say one tank of gas. That would be a ton of logging though.

If your fuel pressure system remains unmodified during the course of two tank fulls of gas, one tank for non-economy and one for economy, your IPW's should decrease on the average because they aren't firing as long as with a 15.7 afr than a 14.7 afr.

I bet it could be quantified by IPW, but that a ton of logging, everytime you drive the car, for as long as you drive it, for two entire gas tank fulls.
For the record, 16.2 is the max, 15.7 seems to work really well for me.

T-So I need a log that is at least 2 seperate tanks full and see what the average IPW seems to be cruising? I could have someone ride shotgun on a 300mi roadtrip and watch the IPW flat cruising at a known constant TPS and Vacuum and then see what the IPW is. Otherwise I'd end up with a 6gb log I think. IF it needs to be done though it needs to be done.

C6- thanks for clearing that up I knew there was more to it than I was seeing or reasoning on, I just hadnt figured it out.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 11:22 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Running around 15.8:1 I was able to get 330 miles on one tank. This was mostly 5th and 6th gear cruising and almost no boost.

I added the lean cruise settings mainly because I drive over several foothills on the way to and from work every day and was getting like 220 miles per tank. Now I generally get 240-260. This is obviously due to the fact that the engine is loaded significantly more traveling over the hills than on level terrain.

I say that the open loop cruise works.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:49 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
This is the nice thing about the zeitronix wideband. If you hook up the simulated narrowband O2 sensor wire to the front O2 sensor input on the ECU (your replacing the front O2 signal completely), you can set the stoich switching point from 14.7 up or down and it works like a charm. True closed loop adjustments and no need to fidget with fuel cell #'s. 15.5:1 worked well for me, I usually hit 220 miles per tank as well at 14.7:1, I hit around 260-270 at 15.5:1.
Old Feb 1, 2008, 02:24 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Profoxcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SoFla
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
This is the nice thing about the zeitronix wideband. If you hook up the simulated narrowband O2 sensor wire to the front O2 sensor input on the ECU (your replacing the front O2 signal completely), you can set the stoich switching point from 14.7 up or down and it works like a charm. True closed loop adjustments and no need to fidget with fuel cell #'s. 15.5:1 worked well for me, I usually hit 220 miles per tank as well at 14.7:1, I hit around 260-270 at 15.5:1.

I need to get a wideband display and a boost gauge or something.
I get 220 to till the light turn on but I can drive to aprox 250 -260 with the ligh on at 15.7:1 - 16.1:1 wiht the above alteration (LC-1 NB simulator)
Old Feb 13, 2008, 12:40 PM
  #21  
EE
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
EE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much would i b able to increase afr's if i stay in closed loop (keeping egr working), like Jack_of_Trades did??
would doing this require adjusting fuel trims or they'll be okay???


rgds+

Last edited by EE; Feb 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM.
Old Feb 13, 2008, 03:19 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The fuel trims should automatically smooth out after a day or two of driving. If your trims are within +/-5%, don't bother making any changes.
Old Feb 13, 2008, 03:26 PM
  #23  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i gained better fuel economy when i added my 272 cams on my VIII any reasons y?
Old Feb 13, 2008, 03:36 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Could be that your timing settings were more efficient with the newer cams at cruising loads.
Old Feb 13, 2008, 03:54 PM
  #25  
EE
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
EE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wt abt afr's?? wt's the max afr's i can run when still running the egr system?
Old Feb 13, 2008, 04:05 PM
  #26  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
Could be that your timing settings were more efficient with the newer cams at cruising loads.
the ecu does all that in closed loop correct since its at cruising speeds
Old Feb 13, 2008, 04:26 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Yeah, it self adjusts up to about +/25%.
Old Feb 13, 2008, 04:58 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Bexa20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
are there any short/long term side efects that you might experience by changing the afr from 14.7 to let say 15.5
Old Feb 13, 2008, 05:43 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Higher EGT's for longer durations which I suppose could take a toll on spark plug ceramic parts perhaps? As long as knock isn't an issue, EGT's are the main thing I could think of.
Old Feb 13, 2008, 05:53 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (69)
 
BluEVOIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Bexa20
are there any short/long term side efects that you might experience by changing the afr from 14.7 to let say 15.5
From what I've read online, 14.7 is the chosen a/f ratio for closed loop operations because of emmissions reasons. It keeps the catalytic converter hot enough to do its job.


Quick Reply: economy tuning



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 AM.