PATCH: TephraMod V5

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 23, 2008 | 07:05 AM

#211

Jack_of_Trades

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 3,523

Likes: 2

From: Opelika,AL

Quote:

Originally Posted by agron25

What is that is normal that I find these values
the probleme baterry voltage ? or good ?
thank

Change the BATTERY VOLTAGE address from 65D4 to 67F0. This is the correct address.

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Mar 23, 2008 at 07:09 AM.

Reply Like

Mar 23, 2008 | 07:20 AM

#212

John F

Evolving Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 121

Likes: 0

From: Edinburgh, UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by agron25

i have these address in the xml ,but not work not

Is this what you have in your XML? This works for me.

<table name="Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation" address="37c0">
<table name="Battery Voltage" address="66f4" elements="7"/>
</table>

Reply Like

Mar 23, 2008 | 07:33 AM

#213

agron25

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 93

Likes: 0

From: france

is good
thank

Reply Like

Mar 23, 2008 | 09:49 AM

#214

Jack_of_Trades

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 3,523

Likes: 2

From: Opelika,AL

Quote:

Originally Posted by John F

Is this what you have in your XML? This works for me.

<table name="Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation" address="37c0">
<table name="Battery Voltage" address="66f4" elements="7"/>
</table>

66f4 is a 14 element table, not a 7 element table like you should be using for the battery voltage. Granted the first 7 values are the same in both, but the 67f0 should be the CORRECT Battery Voltage Table for his ROM ID(in my findings inside the disassembled ROM).

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Mar 23, 2008 at 09:59 AM.

Reply Like

Mar 23, 2008 | 10:09 AM

#215

John F

Evolving Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 121

Likes: 0

From: Edinburgh, UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades

Ok, thanks. Should the XML be as follows then?

<table name="Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation" address="37c0">
<table name="Battery Voltage" address="67f0" elements="7"/>
</table>

Reply Like

Mar 23, 2008 | 10:55 AM

#216

Jack_of_Trades

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 3,523

Likes: 2

From: Opelika,AL

yeah, perfect

I assume the values look fine in ECUFlash right?

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 05:00 AM

#217

MR Turco

EvoM Staff Alumni

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,233

Likes: 3

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR Turco

Tephra, i dont know if this was mentioned but i have my CEL flash set to 1000ms and it flashes for what must be 5 minutes. I have the 88xx15 IX rom. let me know if i can send you my rom because moving tables sucks

JDM MAP, ECU controlled boost and tuned tables ftl Edit: i love the two different speeds of flashing though, very nice.

bump - it got buried.

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 10:13 AM

#218

diiirk@AwdMotorsports

Former Sponsor

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 868

Likes: 0

From: ft lauderdale

If i mod my ecuflash and my map for these mods, and then my tuner retunes me, i would lose my mods right? i think i need to wait until im retuned to mod the map.

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 10:25 AM

#219

fostytou

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 3,143

Likes: 7

From: Aurora, IL

Quote:

Originally Posted by diiirk

If i mod my ecuflash and my map for these mods, and then my tuner retunes me, i would lose my mods right? i think i need to wait until im retuned to mod the map.

You would just need to supply your tuner with your XML file for your rom to use temporarily while he tunes you. If he can't work with that, then you probably need a new tuner

Either way, it would be pretty stressful on your ECU memory to go back and fourth every time you needed a flash, let alone to get the second map!

Last edited by fostytou; Mar 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM.

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 05:46 PM

#220

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR Turco

bump - it got buried.

hrmmm - did you remove all the old xml? also what was the cel flash time before you changed it? I think it defaults to 2000ms, if it was some other number then check your endian

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 05:57 PM

#221

MR Turco

EvoM Staff Alumni

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,233

Likes: 3

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

hrmmm - did you remove all the old xml? also what was the cel flash time before you changed it? I think it defaults to 2000ms, if it was some other number then check your endian

sigh, i feel like such a noob. I always check my endian too.... Thanks tephra

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 06:25 PM

#222

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

so was that the problem?

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 06:28 PM

#223

MR Turco

EvoM Staff Alumni

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,233

Likes: 3

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

so was that the problem?

I havent flashed it but changing the endian made the number a lot larger then what i had. So i assume yes.

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 06:33 PM

#224

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

ok lets go back a step.

what was your endian before (for EcuTime scaling)?

what ecuflash version are you using?

Reply Like

Mar 24, 2008 | 06:37 PM

#225

MR Turco

EvoM Staff Alumni

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,233

Likes: 3

From: Massachusetts

my endian for ECUtime was big and i changed it to little. I am running 1.29a.

Reply Like