Notices
ECU Flash

PATCH: TephraMod V5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2008, 12:43 AM
  #406  
Evolving Member
 
evo828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yes - that was the "functionality test" so all the tables were the same (even the alt maps) to my unpatched version of the ROM. When I get back home I will post the graph. The spike was about 0.1 bar (1.7 bar) above what it used to be (1.6 bar). It was corrected within 0.2 sec. I was never spiking over 1.7 - so that is why I got focused on that.
Old Apr 10, 2008, 12:48 AM
  #407  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
mmm, the only thing I can think of is load changes or temp changes.

ie going up a hill you will generate different boost vs flat ground
also
cooler temp will generate more boost than hotter temps...

I'm not saying your wrong, just I don't think there could be an issue, be glad to look at logs thou
Old Apr 10, 2008, 03:12 AM
  #408  
Evolving Member
 
John F's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo828
Just finally had time to try the 5.1 - anyone observed this behaviour (96530006 with 5.1):

in both - normal and alt maps - with wot 3rd gear up to 6000rpm then change gear quickly to 4th (without NLTS) - the boost spikes when the load goes up when the 4th gear engages and wot again - of course then boost comes down (correction) - but could this be becasue the whole procedure (patch) is slowing down the timer/cycle - so it takes a little bit longer for all adjustment that the ECU is doing (on boos it is moost visible) but maybe timing/fueling gets slightly delayed as well. I can cure the boost spike by closely macthing the WGDC etc. - but this was not happening on a normal version of the ROM.

Not really an issue - but just lets me think about how much processor time is "lost" going through the whole routine and whether this doesnot affect some other time/cycle dependent performance.
I have not noticed anything unusual. I find ECU boost control very consistent and stable with my AVCR solenoid. Its even better since I tried the boost control mods you posted. Thanks for that. I target my boost to get 1.65bar but in reality it will run between about 1.63 to 1.7. I don't worry about the variation as I consider it normal.
Old Apr 10, 2008, 03:34 AM
  #409  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Oracle1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am trying so God damn hard not to ask... Must be patient!!!
Old Apr 10, 2008, 04:23 AM
  #410  
Newbie
 
Adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dave, any chance of John Banks ROMID soon, I am happy to bribe you with more donations!



edited because reading back it says be patient, ok, I'll be patient, but I'm not editing it now that I puit the effort into asking.

Sohail,

Both John and I use the ATS to very good effect, i suggest you try it. Most welcome to look at mine when we meet up to install Dave's new patch!

Last edited by Adamantium; Apr 10, 2008 at 04:27 AM.
Old Apr 10, 2008, 05:10 AM
  #411  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
its not that I dont want todo it i just dont have time..

if I get some free time @work tommorow ill try and wrap it up
Old Apr 10, 2008, 07:54 AM
  #412  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Oracle1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Top Man Dave!

Adam, perhaps I'll try your ATS before commiting! Good excuse for more datalogging.
Old Apr 10, 2008, 08:54 AM
  #413  
Account Disabled
 
lemmonhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: wexford,pa
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i got a question on the desired boost engine load mpa, why is the exix RPM Vs %
isn't it suppose to be RPM vs LOad?
Old Apr 10, 2008, 10:26 AM
  #414  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another question..

1) I had the Rear o2 sim xml in my file before I did the V5. Do I need to delete this XML since V5 automatically has it in there via an enable/disable option?

See Below:

Code:
<table name="Rear 02 Sim Hook" category="Rear_02" address="c250" type="3D" level="1" scaling="Hex16">
	<table name="Code" type="Static X Axis" elements="1" scaling="Hex16">
	<data>Hex16</data>
	</table>
	<table name="Address" type="Static Y Axis" elements="10">
	<data>C250</data>
	<data>C252</data>
	<data>C254</data>
	<data>C256</data>
	<data>C258</data>
	<data>C25A</data>
	<data>C25C</data>
	<data>C25E</data>
	<data>C260</data>
	<data>C262</data>
	</table>
	</table>

	<table name="Rear 02 Sim Subroutine" category="Rear_02" address="4a000" type="3D" level="1" scaling="Hex16">
	<table name="Code" type="Static X Axis" elements="1" scaling="Hex16">
	<data>Hex16</data>
	</table>
	<table name="Address" type="Static Y Axis" elements="20">
	<data>4A000</data>
	<data>4A002</data>
	<data>4A004</data>
	<data>4A006</data>
	<data>4A008</data>
	<data>4A00A</data>
	<data>4A00C</data>
	<data>4A00E</data>
	<data>4A010</data>
	<data>4A012</data>
	<data>4A014</data>
	<data>4A016</data>
	<data>4A018</data>
	<data>4A01A</data>
	<data>4A01C</data>
	<data>4A01E</data>
	<data>4A020</data>
	<data>4A022</data>
	<data>4A024</data>
	<data>4A026</data>
	</table>
	</table>
Old Apr 10, 2008, 11:38 AM
  #415  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Yes
Old Apr 10, 2008, 11:40 AM
  #416  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
Yes
Thank you...

Cheers-
E
Old Apr 10, 2008, 03:42 PM
  #417  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SoCalRedLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does anyone have the Tephra Version 4.2 for the 94170008 ecu?

ive been trying to find it, and it wont let me download it from globalshare...
Old Apr 10, 2008, 03:59 PM
  #418  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just use the 14 or 15 i used the 14 its a better rom than the 8
Old Apr 10, 2008, 04:06 PM
  #419  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SoCalRedLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^alright. i was just hoping to keep this guys car mostly stock, cause i dont want to have to get guff from him later for anything not working properly.
Old Apr 10, 2008, 05:28 PM
  #420  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by lemmonhead
i got a question on the desired boost engine load mpa, why is the exix RPM Vs % isn't it suppose to be RPM vs LOad?
% = Load, you can change it if you like

Originally Posted by socalredline
blah


what do you want 4.2 for?


Quick Reply: PATCH: TephraMod V5



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24 PM.